GI
GRAFTECH INTERNATIONAL LTD (EAF)·Q2 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q2 2025 net sales were $131.8M, with sales volume up 12% YoY to 28.6k MT and capacity utilization at 65%; adjusted EBITDA turned positive at $3.5M (GAAP EBITDA $3.4M) amid a 13% YoY reduction in cash COGS/MT, though GAAP net loss widened to $86.9M on a $43M non‑cash tax valuation allowance .
- Versus consensus: revenue modestly beat ($131.8M vs $130.4M*), EPS was materially better than expectations (−$0.34 vs −$1.00*), and EBITDA exceeded (GAAP EBITDA $3.4M vs −$1.4M*); sequential pricing rose 2% to ~$4,200/MT, aided by stronger U.S. mix (positive surprise) . Values marked with * are from S&P Global.
- Guidance updates: raised full‑year 2025 cash COGS/MT decline to 7–9% (from mid‑single digit); capex ~$40M maintained; sales volume growth ~10% YoY maintained/refined; working capital expected to be favorable to FY cash flow .
- Strategic actions: U.S. sales volume +38% YoY in Q2 and +32% YTD, mix shift supporting ASP resilience; management reiterated a 15% price increase on uncommitted 2025 volume .
- Potential trading catalysts: U.S. tariff backdrop and preliminary 93.5% anti‑dumping duties on Chinese anode materials (combined ~160% tariffs) could benefit Western graphite supply chains; company later regained NYSE compliance and approved a 1‑for‑10 reverse split (post‑quarter) .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
What Went Well
- Volume and utilization improvements: “We grew sales volume by 12% YoY…highest level since Q3 2022” and utilization at 65% .
- Cost execution: Cash COGS/MT down 13% YoY in Q2; full‑year decline raised to 7–9% reflecting “strong execution of our initiatives to enhance our cost structure” .
- Positive EBITDA: “Generated positive EBITDA…reflecting continued progress on our path to normalized levels of profitability” .
- U.S. mix shift: U.S. sales volume +38% YoY in Q2; sequential ASP +2% to ~$4,200/MT due to mix optimization .
What Went Wrong
- Pricing headwinds: Weighted‑average realized price ~$4,200/MT was down 12% YoY due to LTA roll‑off and persistent competitive pressures (especially Chinese exports) .
- GAAP loss widened: Net loss increased to $86.9M from $14.8M YoY, including a $43M non‑cash deferred tax valuation allowance; gross profit was near breakeven .
- Cash flow drag from interest and inventory build: Operating cash outflow of $53.2M, including $39M cash interest (semi‑annual notes $34M), and planned H1 inventory build; adjusted FCF −$53.3M .
Financial Results
KPIs and Operating Metrics
Capital Structure and Liquidity (Quarter‑End)
Guidance Changes
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- “We grew sales volume by 12% YoY…our highest level since Q3 2022…generated positive EBITDA” and “capacity utilization rate increased to 65%” .
- “Our weighted average price was approximately $4,200 per metric ton…increase of nearly 8% vs Q4’24 non‑LTA pricing,” driven by U.S. mix shift .
- “We now anticipate a 7%–9% year‑over‑year decline in our Cash COGS per metric ton for 2025…using the midpoint…~$3,950” .
- Tariffs: “We expect higher Section 232 tariffs will support an increase in steel production within the United States…tremendous opportunity for GrafTech” .
- Strategic posture: “We remain bullish on…shift towards electric arc furnace steelmaking…well‑positioned to capitalize” .
- Western EV supply chain: “Preliminary anti‑dumping tariffs of 93.5%…combined tariff of 160% on Chinese anode material…we are well‑positioned to be a valuable strategic partner” .
Q&A Highlights
- U.S. exposure and share gains: Americas now “a little bit more than 50%” of revenue; U.S. share up 31% YoY; management expects robust U.S. demand under current tariff landscape .
- Pricing outlook: Competitive environment persists due to Chinese oversupply; signs of stabilization with ASP +8% vs Q4’24 non‑LTA; hope for recovery in H2’25 and into 2026 .
- Needle coke/anode trajectory: Near‑term needle coke pricing flat; medium‑term uplift possible as Western supply chains stand up; no new needle coke projects announced beyond Seadrift expansion .
- EBITDA trajectory: FY 2025 likely at or slightly above break‑even EBITDA; H2 costs up on seasonality, tariffs, less LCM reserve benefit; negotiations in Q4 could influence 2026 .
- Government partnerships: Management sees potential for public‑private partnerships (e.g., DoD) to catalyze Western critical mineral supply chains; remained non‑committal on specifics .
Estimates Context
Values marked with * are retrieved from S&P Global.
Implications: Consensus likely underestimated the degree of mix‑driven ASP stabilization and near‑term cost progress; raised full‑year cash COGS guidance (7–9% decline) and U.S. share gains suggest potential upward revisions to H2 EBITDA, while GAAP EPS will remain sensitive to non‑cash tax valuation dynamics and interest expense .
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Volume recovery and utilization improvements are tangible; near‑term profitability inflecting via cost actions, but pricing remains the swing factor; watch U.S. mix and contract negotiations in Q4 .
- The raised 2025 cash COGS guidance (7–9% decline) is a material positive for EBITDA resilience; sequential cost seasonality in H2 and interest burden remain headwinds for FCF .
- U.S. tariffs and growing EAF share underpin demand in GrafTech’s strongest region; continued mix shift is a controllable lever for ASP and margin stabilization .
- Western EV supply chain policy actions (anode tariffs) create optionality for needle coke/graphitization participation; monitor potential public‑private partnerships and capital needs .
- Balance sheet/liquidity are adequate near‑term (Q2 liquidity $367M; no major maturities until Dec 2029), but net debt remains high; interest outflows drive FCF volatility .
- Post‑quarter corporate actions (regained NYSE compliance; 1‑for‑10 reverse split) reduce listing risk and may affect trading dynamics/float perception .
- Tactical setup: Into H2’25, catalysts include pricing negotiations, tariff developments, and evidence of European recovery; risk remains from global oversupply and non‑cash tax valuation impacts .
Notes:
- All document‑based figures and quotes are cited to company filings and materials.
- Consensus figures are from S&P Global and marked with an asterisk.