Sign in

You're signed outSign in or to get full access.

Gail Van Beveren

Executive Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer at EVEREST GROUP
Executive

About Gail Van Beveren

Everest Group’s Executive Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer; age 62; 38 years at the company. She oversees global talent acquisition, retention, development, compensation/benefits, engagement surveys, and serves as an executive sponsor of the DEI Council; she holds a B.S. in Economics and an M.S. in Business Economics from Rutgers University and a CPCU designation . During her tenure, company performance included Gross Written Premium (GWP) growth of 19.2% in 2023 and 9.1% in 2024; Net Operating Income ROE of 23.1% in 2023 and 9.0% in 2024; and TSR of 26.5% (2023) and 9.2% (2024) as defined by the company .

Past Roles

OrganizationRoleYearsStrategic impact
Everest GroupEVP & CHROn/a (current)Leads global HR strategy (talent acquisition, retention, development, compensation/benefits), executive sponsor of DEI, global engagement surveys
Everest GroupSVP, Human Resourcesn/aIncreasing responsibility in HR leadership
Everest GroupVP, Human Resourcesn/aHR leadership roles across functions
Everest GroupBusiness Systems Analyst (IT)n/a (entry)Early career in technology; foundation for later HR operating insights

External Roles

No external directorships or outside public company roles disclosed .

Fixed Compensation

Metric2023
Base salary (USD)$468,000
All Other Compensation (USD)$100,547 (life/umbrella/LTD insurance, company match/discretionary contributions, dividends on restricted shares, etc.)
Pension/SERP present value (as of 12/31/2023)Retirement Plan PVAB: $2,379,099; 37.70 years credited service

Notes:

  • Participates in Supplemental Savings Plan; 2023 company contributions $48,723; aggregate balance $432,384 at year-end 2023 .

Performance Compensation

Annual Incentive (Cash)

Item2023
Target bonus (% of base)100%
Actual bonus (USD)$550,000
DeterminantsCompany performance (Operating ROE >23% in 2023), Shared Services bonus funding, individual goals (e.g., global HR support for international expansion; culture/behavior standards; expanded career development)

Annual incentive structure for NEOs: 60% company financial (Adjusted Operating ROE) and 40% individual performance; Ms. Van Beveren participated in the Company’s Annual Incentive Plan (not the Executive Incentive Plan) but was still assessed on Company and individual goals .

Long-Term Incentives (Equity)

Grant yearTime-vested RSUs (USD)Performance Share Units (USD)Vesting/metrics
2023$535,000 $265,000 RSUs: 20%/yr over 5 years; PSUs: 3-year program with annual Operating ROE tranches and TSR measures vs targets and relative to peers (0–175% payout)
2024 program features (for NEOs)n/an/aFrom 2024 grants: RSUs vest 33 1/3%/yr over 3 years; PSUs: 50% Net Operating Income ROE, 25% TSR vs target, 25% relative TSR over 3 years; maximum payout raised to 200%; dividend equivalents accrue on PSUs in proportion to vesting

PSU performance framework (company-wide):

  • Annual Operating/Net Operating Income ROE tranches (50% weighting) with targets set each year
  • Annual TSR against target (25%) and 3-year relative TSR vs peer median (25%); 0–175% (moving to 200% for 2025 grants)

Equity Ownership & Alignment

Ownership itemDetail
Total beneficial ownership13,825 shares as of March 18, 2024
Included restricted sharesIncludes 223 + 4,009 restricted shares from 2020 Plan (part of beneficial total)
PSUs and RSUs outstanding (12/31/2023)RSUs unvested: 4,171 shares ($1,474,782); PSUs unvested (target basis): 1,314 shares ($464,693) at $353.58/share
Ownership as % of shares outstanding~0.028% (13,825 / 48,760,131 shares outstanding as of 3/18/2024)
Stock ownership guidelinesCEO 6x salary; other EVPs/NEOs 3x salary; for 2023, all NEOs were in compliance
Hedging/pledgingProhibited by policy; anti-hedging rules and no pledging of company stock
Dividends on RSUsDividends paid during restricted period

Employment Terms

  • Employment agreement: none disclosed for Ms. Van Beveren; she is covered by the Everest Reinsurance Company Severance Plan (US) .
  • Severance (involuntary due to reorg/elimination): cash severance equal to 52 weeks of base pay plus earned vacation; other plan terms per Severance Plan .
  • Change-in-Control (Senior Executive CIC Plan): double-trigger; cash severance equals 2.0x average salary+bonus over prior 3 years; full vesting of restricted shares (PSUs governed by award agreements), 2 years of medical/dental benefits, and “special retirement benefits” (no excise tax gross-ups; “Best Net” reduction if needed) .
  • Clawback policy: updated to comply with SEC/NYSE; applies to current/former Section 16 officers and to misconduct; covers incentive-based compensation including equity .
  • Anti-hedging: prohibitions on shorting, derivatives, and certain transactions; options not broadly granted to executives (equity is RSUs/PSUs) .

Performance & Track Record (Company-level context)

Metric20232024
Gross Written Premium (GWP)$16.6B; +19.2% YoY $18.2B; +9.1% YoY (comparable basis)
Combined Ratio90.9% (attritional 87.6%) 102.3% (attritional 87.6%)
Net Income$2.5B $1.4B
Net Operating Income ROE23.1% 9.0%
TSR (company definition)26.5% 9.2%

Compensation Structure Analysis

  • Pay mix and alignment: For 2023, CHRO pay combined cash (base+bonus) with meaningful equity (RSUs+PSUs), with performance weighting through Operating ROE and TSR constructs to align with long-term value creation .
  • Shift in equity mix: Company-wide, starting in 2024/2025 program design, increased PSU rigor (50% of long-term incentives; max payout to 200%) and shorter RSU vesting (3 years), intensifying performance leverage and reducing time-to-vesting risk .
  • No options/repricings; anti-hedging and no pledging policies; clawback broadened; no single-trigger CIC; no excise tax gross-ups (“Best Net”)—shareholder-friendly features .

Risk Indicators & Red Flags

  • Section 16 filings: Forms 3 for Ms. Van Beveren and Mr. Anzaldua were filed late due to administrative oversight (company belief all other reports timely) .
  • Hedging/pledging: Prohibited (reduces misalignment risk) .
  • Say‑on‑Pay support: 94.17% (2023) and 93% (2024), indicating broad shareholder approval of pay practices .

Compensation Peer Group (Benchmarking)

Peer set used for benchmarking includes: AIG, Arch Capital, Axis Capital, Chubb, Cincinnati Financial, CNA Financial, Hanover Insurance, Markel, RenaissanceRe, The Hartford/W.R. Berkley (minor naming variations across years) .

Equity Vesting & Potential Selling Pressure

  • RSUs: legacy grants vest 20% annually over 5 years; from 2024, new RSUs vest 33 1/3% annually over 3 years—creating predictable annual release of shares that could drive scheduled Form 4 activity around vest dates (subject to company trading policies) .
  • PSUs: settle after 3-year performance period with annual ROE tranche “banking” and cumulative relative TSR component; realized shares depend on performance (0–175%, moving to 200% maximum for 2025 awards) .

Equity Ownership Snapshot (as of YE2023/March 2024)

ItemValue
Beneficial shares (3/18/2024)13,825
Unvested RSUs (12/31/2023)4,171 ($1,474,782 at $353.58)
PSUs outstanding (target; 12/31/2023)1,314 ($464,693 at $353.58)
Shares outstanding (3/18/2024)48,760,131
Ownership %~0.028% (derived from above)
Pledged sharesNone permitted (policy prohibits pledging)

Employment Terms – Detailed

TopicSummary
Severance (non‑CIC)52 weeks of pay if terminated due to office/division/department closure or role elimination (Severance Plan)
CIC (Senior Executive CIC Plan)Double trigger; 2.0× average salary+bonus (prior 3 years), restricted shares vest, medical/dental benefits continue for 2 years, special retirement benefits; “Best Net” cut if needed; PSUs handled under award terms
ClawbackSEC/NYSE compliant; applies to current/former Section 16 officers; incentive comp recoverable for restatements and for willful misconduct (includes equity)
Anti‑hedging/pledgingProhibited

Say‑on‑Pay & Shareholder Feedback

YearSupport
202394.17% approval
202493% approval

Investment Implications

  • Alignment: CHRO compensation combines salary with performance‑linked PSUs and company‑level metrics (Operating/Net Operating Income ROE, TSR), reinforcing long‑term value creation and human‑capital execution—key for talent‑intensive (re)insurance underwriting cycles .
  • Retention and overhang: RSU and PSU balances are moderate relative to float (ownership ~0.03%); predictable vesting cadence may create periodic sales but no pledging is allowed, mitigating forced‑sale risk .
  • Governance quality: Strong shareholder‑friendly features (double‑trigger CIC, no tax gross‑ups, anti‑hedging/pledging, refreshed clawbacks) and high say‑on‑pay support lower governance risk and suggest low pay‑for‑performance controversy risk .
  • Company fundamentals backdrop: 2023 results were exceptional (GWP +19.2%, ROE 23.1%, TSR 26.5%); 2024 normalized with lower ROE and higher combined ratio amid catastrophe activity. Incentive structures maintain discipline across cycles, but near‑term results can influence realized PSU payouts and vesting value .