EC
EGAIN Corp (EGAN)·Q2 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q2 FY25 revenue of $22.4M declined 6% YoY and rose 3% QoQ; non-GAAP EPS was $0.04 diluted ($0.05 basic). Results were within company guidance; SaaS gross margin held at 78% and total gross margin at 71% .
- Management cut FY25 revenue guidance to $88.5–$90.0M (from $92–$93M) and lowered non-GAAP NI to $4.1–$4.7M, but raised GAAP NI to $1.1–$1.7M; Q3 FY25 revenue guided to $21.0–$21.5M with a GAAP loss of $(0.3)–$(0.8)M .
- Mix shift continues: AI Knowledge Hub ARR grew 17% YoY and now represents 55% of SaaS ARR; PS attach is falling by design as deployments streamline, prompting a ~$2M reduction to FY25 PS revenue targets and tempering total revenue growth near term .
- Cash generation and capital return remained strong: $6.4M operating cash flow (29% margin) and 421K shares repurchased for $2.4M; cash and equivalents ended at $70.5M with no debt highlighted .
- Near-term stock reaction catalysts: lowered revenue outlook and PS mix drag vs. resilient SaaS margin/AI momentum; watch timing of 7‑figure deals (sales cycles extending as “AI offices” increase scrutiny) and Q3 headwinds (fewer calendar days and non‑recurring ~$0.6M usage revenue) .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
-
What Went Well
- AI momentum: “We won several new enterprise logos… AI Knowledge Hub ARR grew 17% YoY and 5% sequentially,” with more 7‑figure opportunities in the pipeline .
- Margin resilience and cash generation: SaaS gross margin remained 78% (unchanged YoY); total gross margin was 71%; Q2 operating cash flow $6.4M (29% margin) .
- Strategic wins: Examples include a major U.S. airline, a top interactive entertainment company (800M player accounts), and a global money transfer firm; AI Agent on track to launch in current quarter .
-
What Went Wrong
- Top-line pressure: Total revenue declined 6% YoY; GAAP EPS fell to $0.02 from $0.07; adjusted EBITDA margin compressed to 7% from 16% YoY .
- Guidance cut: FY25 revenue lowered to $88.5–$90.0M and non-GAAP NI to $4.1–$4.7M reflecting reduced PS attach and elongated large-deal cycles .
- PS revenue headwind: PS revenue missed internal expectations; management lowered FY25 PS revenue target by about $2M as product improvements reduce PS scope (beneficial long-term, near-term revenue drag) .
Financial Results
Segment revenue
KPIs and balance items
Guidance Changes
Notes: Q3 headwinds include fewer calendar days (~$0.33M revenue impact) and ~$0.6M usage-based revenue in Q2 not expected to recur in Q3 .
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- CEO Ashu Roy: “We won several new enterprise logos in the second quarter… our annual recurring revenue from AI Knowledge Hub customers grew by 17% year over year and 5% sequentially… we are seeing a growing number of seven-figure ARR deals in our sales pipeline” .
- “In the last 6 months… the number of 7‑figure deals in our pipeline [has] more than double[d]… the side effect… is more scrutiny… vetting process now includes groups like the AI office… these bigger deals are taking some more time to close” .
- CFO Eric Smit: “SaaS revenue… accounted for 93% of total revenue… PS revenue [came] in lower than expectations… we are lowering our PS revenue targets for fiscal 2025 by approximately [$2 million]… SaaS gross margin… 78%… total gross margin… 71%” .
- Q3 setup: “Fewer number of days… ~[$330,000] negative impact… Q2 revenue included approximately $600,000 of usage-based revenue, which we do not expect to recur in Q3” .
Q&A Highlights
- PS revenue outlook: Product connectors/templates reduce integration scope; building partner-led implementation capacity. Management will reallocate/reduce resources as needed to align with lower PS revenue base .
- Competitive displacement (U.S. airline win): Replacing a patchwork of legacy KM, CRM KM (Microsoft) and SharePoint—both consolidation and replacement play .
- Guidance context: FY25 revenue lowered to add “cushion” given extended cycles for large strategic AI Knowledge deals; SaaS expected ~93% of FY revenue .
- Capital return and balance sheet: $2.4M buyback in Q2; $70.5M cash at quarter-end; $10M remains on authorization .
Estimates Context
- Wall Street consensus (S&P Global) for Q2 FY25 EPS and revenue could not be retrieved at this time due to data access limits; therefore, we cannot provide a beat/miss vs. Street for Q2 or for forward periods. The company stated Q2 revenue was within internal guidance .
- Where estimate comparisons are essential, we recommend revisiting once S&P Global data access is restored; current guidance implies lower FY25 revenue and non-GAAP NI than prior outlook, with GAAP NI raised .
Key Takeaways for Investors
- AI-led mix shift is real: AI Knowledge ARR +17% YoY and now 55% of SaaS ARR, supporting durable SaaS margin (78%) even as total revenue growth pauses; focus on timing of large deals as “AI office” scrutiny lengthens cycles .
- Near-term revenue headwinds are mechanical and mix-driven: intentional decline in PS attach (faster time-to-value), Q3 calendar-day headwind (~$0.33M), and non-recurring ~$0.6M usage revenue from Q2; these dampen near-term growth optics but improve scalability .
- Guidance reset lowers bar: FY25 revenue cut to $88.5–$90.0M and non-GAAP NI to $4.1–$4.7M; GAAP NI raised to $1.1–$1.7M with lower SBC and D&A; watch for execution against Q3 targets and cadence into Q4 .
- Cash generation and buybacks provide downside support: $6.4M OCF in Q2 and ongoing repurchases (~421K shares in Q2), with $70.5M cash enabling flexibility for continued investment and capital returns .
- Product cycle catalysts: eGain AI Agent launch this quarter and expanding enterprise AI Knowledge use-cases could re-accelerate bookings; monitor pilot conversions and scaling at marquee wins (airline, gaming, money transfer) .
- Risk-monitoring: Large-deal timing risk, PS revenue drag, and any renewed churn outside Conversation/Analytics legacy losses; RPO trends (total down 5% YoY but up 5% QoQ) and short-term RPO trajectory ($51M) are key signals .
- Trading setup: With lowered FY25 bar and intact AI margin profile, prints on large 7‑figure wins, AI Agent adoption, and stabilization of RPO/ARR should be incremental positives; disappointment on deal timing or additional guide cuts would be negatives .