Sign in
EP

ESSEX PROPERTY TRUST, INC. (ESS)·Q1 2025 Earnings Summary

Executive Summary

  • Core FFO per share was $3.97, up 3.7% YoY and $0.05 above the Q1 guidance midpoint, driven by stronger same-property revenue growth, better co-investment income, and lower interest expense; FY 2025 Core FFO guidance was reaffirmed .
  • Same-property revenues/NOI rose 3.4%/3.3% YoY (sequential +1.6%/+0.9%); delinquency improved to 0.5% of scheduled rent vs 1.3% in Q4 and Q1 2024, supporting blended net effective rent growth of 2.8% .
  • Portfolio repositioning skewed to higher-growth Northern California: $345.4M of NorCal acquisitions and a $127.0M SoCal disposition; development commenced on a 543-unit South San Francisco project; liquidity stood at ~ $1.4B; issued $400M 10-year notes at 5.375% .
  • Management would have raised Core FFO absent macro/policy uncertainty (tariffs, broader volatility), but reiterated Q2 blended rate growth of 2.5–3.5% and reaffirmed FY same-property growth ranges; near-term stock catalysts: sustained delinquency normalization, NorCal outperformance, and capital recycling execution .

What Went Well and What Went Wrong

What Went Well

  • Delinquency and rate trends: Same-property delinquency fell to 0.5% vs 1.3% in Q4 and Q1 2024; blended net effective rent growth was 2.8%, with new lease growth positive across all regions; management highlighted LA delinquency improvement from 3.9% to 1.3% YoY .
  • Regional performance: Northern California led with San Mateo up 5.2% YoY and San Francisco up 6.6% YoY; sequential revenue growth was +1.7% in both NorCal and SoCal .
  • Capital allocation and balance sheet: $345.4M NorCal buys, $127.0M SoCal sale; new $400M 2035 notes at 5.375% to address 2025 maturities; ~ $1.4B liquidity; small ATM forward issuance to support development, with discipline on pricing .

What Went Wrong

  • LA remains a drag: Management cited the need for further delinquency normalization and occupancy rebuilding before gaining pricing power; the film industry remains soft; wildfire impacts did not provide a tailwind to demand as unit mix mismatched displaced households .
  • Seattle expenses: Seattle saw higher operating expense pressure (YoY +7.7%), with same-property sequential NOI down 1.4% despite +1.0% revenue, reflecting supply-heavy 1H delivery cadence .
  • Non-GAAP optics versus prior year: GAAP EPS declined to $3.16 from $4.25 due to prior-year non-recurring gains; Core FFO growth was positive, but headline EPS optics were negative YoY .

Financial Results

MetricQ3 2024Q4 2024Q1 2025
Total Revenues ($USD Millions)$450.7 $454.5 $464.6
Net Income per Diluted Share ($)$1.84 $4.00 $3.16
FFO per Diluted Share ($)$3.81 $3.69 $3.97
Core FFO per Diluted Share ($)$3.91 $3.92 $3.97
Same-Property Revenue Growth YoY (%)3.5% 2.6% 3.4%

Regional same-property revenue growth YoY

RegionQ3 2024Q4 2024Q1 2025
Southern California4.1% 3.3% 3.8%
Northern California2.7% 2.0% 3.6%
Seattle Metro3.8% 2.1% 2.3%

KPIs (same-property unless noted)

KPIQ3 2024Q4 2024Q1 2025
Financial Occupancy (%)96.2% 95.9% 96.3%
New Lease Net Effective Rate Growth (%)0.5% -1.9% 1.0%
Renewal Net Effective Rate Growth (%)3.8% 3.8% 3.7%
Blended Net Effective Rate Growth (%)2.5% 1.6% 2.8%
Delinquency (% of scheduled rent)0.7% 1.3% (reported) 0.5%
Annualized Turnover (%)46% 37% 35%

Guidance Changes

MetricPeriodPrevious GuidanceCurrent GuidanceChange
Net Income per Diluted ShareFY 2025$5.79–$6.29 $9.19–$9.69 Raised
Total FFO per Diluted ShareFY 2025$15.56–$16.06 $15.56–$16.06 Maintained
Core FFO per Diluted ShareFY 2025$15.56–$16.06 $15.56–$16.06 Maintained
Same-Property Revenues (cash)FY 20252.25%–3.75% 2.25%–3.75% Maintained
Same-Property OpEx (cash)FY 20253.25%–4.25% 3.25%–4.25% Maintained
Same-Property NOI (cash)FY 20251.40%–4.00% 1.40%–4.00% Maintained
Core FFO per Diluted ShareQ2 2025—$3.90–$4.02 New
Blended Net Effective Rate GrowthQ2 2025—2.50%–3.50% New

Dividend: Raised 4.9% to $10.28 annualized, the 31st consecutive increase .

Earnings Call Themes & Trends

TopicQ-2 (Q3’24)Q-1 (Q4’24)Current (Q1’25)Trend
Blended rent growth cadenceQ3 blended +2.5%; set up for modest 4Q Q4 blended +1.6%; guided Q1 blended 2.0–3.0% Q1 blended +2.8%; Q2 guide 2.5–3.5% Improving/stable
Delinquency normalizationCash delinquency ~0.7% (prelim Oct) Reported 1.3% with non-cash AR cleanup 0.5%, near LT average; LA improved sharply Improving
Regional mix (NorCal vs LA)NorCal steady; LA lagging Similar dynamic; sequential revenues modest NorCal leading (San Mateo/SF), LA still rebuilding NorCal accelerating
Supply outlookDelay-adjusted supply ~0.5% of stock 2024–25 Similar supply framing 2025 supply “exceptionally low” at ~0.5% of stock Supportive
Policy/macro (tariffs, rates)Noted rate headwinds 2025 refinancing headwind ~2% FFO growth drag Held off raising guide due to policy opacity (tariffs) Cautious on macro
Regulatory (rent caps)——WA rent cap proposal akin to CA; minimal impact expected Manageable

Management Commentary

  • “Core FFO per share exceeded the midpoint of our guidance range... driven by lower delinquency and higher blended net effective rents... and favorable interest expense.” — CFO Barb Pak .
  • “Under normal circumstances, Essex would consider revising our guidance upward... we will be nimble... focused on maximizing revenues and generating long-term accretion.” — CEO Angela Kleiman .
  • “LA pricing power requires delinquency normalization and rebuilding occupancy... the film industry has not yet rebounded.” — CEO Angela Kleiman .
  • “South San Francisco development meets our return hurdles... we’d like to find more but will remain disciplined.” — Rylan Burns .
  • “April renewals were sent in the low 4s and landed in the high 3s, consistent with plan.” — CEO Angela Kleiman .

Q&A Highlights

  • Guidance cadence: Management reaffirmed full-year ranges; Q1 outperformance vs plan compresses the apparent Q2 step-up; would likely raise Core FFO if macro uncertainty abates .
  • Demand/tech: Monitoring top-20 tech job postings; trend has steadily improved since seasonal trough; RTO policy changes may add upside in NorCal .
  • Regional strategy: Push rents in NorCal; hold occupancy in SoCal given front-loaded supply; Seattle transitional due to 1H-heavy deliveries .
  • Capital markets: Small ATM forward to support development; $400M 10-year notes refinance 2025 maturities; over $1B liquidity retained .
  • Oakland: 75% of 2025 supply hits in 1H; expecting normalization thereafter; recent consolidation of an Oakland asset at ~$390K/unit, cap stepping to ~5% as concessions burn off .

Estimates Context

Q1 2025 actuals versus S&P Global consensus (company-reported metrics differ in taxonomy; see note):

MetricConsensusActualSurprise
Revenue ($USD Millions)$458.4*$477.8*+4.2%*
EPS Normalized ($)$1.407*$1.443*+2.6%*
EBITDA ($USD Millions)$308.3*$310.5*+0.7%*

Note: Values marked with * are retrieved from S&P Global; reported “revenue” taxonomy may differ from company 8-K totals.
S&P Global also shows Q2 2025 consensus revenue $466.2M* with company Q2 Core FFO guidance of $3.90–$4.02 .
Values retrieved from S&P Global.

Guidance Changes (Detail and Drivers)

  • Q1 Core FFO beat midpoint by $0.05 per share, driven by same-property revenue (+0.40pp vs plan), stronger co-investment NOI/preferred income, and favorable interest expense; management noted ~$1M one-time preferred equity interest in Q1 .
  • FY Core FFO unchanged ($15.56–$16.06) given macro/policy uncertainty; FY Net Income raised due to gain on sale dynamics and mix, while operating trajectory remains intact .
  • Q2 blended net effective rent guided to 2.5%–3.5% (consistent with plan), with sequential occupancy and pricing adjusted by region .

Key Takeaways for Investors

  • Core operations are re-accelerating with delinquency normalization (0.5%) and positive new lease growth across all regions; NorCal leads, LA still rebuilding .
  • The decision to hold FY Core FFO guidance appears conservative; watch for potential upward revision if macro/policy visibility improves by midyear .
  • Capital recycling favors higher-growth NorCal; development restart (7 South Linden) is disciplined and matched with selective equity and ample liquidity .
  • Q2 blended rent growth (2.5–3.5%) and further delinquency normalization are the near-term operational catalysts .
  • Balance sheet remains a strength (BBB+/Baa1, ~5.6x Net Debt/Adj. EBITDAre); manageable 2025 refinancing needs after $400M issuance .
  • Monitor LA’s path: delinquency → occupancy → pricing power; positive progress but timeline still developing .
  • Estimate drift likely modestly positive given Q1 beat and stable 2025 same-property ranges; be mindful of 2025 refinancing and structured finance redemption headwinds itemized in the company’s growth bridges .

Additional Detail and Data Points

  • Same-property revenue components (Q1’25 YoY): +2.1% scheduled rent; +0.7% delinquency benefit; +0.2% concessions; -0.1% vacancy; +0.5% other income .
  • Transactions YTD (Q1): The Plaza (307 units, Foster City), One Hundred Grand (166), ROEN Menlo Park (146); disposition of Highridge (255 units) in Rancho Palos Verdes; subsequent sale of Santa Ana (350 units, ~$685K/unit) .
  • Liquidity and leverage: ~ $1.4B liquidity; Net Indebtedness / Adjusted EBITDAre normalized 5.6x; Unencumbered NOI ~92% .