Sign in
EE

EXPAND ENERGY Corp (EXE)·Q4 2024 Earnings Summary

Executive Summary

  • Q4 2024 delivered strong operational execution with net production of 6.41 Bcfe/d (91% gas), Adjusted EBITDAX of $964M, and Adjusted EPS of $0.55, despite GAAP net loss driven by non‑cash derivative marks and merger‑related items .
  • 2025 outlook was enhanced: synergy capture raised to ~$400M (from ~$225M in prior outlook), full $500M now targeted by YE 2026 (pulled in from 2027), plan to produce ~7.1 Bcfe/d on ~$2.7B capex and invest incremental $300M to build ~300 MMcfe/d productive capacity for 2026; quarterly base dividend maintained at $0.575 and $500M debt reduction prioritized .
  • Strategic narrative centered on “productive capacity” to flex volumes with market conditions; management highlighted advantaged LNG corridor positioning (2.5 Bcf/d Gillis delivery by year‑end), improved Haynesville drilling performance (~9 fewer days and ~$1.5M lower cost per well vs legacy), and net debt projected to be < $4.5B by YE 2025 at current strip .
  • Stock reaction drivers: synergy acceleration, clear capital return framework (base dividend + variable/buybacks after $500M deleveraging), and LNG/power demand tailwinds, offset by derivative losses in GAAP and ongoing macro/storage sensitivity discussed on the call .

What Went Well and What Went Wrong

What Went Well

  • Accelerated synergy realization: management now expects ~$400M in 2025 and full $500M by YE 2026; CEO emphasized capital and operating efficiencies, including >20% improvement in Haynesville drilling performance (“cut nearly nine days and $1.5M in cost per well”) .
  • Marketing and LNG positioning: integrated portfolio fully optimized by Jan 1; expected 75% of marketed volumes to reach strategic markets in 2026, including 2.5 Bcf/d directly to the LNG corridor; “We have the assets, balance sheet and capital‑efficient operations to help meet this new demand” .
  • Returns framework and balance sheet: debuted $750M IG issuance at record spread (+132 bps to 10‑yr UST), base dividend maintained, $500M targeted debt reduction in 2025; “we expect to end 2025 with less than $4.5B in net debt” .

What Went Wrong

  • GAAP net loss of $399M in Q4, driven largely by unrealized derivative losses and merger‑related costs (Adjusted net income $131M vs GAAP loss) .
  • Free cash flow headwind in Q4 (FCF -$154M; Adjusted FCF $73M) as capex ramped and integration costs flowed; sequentially higher capex also reflected Haynesville/SW Appalachia activity .
  • Transportation and gathering costs elevated with scale and marketing volumes (G&P&T expense $556M in Q4), while derivative mark‑to‑market volatility remained a modeling complication (derivatives -$245M revenue impact in Q4) .

Financial Results

Core P&L Metrics (USD Millions; EPS $/share)

Periods ordered oldest → newest

MetricQ4 2023Q3 2024Q4 2024
Total Revenues and Other ($MM)$1,948 $648 $2,001
Natural Gas, Oil & NGL Revenues ($MM)$763 $407 $1,595
Marketing Revenues ($MM)$513 $193 $649
Derivative Gains (Losses) ($MM)$533 $46 $(245)
GAAP Net Income (Loss) ($MM)$569 $(114) $(399)
GAAP Diluted EPS ($/sh)$4.02 $(0.85) $(1.72)
Adjusted Net Income ($MM)$185 $22 $131
Adjusted Diluted EPS ($/sh)$1.31 $0.16 $0.55
Adjusted EBITDAX ($MM)$635 $365 $964
Adjusted EBITDAX Margin %32.6% (635/1,948) 56.3% (365/648) 48.2% (964/2,001)

Quarter-over-Quarter and Year-over-Year Changes

MetricQoQ (Q4’24 vs Q3’24)YoY (Q4’24 vs Q4’23)
Total Revenues and Other ($MM)+$1,353 (2,001–648) +$53 (2,001–1,948)
GAAP Diluted EPS ($/sh)-$0.87 (−1.72–−0.85) -$5.74 (−1.72–4.02)
Adjusted Diluted EPS ($/sh)+$0.39 (0.55–0.16) -$0.76 (0.55–1.31)
Adjusted EBITDAX ($MM)+$599 (964–365) +$329 (964–635)

Operational KPIs

KPIQ4 2023Q3 2024Q4 2024
Net Production (MMcfe/d)3,427 2,647 6,412
Gas Mix (%)n/a100% gas (legacy) 91% gas
Avg Realized Price ($/Mcfe, incl. derivatives)3.01 2.51 3.11
Cash from Ops ($MM)$470 $422 $382
Cash Capex ($MM)$379 $298 $536
Free Cash Flow ($MM, Non‑GAAP)$91 $124 $(154)
Adjusted Free Cash Flow ($MM, Non‑GAAP)$(39) $98 $73

Segment Production (Q4 2024)

SegmentNatural Gas (MMcf/d)Oil (MBbl/d)NGL (MBbl/d)Total (MMcfe/d)Realized Price
Haynesville2,3382,338$2.57/Mcf
Northeast Appalachia2,4252,425$2.34/Mcf
Southwest Appalachia1,06712851,649$3.42/Mcfe
Total5,83012856,412$2.70/Mcfe; realized $3.11/Mcfe incl. derivatives

Note: Q3 2024 reflected legacy production footprint (Marcellus 1,531 MMcf/d; Haynesville 1,116 MMcf/d) pre full merger integration .

Guidance Changes

MetricPeriodPrevious GuidanceCurrent GuidanceChange
Annual Synergy CaptureFY 2025~$225M (achieve $500M by YE 2027) ~$400M (achieve $500M by YE 2026) Raised; timeline pulled forward
ProductionFY 2025~7.0 Bcfe/d ~7.1 Bcfe/d Raised
Capital ExpendituresFY 2025~$2.7B ~$2.7B (plus $300M incremental 2H rigs) Maintained base; added $300M productive capacity build
Productive Capacity BuildFY 2025 (2H) → 2026 deliveryNot specified$300M incremental to add ~300 MMcfe/d capacity into 2026 New
Exit RateYE 2025Not specified~7.2 Bcfe/d exit New
Base Dividend2025$0.575/quarter $0.575/quarter (paid Mar 27, 2025) Maintained
Net Debt ReductionFY 2025Enhanced framework announced; specifics later $500M targeted reduction; expect < $4.5B net debt YE 2025 at strip Formalized and quantified

Earnings Call Themes & Trends

TopicPrevious Mentions (Q-2 and Q-1)Current Period (Q4 2024)Trend
Synergies & IntegrationQ3 2024: target lifted to $500M; ~$225M in 2025 ~$400M in 2025; full $500M by 2026; Haynesville drilling >20% improvement Acceleration; operational upside
LNG & Marketing StrategyQ3 2024: plan, IG rating, framework 2.5 Bcf/d to Gillis by YE; 75% volumes to strategic markets by 2026; building optimization capabilities; potential domestic power/industrial/LNG deals Strengthening positioning and capabilities
Productive Capacity PhilosophyQ3 2024: defer TILs, build DUC inventory Target ~7.5 Bcf/d in 2026 contingent on mid‑cycle $3.5–$4/MMBtu; optionality to curtail or hold back if needed Clear framework; counter‑cyclical stance
Balance Sheet & Capital ReturnsQ3 2024: IG upgrades; $1B buyback authorization Record‑spread IG issuance; base dividend; 75% of excess FCF to buybacks/variable dividends after $500M deleveraging Execution; consistent
Hedging StrategyPrior: hedge‑to‑wedge concept 50–60% first‑year hedged; collars/swaps mix; opportunistically lock higher prices as strip strengthened Disciplined; adaptive
Appalachia CapacityPrior: rig cadence and takeaway stability Appalachia capital supports existing capacity; growth focus in Haynesville; monitoring new infrastructure and in‑basin demand Stable; opportunistic
Macro/Storage & DemandPrior: general outlook Multi‑year view anchored to mid‑cycle pricing; storage draws accelerated timing; LNG utilization and power demand key variables Constructive but cautious

(“Q-2” unavailable via our document retrieval; trends reflect Q3 2024 and Q4 2024 documents .)

Management Commentary

  • “We now expect to achieve approximately $400,000,000 of our annual synergy target in 2025 and to capture the entire $500,000,000 target by year end 2026.”
  • “We expect to produce approximately 7.1 Bcf per day for a capital investment of approximately $2,700,000,000… invest an incremental $300,000,000 to build approximately 300,000,000 cubic feet per day of additional productive capacity” .
  • “At today’s prices, we expect to end 2025 with less than $4,500,000,000 in net debt.”
  • “Once the NG3 pipe is online, approximately 75% of our marketed volumes are expected to reach strategic markets, including 2.5 Bcf per day directly to the growing LNG corridor.”
  • “In the fourth quarter alone, we cut nearly nine days and $1,500,000 in cost per well from Southwestern’s legacy drilling performance.”

Q&A Highlights

  • Productive capacity and mid‑cycle optimization: Targeting ~7.5 Bcf/d in 2026 at $3.5–$4 Henry Hub; will flex capital and turn‑in‑line cadence based on market conditions; optionality to delay TILs or curtail if winter/macro disappoints .
  • LNG and marketing: Building optimization processes and risk framework; expect meaningful netback uplift from domestic optimization and potential longer‑term power/industrial/LNG agreements; 2.5 Bcf/d capacity to Gillis by YE .
  • Activity cadence and wells: Brought ~40 wells online in Q4 (≈25 deferred TILs); plan ~90 wells in Q1; exit March ~7.0 Bcf/d; deferred TILs extinguished by 1H 2025; DUC activation ratable with flexibility .
  • Capex and infrastructure: No material step‑change needed to support moving from 7.5 to 8+ Bcf/d; existing gathering/transport sufficient; rigs added cadence in 2H across Haynesville and Appalachia .
  • Hedging: 50–60% of near‑term year hedged; collars earlier, willing to use swaps as prices rise; increase hedge levels when prices above marginal breakevens .

Estimates Context

  • Wall Street consensus (S&P Global) for Q4 2024 EPS/Revenue/EBITDA was unavailable due to data access limits at time of request; therefore, estimate comparisons are not included. Values would be retrieved from S&P Global when accessible.
  • Implication: Sell‑side models should reassess for (a) higher 2025 synergy capture (~$400M vs ~$225M prior), (b) production trajectory to ~7.1 Bcfe/d in 2025 with exit ~7.2, (c) incremental $300M productive capacity investment, and (d) stronger LNG/power demand linkage .

Key Takeaways for Investors

  • Near‑term: The synergy acceleration and clear productive‑capacity plan are positive catalysts; watch LNG corridor ramp (LEAP/NG3) and Q1/Q2 well TIL cadence for production trajectory toward ~7.1 Bcfe/d .
  • Medium‑term: Optionality to deliver ~7.5 Bcf/d in 2026 at mid‑cycle prices while maintaining balance‑sheet discipline (<$4.5B net debt) and returns framework (base dividend + variable/buybacks) .
  • Profitability quality: Adjusted EBITDAX expanded to $964M; derivative volatility and integration costs impacted GAAP—focus on non‑GAAP reconciliations and underlying cash metrics .
  • Operational execution: Haynesville efficiency gains (>20% improvement) and longer laterals/hybrid designs in Appalachia support lower breakevens and normalized returns across zones .
  • Marketing uplift: Expect incremental netback improvements from domestic optimization and potential long‑term commercial arrangements (LNG/power/industrial); execution risk mitigated by new leadership and process build‑out .
  • Macro sensitivity: Strategy anchored to counter‑cyclical discipline; if LNG utilization and power growth exceed expectations, upside to productive capacity could be underwritten at >$4 pricing; if not, company will flex capital/TILs .
  • Monitoring items: Storage trajectory, LNG utilization, rig/DUC trends in the gas complex, Appalachia takeaway developments, hedge posture (swaps vs collars) .

Notes on non‑GAAP

Adjusted EPS, Adjusted Net Income, Adjusted EBITDAX, FCF and Adjusted FCF are non‑GAAP measures; reconciliations are provided in the press release exhibits . Merger‑related costs and derivative MTM are key adjustments in Q4.