FLUSHING FINANCIAL CORP (FFIC)·Q1 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Core profitability improved despite a GAAP loss: Core EPS was $0.23 vs GAAP EPS of ($0.29), driven by 12 bps GAAP and 24 bps core NIM expansion QoQ as cost of funds fell 22 bps; the GAAP loss reflects a non‑cash, non‑tax‑deductible goodwill impairment of $17.6M ($0.51/sh) with no impact on regulatory capital .
- Credit headwinds modestly worsened but remain manageable: NPLs rose to 69 bps of loans (from 49 bps in Q4’24) largely due to one multifamily relationship; criticized/classified loans increased to 133 bps, driven by one office credit that lost its primary tenant; NCOs were 27 bps, down from 28 bps in Q4’24 .
- Liquidity and capital stable: Average deposits +6.8% YoY (+1.5% QoQ) to $7.56B; TCE/TA was 7.79% (vs 7.82% in Q4’24) with $4.0B of undrawn liquidity resources; dividend of $0.22/sh paid in Q1 .
- Near-term catalysts: trajectory of NIM expansion (loan repricing and deposit costs), resolution of identified MF/office credits, SBA ramp and BOLI actions, and operating leverage vs expense growth guidance; management reiterated 2025 expense growth and tax rate ranges, with continued focus on remixing funding and contractual loan repricing through 2027 .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
-
What Went Well
- “GAAP and Core Net Interest Margins expanded by 12 and 24 basis points QoQ, respectively… cost of funds declining 22 bps to 3.13%,” highlighting tangible core spread improvement despite an inverted curve .
- Average deposits grew 6.8% YoY and 1.5% QoQ; noninterest-bearing period-end deposits +5.9% YoY and +3.2% QoQ; uninsured and uncollateralized deposits remain low at 16% of total .
- Loan repricing pipeline supports future NIM: ~$511M to reprice +171 bps in 2025, ~$706M +190 bps in 2026; management estimates +$9M 2025 and +$13M 2026 annualized NII from repricing, cumulatively ~$50M over three years .
-
What Went Wrong
- GAAP loss ($9.8M) from non‑cash goodwill impairment ($17.6M, $0.51/sh), overshadowing underlying core profitability; impairment had no regulatory capital impact .
- Asset quality softened: NPLs rose to 69 bps (vs 49 bps in Q4’24), criticized/classified to 133 bps (vs 107 bps), tied to a multifamily relationship and an office credit (lost primary tenant) .
- Core noninterest expenses up 5.4% YoY (though down 1.9% QoQ); full-year 2025 noninterest expense expected to rise 5–8% as FFIC invests in branch expansion and SBA build-out .
Financial Results
KPI and Balance Sheet Snapshot
Estimates Comparison (S&P Global)
Values marked with * retrieved from S&P Global via GetEstimates. S&P may use normalized definitions that differ from GAAP or company “core” reporting.
Context: Company reported GAAP EPS of ($0.29) due to goodwill impairment; Core EPS was $0.23, aligning with the S&P “actual” EPS figure above .
Drivers vs estimates: Core EPS modestly beat on stronger NIM and deposit cost relief; “Revenue” per S&P was slightly below consensus, noting definitional differences for banks .
Guidance Changes
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- “Our GAAP and Core Net Interest Margins expanded by 12 and 24 basis points QoQ… Although we recorded a non-cash goodwill impairment charge of $17.6 million… this accounting adjustment has no impact on our regulatory capital ratios or liquidity position… TCE/TA stands at 7.79%” — John R. Buran, President & CEO .
- “We expect further net interest margin expansion as real estate loans contractually reprice higher… cost of funds declined 22 bps QoQ… a positively sloped yield curve will drive net interest margin expansion” — Susan K. Cullen, SEVP & CFO .
- “We have ample liquidity with $4 billion of undrawn lines… uninsured and uncollateralized deposits at 16%… company and bank remain well capitalized” — Susan K. Cullen .
- “We expect to expand our branch network in these [Asian] markets during 2025… Jackson Heights branch opening in early May and a second Chinatown branch later this year” — John R. Buran .
Q&A Highlights
- Expenses: 2025 expense guide unchanged (+5–8%); Q1 seasonal comp largely offset by nonrecurring adjustments; run-rate similar going forward .
- Credit specifics: MF NPL uptick from one relationship (3 loans) with ~43% LTV; no specific reserve due to low LTV; criticized/classified increase tied to an office condo loan whose largest tenant moved out; borrower cooperative; active leasing activity .
- NIM outlook: Too volatile to quantify near-term; moving parts include loan repricing and CD rates; CRE repricing seen as a key opportunity under current rate environment .
- Deposits: ~$602M CDs at 4.16% maturing in Q2; rates offered 3.5%–4.25%; May 1 move to 4% on 3‑mo CD clarified .
- SBA build: Pipeline building; gain-on-sale premiums around ~7% for term loans .
- Reserves: Expect some reserve build given macro uncertainty (including tariffs) .
- Seasonality: Certain deposit categories show seasonal strength in Q1 that may reverse in summer .
Estimates Context
- Core EPS beat: Core EPS $0.23 vs S&P Primary EPS consensus $0.21 (beat $0.02); reported GAAP EPS was ($0.29) due to goodwill impairment . Primary EPS “actual” per S&P aligns with normalized/core basis rather than GAAP loss in this quarter’s case ($0.23 vs -$0.29) .
- Revenue slight miss: S&P “Revenue” $53.75M vs $55.38M consensus (miss $1.63M). Note: S&P’s bank “revenue” definitions may differ from sum of net interest income + noninterest income presented by the company. Values retrieved from S&P Global*.
Where estimates may adjust: modest upward revisions to out‑quarter NII/NIM trajectories given deposit cost relief and contractual repricing; potential modest credit cost upward bias near term given identified MF/office items and management’s caution on reserve build .
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Core profitability is inflecting as funding costs roll down and contractual loan repricing kicks in; sustained NIM expansion hinges on the yield curve slope and continued CD repricing discipline .
- GAAP loss is non‑economic and driven by a one‑time goodwill impairment with no capital impact; tangible capital and leverage ratios remain solid, supporting flexibility .
- Credit normalization is emerging but idiosyncratic and well‑collateralized (low LTVs, strong DSCRs); watch the resolution cadence on the identified MF relationship and the office credit .
- 2025 opex growth (5–8%) is a known headwind but targeted to drive operating leverage via Asian market branch expansion, SBA ramp, and relationship pricing initiatives .
- Liquidity position (low uninsured/unsecured deposits, $4B undrawn) reduces tail risk and supports deposit remixing and growth initiatives .
- Tactical catalysts: monthly/quarterly NIM prints vs deposit repricing, visibility on loan repricing retention rates, SBA gain-on-sale contribution, and any discrete credit resolutions; guidance cadence on tax rate and expenses remains supportive .
- Near to medium term, the narrative is shifting toward margin recovery and franchise growth (Asian markets, SBA) while managing through a modest credit blip—positive setup if the curve steepens or stabilizes and deposit betas remain favorable .
Additional materials reviewed:
- Q1 2025 8‑K and press release, including full statistical tables –.
- Q1 2025 earnings call (full transcript) –.
- Prior quarter calls for trend context: Q4 2024 –; Q3 2024 –.
Notes: No standalone additional Q1’25 press releases beyond the 8‑K exhibit were found in the document catalog.