Sign in

Lisa Glatch

Director at FLUORFLUOR
Board

About Lisa Glatch

Independent director of Fluor Corporation since 2024 (age 62), with 35+ years in energy, chemicals, environmental, mining, water and transportation across senior roles at Sempra Infrastructure/Sempra LNG, CH2M, Jacobs, and Fluor. Completed NACD Cyber-Risk Oversight Program and earned the CERT Certificate in Cyber-Risk Oversight, adding board-level cybersecurity expertise . Independent under NYSE and company standards; nominated to continue service to 2026 .

Past Roles

OrganizationRoleTenureCommittees/Impact
Sempra InfrastructurePresident, LNG and Net Zero Solutions2021–2022Led LNG and decarbonization initiatives
Sempra LNGPresident & Chief Operating Officer2019–2021Oversaw LNG operations and growth
Sempra EnergyStrategic Initiatives Officer2018–2019Corporate strategy and special projects
CH2M (now Jacobs)Senior executive roles (BD/Operations/Project Mgmt)Not disclosedGlobal infra/industrial execution
Jacobs Solutions Inc.Senior executive rolesNot disclosedOperations and project delivery
FluorSenior executive rolesNot disclosedEPC operations background

External Roles

OrganizationRoleTenureCommittees/Impact
Hess CorporationDirectorCurrentNot disclosed
Xylem Inc.DirectorCurrentNot disclosed
Evoqua Water Technologies Corp.DirectorFormerNot disclosed
Infraestructura Energética Nova, S.A.B. de C.V. (IEnova)DirectorFormerNot disclosed

Board Governance

  • Independence: Yes; Audit and Commercial Strategies & Operational Risk Committees are fully independent; Board has nine independent nominees .
  • Attendance: Board met six times in 2024; each director attended all Board and relevant committee meetings; four executive sessions held .
  • Committee assignments:
    • Audit Committee member
    • Commercial Strategies & Operational Risk Committee member
  • Board limits: Directors capped at four total public company boards; nominees are in compliance; Glatch serves on two external boards plus Fluor (three total) .
Governance ItemStatus
IndependenceIndependent
Lead Independent DirectorJames T. Hackett (three-year term to Jan 2028)
Executive Sessions4 in 2024
Audit Committee Financial OversightAudit charter includes cybersecurity and sustainability disclosure control oversight
Cyber CredentialNACD CERT in Cyber-Risk Oversight

Fixed Compensation

Component2024 AmountNotes
Annual Board Cash Retainer$130,000 Paid quarterly
Committee Chair FeesN/ANot a chair
Lead Independent Director FeeN/ANot applicable
Director RSUs (Annual)$170,005 Vested immediately at grant
Additional RSUs (Prorated on appointment)Included in total stock awardsProrated grant at appointment (valued at $38.49/share)
Total Stock Awards$226,701 Sum of annual + prorated grants
All Other Compensation$140 Life insurance premium
Total 2024 Director Compensation$356,841

Director stock ownership guideline: 5× annual cash retainer, to be met within five years (i.e., $650,000 equivalent value) . RSUs for non-management directors vest immediately upon grant; directors may elect to defer RSUs/fees; the company does not guarantee returns on deferrals .

Performance Compensation

  • Structure: Non-management director equity is RSUs that vest immediately; no performance-based equity or options for directors as of year-end 2024 .
  • Performance metrics tied to director pay: None disclosed (director RSUs are time-based and immediately vested) .
MetricApplies to Director Equity?Notes
Financial targets (EBITDA/EBT/TSR)NoUsed for executive LTI, not director comp
Vesting ConditionsImmediateRSUs vest at grant for directors

Other Directorships & Interlocks

  • Current boards: Hess Corporation and Xylem Inc. .
  • Board service within limit (≤4 public boards): In compliance per Governance Committee review; Glatch at three (including Fluor) .
  • Related-party transactions: None requiring disclosure; Governance Committee policy prohibits approving transactions inconsistent with stockholder interests .

Expertise & Qualifications

  • 35+ years in BD/operations/project management across energy, LNG, infrastructure, water, and industrial sectors; background in both public and private sectors .
  • Board-level cybersecurity oversight credential (NACD CERT) .
  • Experience aligning with Fluor’s client base transitioning to sustainable infrastructure and energy solutions .

Equity Ownership

HoldingAmountPercent of OutstandingNotes
Beneficially Owned Shares5,680 <1% Includes shares acquirable within 60 days per SEC rules
Unvested Director Stock/Options (12/31/2024)None N/ANon-employee directors held no unvested awards at year-end 2024
Hedging/PledgingProhibited N/AApplies to directors and employees
Ownership Guideline5× cash retainer N/ACompliance not individually disclosed

Governance Assessment

  • Strengths:

    • Independent director with deep sectoral operating experience (energy/LNG/infra) and board-level cyber credential; enhances Audit Committee risk oversight .
    • 100% attendance at Board and committee meetings in 2024; strong engagement .
    • Board and committees (other than Executive) fully independent; robust governance practices (majority voting, proxy access, special meeting rights) bolster investor confidence .
    • Director equity and ownership guidelines align interests with stockholders; immediate vesting RSUs and 5× cash retainer guideline .
  • Potential flags / monitoring:

    • One Form 4 late filing for Glatch due to administrative error; minor process control issue to monitor for recurrence (RED FLAG – compliance optics) .
    • External board service at Hess and Xylem creates potential for real or perceived interlocks if Fluor engages commercially with those companies; however, Fluor reports no related-person transactions requiring disclosure, and the Governance Committee pre-approval framework is in place .
    • Director equity for non-management directors is not performance-conditioned; alignment relies on ownership and market exposure rather than explicit performance metrics .
  • Investor signals:

    • Strong say-on-pay support (92% in 2024) and enhanced LTI TSR weighting in 2025 suggest responsiveness to shareholders on pay-for-performance; while executive-focused, it reflects broader governance discipline .