Sign in

    Flowserve Corp (FLS)

    Q1 2025 Earnings Summary

    Reported on Apr 30, 2025 (After Market Close)
    Pre-Earnings Price$45.23Last close (Apr 30, 2025)
    Post-Earnings Price$45.79Open (May 1, 2025)
    Price Change
    $0.56(+1.24%)
    • Strong Aftermarket and Nuclear Order Book: The executives highlighted record aftermarket bookings of $690 million in Q1 and consistently strong nuclear orders (over $100 million for three consecutive quarters), which underpin the robust backlog and provide clear revenue visibility, even amid macro uncertainties.
    • Effective Pricing and Margin Management: The company’s proactive pricing actions—including an early-year price increase and an additional rise in March—demonstrate its ability to mitigate the impact of tariffs. This, combined with the benefit of the 80/20 operational strategy, supports margin expansion and sustainable earnings growth.
    • Successful Mogas Integration: The management expressed strong confidence in the Mogas segment, noting that its integration is ahead of pace and already accretive to earnings, with clear synergy targets and potential for accelerated margin improvement over 2025.
    • Tariff Exposure and Mitigation Timing Mismatch: With an estimated $90–$100 million unmitigated annual tariff impact , there is a risk that the pricing actions and supply chain repositioning may not align perfectly in timing. This could lead to margin pressure in the latter half of 2025, especially for segments like FCD that have greater tariff exposure.
    • Macroeconomic Uncertainty Affecting Backlog and Project Bookings: Executives noted that if the global macroeconomic environment worsens, there could be a slowdown in the second half as customers delay capital expenditures. This uncertainty makes it difficult to sustain the current elevated book-to-bill ratio of 1.07x , potentially impacting future earnings.
    • Customer Resistance to Price Increases: Although the company has implemented price increases to offset higher costs, there remains uncertainty about the stickiness of these prices and potential customer pushback, particularly on the aftermarket and OE segments. If customers negotiate hard on change orders or fail to accept new pricing levels, it could further compress margins.
    MetricYoY ChangeReason

    Total Revenue

    +5% (from $1,087.5M to $1,144.5M)

    Revenue increased due to overall stronger sales performance in Q1 2025, with both original equipment and aftermarket segments contributing to the growth compared to Q1 2024. This builds on previous period gains driven by improved pricing and volume trends.

    Flow Control Division Revenue

    +14%+ (from $318.7M to $364.1M)

    A robust rise in the Flow Control Division revenue reflects significantly higher customer orders and increased bookings, which built on the prior period’s performance. Strategic initiatives and favorable market demand in energy and industrial segments contributed to the strong 14%+ growth.

    Flowserve Pumps Division Revenue

    +1.9% (from $768.8M to $783.1M)

    Modest growth within the Pumps Division indicates steadier performance relative to the higher growth observed in Flow Control. This slower pace suggests that while customer demand persisted, competitive or market saturation factors may have limited further revenue expansion compared to previous period gains.

    Asia Pacific Revenue

    +11% (from $182.7M to $202.72M)

    Asia Pacific revenue surged by nearly 11%, driven by increased customer sales and strategic pricing and volume initiatives carried forward from FY 2024. This enhanced regional performance reflects continued market strength in a previously improving region.

    Latin America Revenue

    +9% (from $75.4M to $82.345M)

    Revenue in Latin America grew by about 9% as a result of a diversified customer base and robust demand in key industries. This growth builds on the previous period’s momentum generated from increased aftermarket and original equipment orders.

    North America Revenue

    +6% (from $439.5M to $466.513M)

    North America experienced a 6% increase driven by higher orders in the energy, power, and general industries sectors, consistent with prior improvements in customer sales. Though the region built on positive trends, modest gains suggest that market growth remained steady rather than explosive.

    Europe Revenue

    -4% (from $207.4M to $198.482M)

    European revenue declined by about 4%, in stark contrast to other regions. The decrease may be attributed to challenging market conditions or unfavorable currency effects impacting the region, marking a reversal from the prior period’s positive growth trends.

    Net Cash Flows from Operating Activity

    From +$62,257K to -$49,934K (drastic deterioration)

    Operating cash flows witnessed a dramatic swing due to increased cash usage from working capital components such as accounts receivable, contract assets, and a notable decrease in accounts payable and accrued liabilities. This reversal from the positive performance in Q1 2024 highlights operational challenges faced in Q1 2025.

    Net Earnings

    +2.0% (from $77,915K to $79,457K; attributable $73,905K)

    Net earnings grew modestly by about 2%, which can be linked to higher gross profit margins, favorable gains (such as improved foreign currency translation results) and increased affiliate earnings, even as higher SG&A expenses and other cost pressures partially offset these improvements compared to Q1 2024.

    Cash and Cash Equivalents

    -20% (from $675,441K to $540,804K)

    A nearly 20% decline in liquidity was driven by a combination of lower operating cash inflows and significant cash outflows from financing activities (dividend payments, share repurchases, and contingent consideration payments) as well as capital expenditures during Q1 2025 compared to the prior quarter-end.

    MetricPeriodPrevious GuidanceCurrent GuidanceChange

    Organic Growth

    FY 2025

    3% to 5%

    3% to 5%

    no change

    Adjusted EPS

    FY 2025

    $3.10 to $3.30

    $3.10 to $3.30

    no change

    Full-Year Cash Flow to Adjusted Net Earnings

    FY 2025

    no prior guidance

    90% or more

    no prior guidance

    Currency Translation Impact

    FY 2025

    no prior guidance

    100 basis point headwind to roughly neutral

    no prior guidance

    Tariff Impact

    FY 2025

    no prior guidance

    tariff rates communicated to date remain in place

    no prior guidance

    General Economic Conditions

    FY 2025

    no prior guidance

    general economic conditions and flow control demand remain steady

    no prior guidance

    Quarterly Performance Expectations

    Q2 2025

    no prior guidance

    expected to deliver results similar or slightly better than Q1 2025, with modest YoY top-line growth and margin expansion – incremental margins slightly lower than Q1

    no prior guidance

    MetricPeriodGuidanceActualPerformance
    Sales
    Q1 2025
    Similar to Q1 2024
    1,144.543
    Met
    Earnings
    Q1 2025
    Similar to Q1 2024
    79,457
    Met
    TopicPrevious MentionsCurrent PeriodTrend

    Aftermarket Performance and Bookings

    In Q2, Q3 and Q4 2024, Flowserve consistently emphasized strong aftermarket bookings with levels above $600 million, record levels in Q2 and consistent pricing power and service excellence.

    Q1 2025 highlighted record aftermarket bookings of $690 million, marking the fourth consecutive quarter above $600 million with enhanced pricing power and strong aftermarket capture.

    Consistent strength with incremental improvement and enhanced pricing power.

    Nuclear and Power Order Pipeline

    In Q2, Q3 and Q4 2024, the company reported robust nuclear orders and power bookings with increasing year‐over‐year growth, strong project funnels, and diversified energy mix.

    Q1 2025 continued to show sustained nuclear bookings (exceeding $100 million) along with significant nuclear and power order wins, reinforcing a robust pipeline.

    Steady and robust growth with continued pipeline expansion.

    Pricing Strategy and Margin Management (80/20 Framework)

    Q2 2024 mentioned a normalized 4–5% price increase and early initiatives, Q3 2024 detailed the portfolio excellence approach with systematic price adjustments, and Q4 2024 expanded on the 80/20 framework for complexity reduction and margin improvement.

    In Q1 2025, Flowserve emphasized both the annual and an additional pricing increase (driven by tariffs) while reinforcing the 80/20 framework to secure significant margin expansion.

    Increasing emphasis on disciplined pricing and tighter margin management initiatives.

    Mogas Integration and Acquisition Challenges

    Q3 2024 reported the initial integration of Mogas with synergy targets and revenue opportunities while Q4 2024 discussed shipment timing issues and modest margin impacts.

    Q1 2025 noted that the Mogas integration is progressing ahead of schedule, with early earnings accretion and clear synergy targets to drive margin improvement.

    Smooth integration with accelerated synergy realization and improved earnings outlook.

    Tariff and Geopolitical Risks

    Q4 2024 addressed repositioning the supply chain and moderate historical tariff impacts, while Q2 and Q3 2024 had little to no discussion on this topic.

    Q1 2025 provided explicit details on new tariffs—estimating a gross impact of $90–$100 million annually—and outlined proactive mitigation strategies including price increases and supply chain adjustments.

    Elevated focus with proactive risk mitigation measures compared to previous periods.

    Macroeconomic Uncertainty and Seasonality Challenges

    Q2 2024 discussed seasonality minimization efforts and margin focus, Q3 2024 touched indirectly on smoothing quarterly results, and Q4 2024 referenced seasonality in guidance assumptions.

    Q1 2025 offered detailed discussion on macroeconomic uncertainty, highlighting a robust backlog of $2.9 billion, clear demand signals, and explicit seasonality challenges for upcoming quarters.

    Enhanced clarity and active management of external economic challenges.

    Declining OE Bookings in FCD Segment

    Q3 2024 noted a less favorable mix in OE bookings in FCD, prompting a focus on margin expansion, while Q2 2024 did not mention any declines and Q4 2024 reported an 8% rise in OE bookings.

    Q1 2025 did not emphasize any decline; instead, growth in FCD bookings was reported with a 7% increase in OE bookings, indicating a recovery in the segment.

    Shift from prior mix challenges toward improved booking performance and reduced emphasis on declines.

    Execution Risks in Margin Expansion Initiatives

    Q2 2024 described operational and product excellence initiatives with margin targets, while Q3 2024 expressed cautious optimism and Q4 2024 highlighted phased margin improvements and integration challenges.

    Q1 2025 detailed specific execution risks including tariff-related timing mismatches, greater exposure in FCD, and risks around backlog repricing, emphasizing the need for stringent execution of margin initiatives.

    Heightened focus on managing short-term execution risks alongside long-term margin expansion plans.

    New Cryogenic Pump Acquisition for LNG Markets

    Q2 2024 discussed the acquisition of cryogenic pump technology from NexGen, outlining product development, testing, and its potential to generate significant annual revenue. Q4 2024 emphasized commercialization progress and aftermarket opportunities in LNG.

    There is no mention of the new cryogenic pump acquisition in the Q1 2025 call.

    Absent in Q1 2025, indicating a possible strategic shift or integration phase completion.

    Emerging Decarbonization Initiatives

    Q2 2024 described a broad suite of decarbonization projects (hydrogen technology, molecular recycling, LNG, etc.), Q3 2024 highlighted a nuclear power project in the UK, and Q4 2024 emphasized significant decarbonization bookings and technology breakthroughs.

    Q1 2025 reaffirmed the company’s commitment to decarbonization with ongoing support for nuclear, carbon capture, and LNG projects, indicating stable long-term focus.

    Sustained and evolving focus, consolidating initiatives for cleaner energy transitions.

    Customer Resistance to Price Increases

    Q2 2024 noted that the pricing environment had normalized with minimal resistance due to improved cost inflation and selective bidding, while Q3 and Q4 2024 did not emphasize this topic.

    Q1 2025 mentioned that although there is some negotiation on change orders, there is less resistance in the aftermarket and confidence in customer acceptance of price increases.

    Reduced customer pushback, facilitating smoother pricing adjustments.

    1. Tariff Mitigation
      Q: How will tariffs be mitigated?
      A: Management expects to offset about 50% of the $90–100 million annual tariff impact using price actions and supply chain repositioning, leveraging regional manufacturing and the 80/20 program.

    2. Margin Expansion
      Q: What margins are expected for 2025?
      A: They project overall operating margin expansion of at least 100 basis points year-over-year, with FPD delivering record performance and FCD improving despite higher tariff exposure.

    3. Bookings Sustainability
      Q: Are current bookings sustainable?
      A: Q1 showcased robust bookings—including $690 million in aftermarket—with a healthy project funnel, though a potential slowdown in the second half is noted if uncertainties persist.

    4. EPS Outlook
      Q: What is the Q2 outlook?
      A: Q2 is expected to mirror or slightly improve on Q1, fueled by strong backlog conversion and timely price adjustments that support the EPS trajectory.

    5. Pricing Strategy
      Q: How have customers reacted to price increases?
      A: With a global manufacturing footprint, management notes that timely price hikes in January and March were generally accepted, as customers value reliable, on-time delivery.

    6. Backlog Price Adjustments
      Q: How is backlog repricing handled?
      A: They use negotiated change orders on existing contracts to adjust pricing for macro cost pressures, ensuring that tariff impacts are absorbed effectively.

    7. Aftermarket vs OE Pricing
      Q: How do pricing dynamics differ?
      A: Aftermarket pricing proves stickier due to critical delivery timelines, while original equipment project prices are more variable and negotiated, though both strategies are used to counter cost challenges.

    8. Mogas Integration
      Q: How is the Mogas integration progressing?
      A: The integration is advancing ahead of schedule, with Mogas already accretive to earnings through strong MRO margins and expected further synergies over 2025.

    9. Project Pipeline Visibility
      Q: How visible are future project orders?
      A: There is solid visibility for near-term projects up to a year ahead, with nuclear orders offering extended visibility of up to 2 years, reducing pushout concerns.

    10. Timing of Margin Pressure
      Q: When is margin pressure expected?
      A: Most margin pressure from tariff adjustments is anticipated in the third to fourth quarters, as earlier quarter inventories help buffer initial costs.

    11. Distributor Inventory
      Q: Have distributors pre-bought inventory?
      A: Distributors have shown only limited prebuy activity, indicating no material stockpiling before the recent price increases.

    12. Capacity Expansion
      Q: Is new capacity needed for nuclear orders?
      A: They plan to boost capacity via process improvements and staffing within existing facilities, avoiding significant new capital investments.

    13. Decarbonization Query
      Q: How are decarbonization projects performing?
      A: Decarbonization efforts, including LNG and carbon capture initiatives, continue steadily with robust 3D bookings, despite shifting policy signals.

    14. Macro Guidance Assumptions
      Q: How do macro factors affect guidance?
      A: Guidance incorporates today’s economic conditions and tariff risks, with expected EPS growth of 18–25%, balancing price hikes against potential volume declines.

    15. Backlog Conversion Efficiency
      Q: What drove strong backlog conversion?
      A: Effective operational execution—hitting engineering milestones and exceeding customer expectations—has led to impressive backlog conversion, reinforcing revenue outlook.