FS
FIVE STAR BANCORP (FSBC)·Q2 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- EPS of $0.68 beat Wall Street consensus by $0.045, driven by stronger net interest income and higher average loan yields, while S&P-defined “Revenue” missed by ~$1.8M; NIM expanded 8 bps to 3.53% and efficiency improved to 41.03% . EPS Actual vs Consensus: $0.68 vs $0.635*; Revenue Actual vs Consensus: $35.83M* vs $37.64M* (definitions differ; see Estimates Context) [GetEstimates]*.
- Organic growth continued: loans +$136.2M QoQ (+3.76%) and deposits +$158.3M (+4.24%); non-interest-bearing deposits rose to 25.78% of total, and short-term borrowings remained zero .
- Asset quality remained strong (NPLs/loans 0.06%), capital ratios well above well-capitalized thresholds, and liquidity ~$2.15B immediately available .
- Catalysts: Bay Area expansion (Walnut Creek opening in Q3), new Food & Agribusiness vertical, and management guidance for Q3 expense run-rate (+$0.5–$0.75M) and lower effective tax rate (~26.65%) .
Values retrieved from S&P Global for all items marked with an asterisk (*).
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
What Went Well
- Net interest income rose 7.47% QoQ to $36.515M on loan growth and loan yield improvement; NIM increased to 3.53% (+8 bps QoQ; +14 bps YoY) .
- Deposits grew +$158.3M QoQ (+4.24%) led by new money market accounts (+$87.4M) and new non-interest-bearing accounts (+$68.7M); non-wholesale deposits increased +$191.6M .
- CEO: “exceptional quarter… organic growth strategy fueled new account openings” and highlighted technology, operating efficiencies, conservative underwriting, and concierge banking approach .
What Went Wrong
- S&P-defined “Revenue” missed consensus despite strong NIM expansion (actual $35.83M* vs $37.64M*), reflecting differences in revenue definitions versus bank-reported components [GetEstimates]* .
- Provision for credit losses increased QoQ to $2.5M due to loan growth and higher net charge-offs, with one CRE loan placed on nonaccrual (NPLs/loans 0.06%) .
- Non-interest expense rose +$0.68M QoQ (+4.53%) driven by business travel, conferences, training, and promotional expenses tied to expansion .
Financial Results
Values retrieved from S&P Global for Revenue (*).
Estimate comparison and surprise:
Values retrieved from S&P Global for all consensus and “Revenue” actuals (*).
Segment/KPI details:
Guidance Changes
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- CEO: “We are very pleased to report an exceptional quarter… growth in loans and deposits. Net interest margin increased by eight basis points to 3.53%, while our efficiency ratio decreased to 41.03%” .
- CEO: Bay Area momentum—“We look forward to… Walnut Creek… team has grown to 34 employees with $456.9 million in deposits” .
- CFO: “Net interest income increased $2.5 million… due to a $3.5 million increase in interest income… partially offset by a $1 million increase in interest expense” .
Q&A Highlights
- Core deposit growth sustainability: Management views non-interest-bearing growth as sustainable, driven by new relationships across geographies and verticals .
- Bay Area strategy: Walnut Creek opening; potential South Bay expansion; improving business environment in San Francisco .
- Efficiency ratio outlook: Sub-40% possible given operating leverage; continued investments in talent and back-office support .
- Expense run-rate: Expect +$0.5–$0.75M in Q3 with Walnut Creek bringing incremental costs .
- Loan purchases: Maintaining ~$300M average outstanding in purchased consumer loans; ~$44M purchases in Q2 to sustain balance .
- Loan yield expansion: Repricing of 2020 vintages and new production at 7.03% drove 7 bps loan yield improvement QoQ .
Estimates Context
- EPS: FSBC beat consensus for Q2 2025 (Actual $0.68 vs $0.635*) and prior quarter Q1 2025 (Actual $0.62 vs $0.59*), with drivers including higher net interest income and margin expansion [GetEstimates]*.
- Revenue: Using S&P’s “Revenue” definition, Q2 2025 actual $35.83M* missed consensus $37.64M*; note that bank-reported net interest income plus non-interest income totals $38.33M, indicating definitional differences between S&P “Revenue” and FSBC’s reported components [GetEstimates]*.
- Implications: Sell-side models may raise EPS and NIM assumptions; revenue line may require reconciliation to definition (net interest income vs total revenue) and could constrain top-line prints despite margin strength.
Values retrieved from S&P Global for all items marked with an asterisk (*).
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Margin expansion and operating leverage are intact: NIM 3.53% with efficiency ratio 41.03% suggest earnings power supports upside to EPS even with modest opex growth .
- Deposit franchise strengthening: Core deposit growth and improved non-interest-bearing mix reduce funding costs and support future NIM resilience .
- Credit quality robust: NPLs at 6 bps of loans and ACL at 1.07% reflect conservative underwriting amid active CRE and diversified growth .
- Strategic growth vectors: Bay Area footprint (Walnut Creek Q3) and Food & Agribusiness vertical broaden revenue sources and potentially rebalance CRE concentration over time .
- Near-term modeling updates: Bake in Q3 incremental opex (+$0.5–$0.75M) and lower effective tax rate (~26.65%)—EPS sensitivity favorable despite higher opex .
- Liquidity and capital provide flexibility: ~$2.15B immediate liquidity and CET1 10.85% support growth and dividend continuity ($0.20 declared) .
- Watch for definitional nuances in “Revenue”: Use EPS/NIM/Net Interest Income as core performance indicators; reconcile S&P revenue with bank-reported line items when comparing to consensus [GetEstimates]*.