Sign in

Bradley Arnett

Executive Vice President, Chief Legal Officer and Corporate Secretary at GERMAN AMERICAN BANCORP
Executive

About Bradley Arnett

Bradley C. Arnett (age 60) is Executive Vice President, Chief Legal Officer and Corporate Secretary of German American Bancorp, Inc. (GABC). He was appointed SVP, Chief Legal Officer and Corporate Secretary effective September 25, 2023 and promoted to Executive Vice President on January 1, 2025; prior to GABC, he was a partner at Dentons focusing on SEC reporting/compliance, corporate governance, M&A, banking regulation, commercial finance, and securities offerings . Company performance context: FY2024 net income was $83.8M with diluted EPS $2.83 and ROE 12.2%; one-time actions included an insurance agency sale (+$0.93 EPS), securities portfolio restructuring (−$0.92 EPS), and Heartland merger costs (−$0.04 EPS) . Pay-versus-performance shows cumulative TSR value of a $100 initial investment at $128.97 in 2024 vs peer group $122.17 .

Past Roles

OrganizationRoleYearsStrategic Impact
Dentons (Law firm)PartnerLed practice in SEC reporting/compliance, governance, M&A, banking regulation; brings capital markets and regulatory expertise to GABC

External Roles

OrganizationRoleYearsStrategic Impact
No public-company directorships disclosed

Fixed Compensation

Component2024 ValueNotes
Base Salary$260,000 First year as NEO in 2024
Discretionary Bonus$86,444 $75,402 for promotion to EVP; $11,042 deferred sign-on bonus
Short-term Incentive Opportunity26.25% (Good), 43.75% (Very Good), 61.25% (Exceptional) of base salary Quarterly vesting of earned 2024 cash incentives during 2025, contingent on continued employment; clawback applies
Long-term Incentive Opportunity26.25% (Good), 43.75% (Very Good), 61.25% (Exceptional) of base salary Settled 100% in restricted stock; three-year vesting 1/3 annually; clawback applies

Performance Compensation

2024 Short-Term Incentive Scorecard (Corporate)

MetricWeightTarget Definition2024 Actual ResultPayout Mechanics
EPS Growth (adjusted)25% Adjusted to exclude M&A costs, insurance sale gain, securities restructuring loss Good (Threshold met) Weighted formula; overall STI between Good & Very Good
Efficiency Ratio (adjusted)10% Excludes noted non-core items Between Very Good & Exceptional Weighted formula
Core Organic Loan Growth20% Dec 2024 avg vs Dec 2023 avg Between Good & Very Good Weighted formula
Core Organic Deposits & Repos Growth15% Dec 2024 avg vs Dec 2023 avg Between Good & Very Good Weighted formula
NPA/Total Assets (avg of quarter-ends)10% Average of four quarter-end ratios Above Exceptional Weighted formula
Individual/Judgmental Component20% Role goals and job performanceAssessed by CEO (input from President) Weighted judgmental
STI TriggerNet income trigger $69.44MExceeded If not met, no payout

Arnett’s earned 2024 non-equity (cash) incentive paid in 2025: $103,831 .

2022–2024 Long-Term Incentive (LTI) Scorecard (3-year)

MetricWeightMethod2022–2024 Actual ResultPayout & Vesting
Adjusted ROE33 1/3% GABC percentile rank vs custom Midwest bank peer group; peers and GABC adjusted for M&A and other non-core items Between Very Good & Exceptional Restricted stock grant; vests 1/3 on 3/15/2026, 3/15/2027, 3/15/2028; clawback; accelerated on change in control
Adjusted ROA33 1/3% Percentile rank vs peers (adjusted) Between Good & Very Good Same as above
Adjusted EPS Growth33 1/3% Average growth vs Board-set goals; adjusted for non-core events Between Good & Very Good Same as above
LTI TriggerNet income trigger $69.44MExceeded

Arnett’s 2024 LTI (granted March 15, 2025) fair value: $100,400 (100% restricted stock; estimated good/very good/exceptional share counts 1,697/2,829/3,960 used for planning) . Vesting for 2024-earned LTI: 1/3 on 3/15/2026, 1/3 on 3/15/2027, 1/3 on 3/15/2028 .

Equity Ownership & Alignment

ItemDetail
Beneficial Ownership4,375 shares; <1% of outstanding
Unvested Restricted Stock Outstanding (12/31/2024)5,351 shares; market value $215,217
2024 Stock Vested616 shares vested; $27,997 realized value in 2024
Scheduled Vesting (Change-in-Control table snapshot at 12/31/2024)1,685 shares scheduled 12/5/2025 ($67,771); 1,069 shares scheduled 3/15/2026 ($42,995); total market value $110,766 at $40.22/share
OptionsNone outstanding; no option awards granted in years shown; repricing prohibited without shareholder approval
Anti-Hedging/PledgingHedging, pledging, short sales prohibited; 6-month minimum holding period on purchases; quarterly/special blackout periods for insiders
Ownership GuidelinesNEOs (other than CEO/President/CFO) must attain ≥1.5× base salary in common shares; Arnett has 5 years from date of 2025 proxy to comply; 1-year holding period on shares from equity awards (tax withholding exceptions)

Employment Terms

ProvisionStatus
Employment AgreementGABC does not have employment agreements with NEOs; compensation set annually (more flexibility)
SeveranceNo severance/change-in-control agreements; no cash multiples disclosed
Change-in-Control2019 LTI Plan provides acceleration of unvested restricted stock upon change in control (unless Board decides otherwise); at 12/31/2024, Arnett would vest $110,766 of unvested shares at $40.22/share
ClawbackIncentive Compensation Recovery Policy adopted 10/30/2023 (effective 10/2/2023) per SEC/Nasdaq rules; broader misconduct clawbacks also apply; Sarbanes-Oxley §304 reimbursement if applicable
Non-Compete/Non-Solicit/Garden LeaveNot disclosed in proxy; no contracts indicated

Compensation Structure Analysis

  • Base salaries targeted at 50th–60th percentile; incentive-heavy design with meaningful at-risk pay; opportunities remain competitive vs peer group; pay-for-performance alignment expected to strengthen as current NEOs gain tenure .
  • Short-term plan paid between Good & Very Good for 2024 (corporate results), with strong NPA ratio and efficiency; Arnett’s earned cash incentive $103,831; quarterly vesting through 2025 .
  • Long-term plan uses ROE/ROA percentile vs peers and EPS growth; 2022–2024 results between Good & Very Good overall; Arnett’s 2024 LTI grant $100,400 with three-year vesting and clawbacks .
  • Governance guardrails: anti-hedging/pledging; no option repricing/buybacks; clawbacks; insider blackout periods .

Compensation Peer Group and Say-on-Pay

  • Peer group of 20 Midwest regional banks (e.g., First Busey, Park National, Stock Yards Bancorp) used for benchmarking executive pay and performance; asset sizes ~$3.5B–$12.5B; GABC ~$6.2B YE2023; pro forma ~$8.3B as of 12/31/2024 including Heartland .
  • Say-on-pay support ~96% at 2024 annual meeting for FY2023 NEO compensation (annual vote) .

Performance & Track Record (Company Context)

Metric20232024
Net Income$85.9M; EPS $2.91 $83.8M; EPS $2.83; ROE 12.2%
Strategic ActionsSold insurance agency for $40.0M cash (+$27.476M after-tax gain); securities portfolio restructuring (after-tax −$27.189M); Heartland merger costs (after-tax −$1.082M); Heartland merger closed Feb 1, 2025
TSR (value of $100)2023: 100.86 (GABC), 102.59 (peer) 2024: 128.97 (GABC), 122.17 (peer)

Investment Implications

  • Alignment: Arnett’s compensation is driven by adjusted ROE/ROA/EPS and corporate operating metrics with net income triggers and robust clawbacks, plus anti-hedging/pledging—favorable for shareholder alignment and risk control .
  • Retention and selling pressure: Unvested restricted stock (5,351 shares at 12/31/2024) and scheduled vesting (1,685 sh on 12/5/2025; 1,069 sh on 3/15/2026) suggest ongoing retention incentive and limited near-term selling due to holding/blackout policies; change-in-control would accelerate vesting ($110,766 at $40.22/share snapshot) .
  • Governance quality: No employment/severance contracts, strong clawback/anti-hedging, ownership requirements (1.5× salary target over 5 years) point to prudent design; high say-on-pay support (~96%) indicates investor acceptance .
  • Execution risk: Company’s adjusted-based metric design mitigates distortions from one-time items (insurance sale, securities restructuring, M&A), but continued integration of Heartland and credit provisioning (e.g., Day 2 CECL) are performance sensitivities for incentive outcomes .