GREIF, INC (GEF)·Q4 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q4 2025 was a two‑month quarter (Aug–Sep) due to fiscal year-end change; net sales from continuing operations were $701.3M (−3.3% YoY) while Adjusted EBITDA rose 7.4% to $98.9M and EBITDA margin expanded ~140 bps YoY; GAAP diluted EPS (continuing ops) was −$0.73, with Adjusted EPS $0.01, driven by outsized tax expense and discontinuity effects from divestitures .
- Versus S&P Global consensus: revenue missed ($701.3M vs $714.4M), EPS missed (−$0.73 vs $0.60); Adjusted EBITDA was modestly below consensus ($98.9M vs $101.2M)*; management emphasized margin gains from price/cost and cost optimization offsetting industrial demand softness .
- FY 2026 low‑end guidance initiated: Adjusted EBITDA $630M and Adjusted FCF $315M; cost optimization commitment increased to $120M cumulative by FY 2027; pro forma leverage now below 1.0x, and an open‑market repurchase of ~$150M is planned as a near‑term capital allocation catalyst .
- Portfolio reshaping completed: containerboard divestiture (Q4) and timberlands sale (Oct 1) bolstered balance sheet and lowered capital intensity; Q4 included large discontinued ops gains and unusual tax effects which distorted GAAP EPS optics .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
What Went Well
- Adjusted EBITDA up 7.4% YoY to $98.9M, with EBITDA margin expansion (~14.1% vs ~12.7% YoY) from price/cost improvements and cost actions: “EBITDA margins also expanded year-over-year by 140 basis points” .
- Cost optimization ahead of plan: $50M run‑rate achieved in FY25; cumulative target raised to $120M by FY27; SG&A rationalization and ground‑up ideas accelerating savings: “raising… cumulative run rate commitment… to $120 million” .
- Strategic focus areas performing: small polymer containers momentum (agrochemicals), closures winning new business at 30%+ gross margin, and fiber segment gross profit up on better price/cost, despite volume softness .
Quotes:
- CEO: “We closed fiscal ’25 as a more focused… company… Our transformation is accelerating and the results are beginning to show.” .
- CFO: “Adjusted EBITDA for the quarter was $99 million, which was 7.4% above the prior year.” .
- CEO on savings: “cost optimization… now being fueled from the ground up… we are raising… to $120 million.” .
What Went Wrong
- GAAP EPS (continuing ops) fell to −$0.73 on heavy tax expense against a short two‑month pre‑tax loss base and residual discontinued ops impacts; Adjusted EPS dropped to $0.01: “tax expense of $26.8M on a $9.6M net loss before tax” .
- Industrial demand softness weighed on volumes: Metals −6.6% volume, Fiber −7.7%; IBCs declined mid‑single digits; management sees no compelling demand inflection yet .
- Integrated Solutions net sales and EBITDA fell YoY on lower selling prices and mix; operating loss of $(2.7)M in Q4 vs $4.1M prior year two‑month period .
Analyst concerns: chemicals/end‑market weakness, sequencing of FY26 EBITDA (Q1 ≈20% of year), and reliance on cost to offset incremental volume downside; management pointed to levers across shifts/furloughs and continued cost momentum .
Financial Results
Note: Q4 2025 reflects a two‑month quarter (Aug–Sep). Q2 and Q3 are three‑month quarters.
Versus prior year (two‑month comps, Aug–Sep):
Consensus vs actual (Q4 2025; S&P Global):
Values marked with * retrieved from S&P Global.
Segment breakdown (two‑month Q4; Aug–Sep):
KPIs and balance sheet:
Guidance Changes
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- “Our planned share repurchases in 2026 reflect our conviction in the significant earnings power and operating leverage we are creating… and robust free cash flow generation including fiscal 2026 guidance which includes a conversion ratio of 50%.” — Ole Rosgaard, CEO .
- “Adjusted free cash flow also improved year‑over‑year… SG&A includes $28 million of operating costs related to the containerboard divestment… Adjusted EPS for the quarter was $0.01… Q4 tax expense was impacted by nonrecurring items… and jurisdiction mix.” — Larry Hilsheimer, CFO .
- “Volumes were flat year‑over‑year [in Polymers]… small containers continued positive volume momentum driven by agrochemicals… mid‑single digit declines in IBC and large polymer drums…” — Ole Rosgaard, CEO .
- “With our pro forma leverage below 1.0x… we plan to execute as quickly as possible on ~ $150 million open market repurchases… and seek new authorization enabling regular repurchases up to 2% per year.” — Larry Hilsheimer, CFO .
Q&A Highlights
- Sequencing of FY26 EBITDA: Q1 ≈20% of year; balance ~25–30% each quarter; low‑end guidance assumes flat to slight volume declines in metals/fiber and low single‑digit volume improvement in polymers/closures .
- Cost levers vs potential volume downside: ability to pull back shifts/furloughs; upside from cost optimization likely in FY26 beyond low‑end bridge .
- Closures pricing/procurement: ~$12M benefit from procurement in polymers/closures; focus on growing closures as an independent segment (“Innovative Closure Solutions”) with high margins and organic/M&A growth .
- Metals regional dynamics: NA softness; EMEA steel performance surprisingly stronger on a 2‑year stack; manage metals for cash, flexible shifts .
- IonKraft tech: proprietary barrier technology ramping through FY26–27; UN approval on first container; supports growth and sustainability positioning .
- URB pricing/margins: incremental URB pricing benefits in FY26 bridge; goal for fiber margins to normalize higher; backlogs strongest in 2+ years .
Estimates Context
- Revenue: Actual $701.3M vs consensus $714.4M for Q4 2025 — miss*.
- Primary EPS: Actual GAAP (continuing ops) −$0.73 vs consensus $0.60 — miss*. Adjusted EPS was $0.01, reflecting tax distortions in a short quarter .
- EBITDA: Consensus $101.2M vs company Adjusted EBITDA $98.9M — slight miss*.
- FY estimates: FY 2025 consensus EBITDA ~$626.7M vs company Adjusted EBITDA $511.3M (11‑month) due to divestiture and quarter length effects; FY 2026 consensus EBITDA ~$640.6M aligns broadly with low‑end company guide trajectory*.
Values marked with * retrieved from S&P Global. Based on these outcomes, consensus models likely need to lower near‑term EPS for GAAP optics (tax and discontinued ops accounting), maintain/improve margin assumptions from price/cost and cost saves, and reflect portfolio changes.
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Margin resilience despite industrial contraction: EBITDA margin expanded YoY; cost optimization and price/cost tailwinds are offsetting volume softness .
- Expect cleaner optics in FY26: two‑month Q4 and unusual tax items depressed GAAP EPS; low‑end FY26 guide embeds conservative volumes and identifiable cost actions .
- Capital returns likely near term: leverage <1.0x and a ~$150M buyback plan; management pursuing regular repurchases (~2%/yr) subject to Board approvals .
- Segment tilt to resilience: polymers (small containers, agrochemicals) and closures are strategic growth focuses with attractive margins; metals managed for cash; fiber benefits from URB pricing and cost discipline .
- Watch URB pricing and OCC: incremental URB pricing recognized and lower OCC costs should further support fiber margins in FY26 .
- Technology and product innovation: IonKraft barrier tech ramp provides differentiated, sustainable packaging solutions; potential medium‑term growth driver .
- Estimate revisions: expect EPS consensus cuts on GAAP optics for Q4; EBITDA/FCF likely to converge with company’s FY26 low‑end given clear bridge components*.
Values marked with * retrieved from S&P Global.