ET
ESS Tech, Inc. (GWH)·Q2 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- ESS Tech reported GAAP revenue of $2.36M, up 294% q/q, with GAAP operating expenses down 35% and adjusted EBITDA loss improving to $(7.77)M; net loss per share was $(0.90) .
- Relative to S&P Global consensus, revenue slightly missed ($2.36M vs $2.40M*) and EPS slightly missed (−$0.90 vs −$0.88*); consensus coverage remains very thin (one estimate) *.
- Liquidity actions: secured up to $31M financing (including a $25M SEPA), raised >$2M in first six weeks, ended July with $7.2M cash, and reduced operating cash burn ~80% in June vs Q1 average .
- Commercial pivot gaining traction: first Energy Base sale (8 MWh), proposals totaling >1.1 GWh in Q2, pipeline focused 100% on Energy Base/core component sales .
- Leadership upgrades: appointed Jigish Trivedi as COO and Kate Suhadolnik as interim CFO to drive operational execution amid the Energy Base transition .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
What Went Well
- Cost discipline: GAAP operating expenses fell 35% q/q to $6.46M; adjusted EBITDA loss improved to $(7.77)M (vs $(18.80)M in Q2’24) .
- Commercial momentum: first Energy Base sale (8 MWh) closed; proposal activity exceeded 1.1 GWh in Q2; pipeline now fully concentrated on Energy Base/core components .
- Liquidity actions executed: up to $31M financing secured, >$2M raised under SEPA in first six weeks, and $7.2M cash at end of July; operating cash burn down ~80% in June .
Quote: “Q2 reflects the early results of the operational reset we began earlier this year… we continue to see growing demand from Tier 1 customers” — Kelly Goodman, Interim CEO .
What Went Wrong
- Gross margin deeply negative: Q2 gross loss $(5.10)M on $2.36M revenue; cost of revenue still exceeded revenue by ~3.2x .
- No formal revenue guidance for H2 2025; visibility depends on converting proposals to backlog in H2 .
- Cash position at quarter-end was low ($0.80M), requiring continued reliance on external financing and cash management actions .
Financial Results
Comparison vs S&P Global Consensus (Q2 2025):
Values retrieved from S&P Global*.
Segment breakdown: ESS does not report discrete segments; results reflect company-level performance .
Guidance Changes
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- Strategic focus: “We are building a business with sharper focus, disciplined execution, and a stronger financial foundation.” — Kelly Goodman .
- Pipeline and conversion: “We have already converted one [proposal] to a win… expect to be converting some additional proposals to backlog in the back half of this year” — Kelly Goodman .
- Liquidity and runway: “We have already been able to raise over $2,000,000 in capital… ended July with cash and cash equivalents of $7,200,000” — Kate Suhadolnik .
- Cost philosophy: “We intend to continue the disciplined approach… to right size the business and the business cost” — Kelly Goodman .
- US manufacturing advantage: “Over 98% of the components… are sourced domestically… exposure to these changing policies continues to be minimal” — Kate Suhadolnik .
Q&A Highlights
- Proposal conversion timing: One proposal converted; expect additional conversions in H2 2025; pace of proposal to contracting improving since February launch of Energy Base .
- Revenue trajectory: No H2 revenue guidance; visibility expected to improve as contracts close .
- SEPA/financing utilization: >$2M raised under SEPA in first six weeks; focus on maximizing proceeds subject to stock performance .
- Cash burn outlook: Target ongoing reductions via right-sizing, vendor terms, and disciplined execution; philosophical shift to align costs with business capacity .
Estimates Context
- Q2 2025 vs S&P Global consensus: revenue $2.36M vs $2.40M*, EPS $(0.90) vs $(0.88), adjusted EBITDA $(7.77)M vs $(7.60)M; small misses across metrics amid thin coverage (1 estimate for Q2 revenue and EPS) *.
- Forward estimates indicate modest sequential revenue improvement into Q4 and FY 2026, but coverage is sparse; revisions likely hinge on H2 backlog conversions and capital availability*.
Values retrieved from S&P Global*.
KPIs
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Execution on the Energy Base pivot is progressing: first sale booked; pipeline concentrated on longer-duration solutions; watch for H2 backlog additions as near-term catalysts .
- Cost actions are having impact: OpEx −35% q/q and adjusted EBITDA improvement; sustaining burn-rate reductions is vital given low Q2 quarter-end cash .
- Liquidity runway improved via $31M financing and SEPA utilization; ongoing capital access will influence delivery scaling and the timing of backlog-to-revenue conversion .
- Policy tailwinds (OBBB, 45X) and US sourcing (>98% domestic) mitigate tariff risk and support customer economics — a competitive advantage for ESS in LDES .
- Near-term: stock reaction likely driven by contract wins, SEPA draw pace, and cash burn trajectory; medium-term thesis depends on executing the Energy Base cost/performance roadmap and scaling manufacturing/deliveries .
- Estimates misses were marginal with minimal coverage; expect consensus to recalibrate as H2 contract conversions crystallize and revenue visibility improves*.
Values retrieved from S&P Global*.
Citations:
- Q2 2025 8-K press release and exhibits .
- Q2 2025 earnings call transcript .
- Funding press release and 8-K SEPA details .
- Q1 2025 8-K press release .
- Q4 2024 8-K press release .