HD Q1 2026: $10-15B Deferred Demand Opportunity Boosts Growth Outlook
- SRS Acquisition Integration & Growth Catalyst: SRS delivered $2.6 billion in sales and is expected to post mid-single-digit growth. Its trade credit program is expanding the Pro ecosystem, which could boost Home Depot’s share within the Pro segment.
- Deferred Demand Opportunity: Management highlighted approximately $50 billion of deferred home improvement demand. With a roughly 25% market share, this translates to a potential $10-15 billion opportunity as macro conditions improve, especially when larger remodeling projects eventually gain traction.
- Resilient Supply Chain & Pricing Strategy: Home Depot’s diversified sourcing—with over 50% of purchases from the U.S. and plans to limit any single non-U.S. source to below 10% within 12 months—helps mitigate tariff pressures and supports stable pricing, preserving competitive margins.
- Tariff and Cost Pressures: The discussion highlighted that with a blended tariff of around 20% on imported goods—with Home Depot absorbing roughly half—the retailer may face significant cost pressures while keeping pricing constant, potentially compressing margins.
- Margin Headwinds from SRS Integration: The integration of SRS into the comp base is creating margin headwinds, with an annualized impact expected to be around 40 basis points despite only a 15 basis point impact year-over-year, indicating potential pressure on operating margins.
- Weakness in Large, Finance-Driven Remodeling Projects: Executives noted that despite strong DIY and small-project activity, the anticipated surge in larger remodeling projects has not materialized due to high interest rates and ongoing macro uncertainty affecting customer financing for big-ticket projects.
| Metric | YoY Change | Reason |
|---|---|---|
Net Sales | +9% (from $36.418B to $39.856B) | Q1 2026 net sales increased by roughly 9% driven by strong contributions from the Primary segment—including building materials and hardlines—as well as geographic growth in the U.S. and notable contributions from the SRS acquisition (adding $2.569B), building on momentum from Q1 2025. |
Gross Profit | +8% (from $12.433B to $13.459B) | Gross profit grew by about 8% as a result of increased net sales, although the gross margin slightly declined (from 34.1% to 33.8%) largely due to SRS’s lower margin profile impacting overall profitability relative to Q1 2025. |
Operating Income | +1% (from $5.079B to $5.133B) | Operating income increased modestly by 1% reflecting improved operational efficiency in core segments that somewhat offset rising costs and margin pressures introduced by recent acquisitions, consistent with trends observed in Q1 2025. |
Net Earnings | -4.6% (from $3.600B to $3.433B; EPS from $3.64 to $3.46) | Net earnings declined by approximately 4.6% amid pressures such as a higher cost base and potential increases in financing and other expenses, which impacted profitability despite robust top-line growth compared to Q1 2025. |
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities | Steady at $4.325B | The operating cash flow remained robust at $4.325B due to strong operational cash generation and disciplined working capital management, continuing a trend seen in previous periods. |
Capital Expenditures | Decrease (from $847M to $806M) | Capital expenditures were contained at $806M in Q1 2026, a slight decline from $847M in Q1 2025, indicating a disciplined and cautious approach to capital investment following prior period increases and supporting strategic, efficient allocation of resources. |
| Metric | Period | Previous Guidance | Current Guidance | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Sales Growth | FY 2025 | 2.8% | 2.8% | no change |
Comparable Sales Growth | FY 2025 | 1% | 1% | no change |
Gross Margin | FY 2025 | 33.4% | 33.4% | no change |
Operating Margin | FY 2025 | 13% | 13% | no change |
Adjusted Operating Margin | FY 2025 | 13.4% | 13.4% | no change |
Effective Tax Rate | FY 2025 | 24.5% | 24.5% | no change |
Net Interest Expense | FY 2025 | $2.2 billion | $2.2 billion | no change |
Capital Expenditures | FY 2025 | 2.5% of sales | 2.5% of sales | no change |
Diluted Earnings Per Share | FY 2025 | no prior guidance | -3% | no prior guidance |
Adjusted Diluted EPS | FY 2025 | -2% | -2% | no change |
| Metric | Period | Guidance | Actual | Performance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Sales Growth | Q1 2026 vs Q1 2025 | ~2.8% growth for FY 2025 | 9.4% YOY (39,856Vs 36,418) | Beat |
Gross Margin | Q1 2026 | ~33.4% for FY 2025 | 33.8% (=(39,856−26,397)/39,856) | Beat |
Operating Margin | Q1 2026 | ~13% for FY 2025 | 12.9% (=5,133/39,856) | Met |
Diluted EPS (YOY change) | Q1 2026 vs Q1 2025 | ~-2% vs. FY 2024 (adjusted) | -5% YOY (3.45Vs 3.63) (GAAP basis) | Missed |
| Topic | Previous Mentions | Current Period | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|
SRS Acquisition Integration | Previously discussed across Q4 2025 , Q3 2025 , and Q2 2025 with an overall positive tone – executives emphasized hitting targets, improved cross-selling opportunities, and a process for rapid integration that boosts comp growth despite mix and margin headwinds. | In Q1 2026, executives noted that SRS is exceeding expectations in performance and growth; it is gaining market share across roofing, pool, and landscape; its integration is supporting the trade credit program; and while it exerts a margin headwind, its contributions to sales and the Pro ecosystem are robust. | Consistent positive sentiment with maturation of the integration; while mix challenges persist, the near‐term performance and broader strategic benefits (e.g., trade credit, organic growth) are being emphasized. |
Pro Customer Ecosystem Expansion | Discussed in Q4 2025 , Q3 2025 and Q2 2025 with detailed coverage of incremental sales, expanded capabilities (including trade credit, enhanced order/account management), and investments driving strong Pro customer engagement. | In Q1 2026, the emphasis remains on expanding the Pro ecosystem. The discussion highlighted robust trade credit program management (via SRS), enhanced performance in Pro-heavy categories, and accelerated comps among Pro customers. | Bullish and steady focus. The positive narrative is maintained with additional details on improved Pro sales and integration, indicating sustained momentum and potential for further organic growth. |
Deferred Home Improvement Demand | Addressed in Q4 2025 , Q3 2025 and Q2 2025 – executives noted deferrals in larger remodeling projects due to high financing costs and macro uncertainty, with cautious tone about future recovery despite underlying fundamentals. | In Q1 2026, the discussion became more forward looking with a quantified mention of a $50 billion shortfall in spending and the potential for a $10–$15 billion share opportunity for Home Depot as rates decline and consumer confidence improves. | A shift toward optimism on this topic. While earlier periods focused on the deferral and caution, Q1 2026 introduces a more positive expectation on eventual recovery, though large projects remain subdued in the short term. |
Supply Chain Resilience and Tariff/Cost Pressures | In Q4 2025 and Q3 2025 a strong emphasis was placed on diversified sourcing and supplier partnerships to offset tariff pressures. Q2 2025 did not cover these topics. | Q1 2026 provided detailed commentary on diversified sourcing (with >50% U.S. sourcing) and inventory strength, along with a clear strategy to absorb about half of tariff costs without passing them on to customers. | Steady and proactive. The theme remains consistently highlighted with enhanced detail in Q1 2026, reinforcing resilience and active management of cost pressures. |
Margin and Profitability Pressures | Detailed in Q4 2025 , Q3 2025 and Q2 2025 with emphasis on mix impacts from SRS, higher interest expenses, and cost management efforts to offset pressures while maintaining guidance. | In Q1 2026, continued margin pressures were noted with a decline in both gross and operating margins due to SRS mix effects and higher costs; however, improvements in shrink and operational initiatives provide partial mitigation. | Persistent pressure with cautious management. The ongoing challenge of balancing integration impacts with operational improvements is evident; the sentiment remains cautious though some mitigating levers are noted. |
Weakness in Large Remodeling/Big-ticket Transactions | Across Q4 2025 , Q3 2025 and Q2 2025 there was consistent coverage of softness in large discretionary projects due to high interest rates and elevated financing costs, with repeated negative comps for big-ticket transactions. | In Q1 2026, similar concerns were raised – while big-ticket comp transactions showed marginal positive movement (e.g. +0.3%), the underlying weakness in large remodeling projects remains due to high interest rates and consumer preference for smaller projects. | Continued weakness. There is no significant recovery in large-ticket areas, though a minor positive shift is indicated; overall, the sentiment remains a concern tied to macro-financing challenges. |
Macroeconomic Headwinds and Financing Challenges | Covered in Q4 2025 , Q3 2025 and Q2 2025 highlighting broad economic uncertainties, elevated interest rates, lower housing turnover, and political risks that pressure consumer financing for large projects. | In Q1 2026, this topic continues to be a key headwind – higher interest rates affecting larger remodeling projects and financing remain significant challenges, although Home Depot shows confidence in its operational teams and Pro initiatives as counterbalances. | Consistent concern. The challenges are persistent across the periods with repeated emphasis on the negative impact of high rates; however, there is an underlying confidence in management’s ability to navigate these headwinds over time. |
New Store Investment and Capital Expenditure Concerns | Discussed in Q4 2025 , Q3 2025 and Q2 2025 with clear targets for new store openings and increased capital expenditure percentages (from 2% to 2.5% in fiscal guidance), demonstrating an ongoing strategic expansion. | In Q1 2026, Home Depot reported the opening of 3 new stores and capital expenditures of about $800 million in the quarter, with continued commitment to invest roughly 2.5% of sales in capital projects. | Stable and strategic. The initiative to expand the footprint and upgrade capabilities remains consistent, reflecting a bullish long‐term investment strategy despite short-term macro pressures. |
Operational Efficiency Challenges (Shrink and Weather Disruptions) | Q4 2025 , Q3 2025 and Q2 2025 - consistent discussions on shrink reduction efforts yielding positive margin tailwinds and weather disruptions (from hurricanes or extreme conditions) causing temporary sales variability. | In Q1 2026, shrink improvements continue with six consecutive quarters of better performance, providing a 30–40 basis point tailwind. Weather disruptions were noted in February, followed by a rebound in subsequent months, showing effective operational management. | Gradually improving. Shrink reduction is clearly a positive trend and weather-related impacts are managed with rebounds noted; despite external volatility, operational improvements signal steady progress. |
Diversified Business Model and HD Supply Performance | Q2 2025 included commentary on the diversified business model and highlighted HD Supply’s strong performance and positive sales growth, although later periods (Q3/Q4) had little mention. | In Q1 2026, the focus remains on the diversified sourcing strategy—over 50% U.S. sourcing with controlled exposure to foreign countries—and HD Supply is mentioned as part of total comp reporting but not detailed separately. | Consistent but lower profile. The diversified business model continues to underpin the company’s strategy, and HD Supply remains a steady performer; the emphasis is more strategic in nature rather than a major headline topic in Q1 2026. |
-
Deferred Demand
Q: How will deferred demand boost sales?
A: Management expects that unlocking $50B of deferred home improvement spend—translating to approximately $10B–$15B opportunity given a 25% market share—will drive future growth as market conditions improve. -
Demand Outlook
Q: How’s the overall consumer demand environment?
A: Leaders stressed that recession fears have largely subsided, with improving sentiment, robust home equity, and healthy job and wage growth supporting steady demand despite weather challenges. -
Tariff Impact
Q: Do tariffs force price increases?
A: They explained that their diversified sourcing—now over 50% domestic—helps limit exposure to tariffs, allowing them to keep prices steady while leveraging productivity improvements to offset cost pressures. -
Comp Guidance
Q: Is Q2 comp guidance on track?
A: Management reaffirmed fiscal guidance, noting FX headwinds and early quarter challenges but expecting modest comp sales growth and a return to momentum in the coming period. -
SG&A Expenses
Q: What drove higher SG&A expenses?
A: The increase was driven by a one-time legal settlement last year, the addition of SRS expenses this year, and a shift from a 53‑week to a 52‑week year, resulting in a levered expense effect consistent with expectations. -
SRS Integration
Q: When will SRS fully impact comps?
A: SRS, which joined mid‑Q2, has already exceeded expectations, and while it enters total company comp (and not U.S. comp), its ongoing growth is expected to progressively enhance overall performance. -
Shrink & Margin
Q: How sustainable are shrink benefits and margin effects?
A: Management noted that shrink metrics have improved consistently over the last 6 quarters, and although SRS adds a small headwind now, its long‑term margin contribution is expected to be positive. -
Inventory Positioning
Q: What explains the 15% inventory increase?
A: The higher inventory largely reflects the integration of SRS’s stock rather than any intentional pull‐forward, leaving the overall positioning sound for the upcoming seasons. -
Comp Timing
Q: Did Easter affect comp sales timing?
A: They acknowledged an Easter timing shift that boosted March comps at the expense of April, with expectations that normalized comp performance will resume moving forward. -
Regional Performance
Q: How did weather impact regional sales?
A: Management observed that adverse weather in northern areas and Canada tempered performance, while hurricane recovery benefits contributed as expected in certain regions, aligning overall with annual guidance. -
Competitive Pricing
Q: How is pricing positioned versus competitors?
A: They remain confident in their price discipline, noting that robust SKU‑level insights and diversified supply strategies have allowed them to keep pricing steady without broad‑based increases, maintaining a competitive edge.
Research analysts covering HOME DEPOT.