Q3 2024 Summary
Published Jan 14, 2025, 4:27 PM UTC- $HG has $140 million remaining in its share buyback authorization, providing potential for increased shareholder value through continued repurchases.
- The company has flexibility to utilize the buyback as needed, indicating a strong capital position and effective capital management without needing to upstream capital from operating companies.
- Hamilton Insurance Group is facing increased competition in key markets such as cyber, financial lines (D&O), and large global property placements, which is putting pressure on pricing and could impact premium growth and profitability.
- The company experienced unfavorable casualty reserve development due to one large loss in the International segment, indicating potential exposure to large claims and possible underwriting issues.
- The International segment's current year attritional loss ratio increased to 55.3% in the third quarter, up from 54.6% in the prior quarter, driven by business mix and more conservative assumptions regarding social inflation, which may pressure profitability.
| Topic | Previous Mentions | Current Period | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|
Share Buyback Authorization | Q2: Announced a $150 million repurchase authorization with discussions on timing and funding sources (dependent on market price, excess capital, and dividends) | Q3: Executed $10 million in repurchases at a 17% discount, leaving $140 million available under the authorization | Shift from planning to execution, with detailed focus on securing discounted repurchases. |
Capital Management | Q2: Emphasized maintaining a strong balance sheet, low leverage, and flexible funding (using dividends and liquid assets) | Q3: Continued to stress flexibility in using available funds, with repurchase activity occurring amid wind season considerations | Consistent emphasis on balanced and flexible capital utilization. |
International Segment Performance | Q2: Reported robust double-digit growth in premiums and underwriting profitability with significant increases in premium volumes | Q3: Delivered solid underwriting income and premium growth, though with a slight uptick in the attritional loss ratio and adjustments due to business mix changes | Maintained growth focus but faces emerging challenges in loss metrics and business mix. |
Underwriting Performance | Q2: Achieved record underwriting results with an all-time low combined ratio and strong segment results (e.g., Bermuda at 77.4%) | Q3: Reported underwriting income of $29 million with a group combined ratio of 93.6%, impacted by significant catastrophe losses | Shift from exceptional outcomes to more challenging performance affected by catastrophe events. |
Casualty Reserve Development | Q2: Noted no significant casualty reserve adjustments and a cautious, well-managed reserve setting process | Q3: Faced unfavorable reserve developments driven by a large loss and revised social inflation assumptions, with notable reserve increases in International and Bermuda segments | Emergence of pronounced reserve challenges compared to prior stability. |
Competitive Pressures | Q2: Addressed indirectly, with cautious participation in cyber and professional lines and selective underwriting | Q3: Explicitly highlighted increased competition in the cyber market (London), pricing pressure in D&O, and competitive challenges in global property placements | Heightened focus on competitive market dynamics with specific pressures now clearly identified. |
Wind Season Capital Constraints | Q2: Discussed as a key factor in timing share repurchases and bonus approvals, ensuring sufficient capital during wind season | Q3: Not explicitly detailed beyond mention in repurchase activity, with less discussion on wind season capital needs | De-emphasized in Q3 compared to the detailed strategic planning in Q2. |
Bonus Expense Risks | Q2: Explicitly addressed with plans for 100% bonus targets and timing tied to wind season outcomes to manage capital risks | Q3: No explicit discussion or mention of bonus expense risks in the call | Bonus expense risks have been dropped from the current commentary. |
Social Inflation Impact | Q2: Incorporated as part of the actuarial and pricing approach, with social inflation factored into loss ratio assumptions | Q3: More explicitly acknowledged as driving increases in attritional loss ratios (with quantifiable reserve impacts in International and Bermuda segments) | Increased focus on and detailed discussion of social inflation effects across segments. |
Catastrophe Loss Performance | Q2: Emphasized a reduced focus on catastrophe losses with no reported losses due to strategic exits and higher attachment points | Q3: Reported significant net catastrophe losses ($38 million) while maintaining overall underwriting resilience; however, there was no renewed emphasis on reducing focus on catastrophes | A marked shift from minimizing catastrophe exposure in Q2 to confronting substantial losses in Q3 with management continuing to maintain resilience. |
-
Premium Growth Outlook
Q: Is growth in international segment meeting expectations despite competition?
A: The company acknowledges that gross premium written for the International segment is up 15% year-to-date [3]. However, growth was lower in the quarter due to underwriting discipline, particularly pulling back in cyber where they are seeing pressure on premiums [3]. They remain committed to not sacrificing bottom line for top line and are not changing their guidance [3]. -
Competitive Pressures
Q: Which areas are facing increased competition in the London market?
A: The company is seeing increased competition in the London market in cyber, D&O, and large global property placements [4]. While there is pressure on pricing, especially in these areas, they note that property insurance has seen quarterly rate increases since 2017, and they continue to target the most profitable business [4]. -
Ceding Commission Outlook
Q: Can reinsurers push down ceding commissions in the coming year?
A: The company expects that concerns around economic and social inflation will keep insurance pricing attractive and that this will put pressure on ceding commissions in certain deals [5]. Market discipline remains strong, and they anticipate pricing on the casualty side to uptick and ceding commissions to be pressured [5]. -
Casualty Reinsurance Expansion
Q: Is the company increasing its presence in U.S. casualty reinsurance?
A: They are playing offense in casualty reinsurance, taking advantage of opportunities as larger players pull back due to adverse developments or overexposure [6]. Their recent A rating upgrade has turbocharged their ability to selectively write targeted deals [6]. -
Rating Upgrade Impact
Q: Did the rating upgrade affect retention and growth?
A: The AM Best rating upgrade has positively impacted their reinsurance operations, leading to new business opportunities and the ability to increase line sizes [1]. They expect a 15% to 20% premium uplift on a run-rate basis starting in 2024 [1]. -
Expense Ratio Improvements
Q: Can the expense ratio continue to decline?
A: The company notes the expense ratio has decreased every year since 2019 [7]. As they continue to scale, they expect to further reduce the expense ratio each year, and that remains their target [7]. -
Capital Allocation
Q: Do you have flexibility for share buybacks?
A: They have flexibility to utilize the full buyback authorization, with capital at the holding company and the ability to upstream dividends from operating companies [8]. They have a $150 million authorization, used $10 million this quarter, and have $140 million remaining [8]. -
Casualty Reserve Development
Q: What drove the unfavorable casualty reserve development?
A: The group had favorable prior period development of about $3 million net for the quarter [0]. The favorable part was in property and specialty classes, offset by an unfavorable large loss on the casualty side in the International segment [0]. This loss occurred in Q4 2023, and new claims information received this quarter led to the adjustment [0]. -
Loss Ratio Trends
Q: Is the elevated international loss ratio a new run rate?
A: Full-year results provide a better gauge [2]. For 2023, the international attritional loss ratio was around 53% [2]. The current year-to-date attritional loss ratio is 54.6%, including 1.9 points from the Baltimore bridge loss in the first quarter [2]. The underlying loss ratio remains consistent when adjusted for these factors [2].