HI
HUNTINGTON INGALLS INDUSTRIES, INC. (HII)·Q3 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Strong quarter: revenue $3.19B (+16.1% YoY), EPS $3.68, operating margin 5.0%; shipbuilding revenue/margin materially improved with Newport News segment margin rising 389 bps YoY to 4.9% .
- Clear beat vs consensus: revenue beat by ~$0.24B and EPS beat by ~$0.32; EBITDA also above Street; free cash flow guidance raised to $550–$650M for FY25; cumulative FY25–26 FCF set at $1.2B . Estimates marked * are from S&P Global.
- Operational momentum: 1.25x book-to-bill at Mission Technologies; backlog $55.7B at quarter-end (call referenced $56B and $33B funded) .
- Catalysts ahead: timing of Block 6 Virginia-class and Columbia-class awards could swing Q4 margins toward/away from midpoint; dividend increased to $1.38 per share .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
What Went Well
- Record sales with broad-based growth: “we reported record third quarter sales of $3.2 billion… demand for our products and services remains strong” (CEO) .
- Shipbuilding throughput initiatives gaining traction (wages, outsourcing, Charleston Operations) delivering above-plan shipbuilding revenue in Q3 (material receipts, outsourcing lift) (CFO) .
- Mission Technologies momentum: 1.25x book-to-bill; unveiled AI-enabled ROMULUS USV and reached 750th REMUS UUV production; announced Shield AI partnership .
What Went Wrong
- Free cash flow seasonality and working capital: Q3 free cash flow $16M vs $136M in Q3’24; cash from ops $118M vs $213M YoY as disbursements shifted and collections timing impacted quarter .
- Mission Technologies margin compression: segment margin 4.3% (-33 bps YoY) on contract mix despite higher volumes; EBITDA margin down to 7.8% from 8.9% YoY .
- Tax rate headwind: Q3 effective tax rate 28.9% due to reduced R&D credit for prior year; FY25 ETR guidance raised to ~22% (from ~21%) .
Financial Results
Consolidated Performance (chronological: oldest → newest)
Segment Breakdown (Q3 2024 vs Q3 2025)
Additional non-GAAP: Shipbuilding revenue $2,076 → $2,445; shipbuilding operating income $64 → $145; shipbuilding margin 3.1% → 5.9% (Q3 2024 → Q3 2025) .
Actual vs Wall Street Consensus (S&P Global) – Q1 to Q3 2025
Values retrieved from S&P Global.
KPIs and Cash Metrics (chronological: Q1 → Q2 → Q3 2025)
Guidance Changes
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- “We reported record third quarter sales of $3.2 billion and diluted earnings per share of $3.68… Demand for our products and services remains strong.” — Chris Kastner, CEO .
- “Shipbuilding revenue was well ahead of our guidance for the quarter… supported by wages, higher material receipts, and increased outsourcing.” — Tom Stiehle, CFO .
- “If the submarine award were to push into 2026, it would be a headwind to our guidance… likely ending slightly below the midpoint; an award this year would support ending at or slightly above.” — Tom Stiehle .
- “4% midterm growth is probably in the rearview mirror… it’s probably in excess of that.” — Chris Kastner (regarding shipbuilding midterm growth) .
Q&A Highlights
- Award timing and margin sensitivity: Management reiterated margin range, noting performance incentives tied to submarine awards could affect Q4 positioning around the midpoint .
- Throughput improvement distribution: ~15% improvement target for FY25 is roughly equal across Ingalls and Newport News; wage increases aiding retention and experience mix at Newport News .
- EACs detail: Net EAC in Q3 was -$3M (gross favorable $37M, unfavorable $40M), with Ingalls +$6M, Newport News -$13M, Mission Tech +$4M .
- Autonomy strategy: Open-architecture Odyssey enables rapid integration with partners (Shield AI, C3 AI); first maritime deployment of Hivemind on ROMULUS 20 validates approach .
- Tax and cash outlook: Q3 ETR elevated (28.9%) from R&D credit reduction; FY25 ETR guided to ~22%. Two-year FCF run-rate guided ~$600M/year across 2025–2026, subject to timing of awards/receipts .
Estimates Context
- Q3 2025 beat: Revenue $3.192B vs $2.948B*; EPS $3.68 vs $3.36*; EBITDA $277M vs $226M* — broad-based beat across metrics. Values retrieved from S&P Global.
- Q2 2025 beat: Revenue $3.082B vs $2.934B*; EPS $3.86 vs $3.30*; EBITDA $285M vs $230M*. Values retrieved from S&P Global.
- Q1 2025 mixed: Revenue $2.734B vs $2.786B* (miss); EPS $3.79 vs $2.88* (beat); EBITDA $275M vs $210M*. Values retrieved from S&P Global.
- FY25 Street context: EPS ~$15.17*; revenue ~$12.08B* vs company outlook implying shipbuilding $9.0–$9.1B and Mission Tech $3.0–$3.1B plus eliminations .
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Near-term: Strong revenue/EPS beat and raised FCF guidance should support positive sentiment; watch submarine award timing into year-end as a key swing factor for Q4 margins .
- Shipbuilding inflection: Material improvement in shipbuilding margin (5.9%) and Newport News margin recovery signal progress on post-COVID contracts and throughput execution .
- Mission Technologies: Solid growth and pipeline (1.25x B2B), but margin mix pressure persists; continued autonomy rollouts (ROMULUS, Shield AI) offer strategic upside .
- Cash and capital returns: Cash balance $312M, ~$2B liquidity; dividend raised to $1.38; FCF trajectory ~$600M/year through 2026 underpins buyback potential post-operations stabilization .
- Macro/budget: Lapse in appropriations currently immaterial to shipbuilding, but Mission Tech more exposed; monitor FY26 appropriations process .
- Estimate revisions: Expect upward revisions to revenue/EPS/EBITDA for Q4/FY on evidence of throughput and outsourcing gains, tempered by ETR uplift and Mission Tech margin mix. Values retrieved from S&P Global.
- Medium-term thesis: Management implies midterm shipbuilding growth above prior ~4% guide, contingent on continued industrial base rebuilding, labor maturation, and award cadence .