Sign in
HL

Hamilton Lane INC (HLNE)·Q4 2025 Earnings Summary

Executive Summary

  • Q4 FY25 delivered double-digit top-line growth and solid profitability: total revenues rose 12% YoY to $197.97M, driven by higher management/advisory fees and a step-up in incentive fees; Non-GAAP EPS was $1.21, and diluted GAAP EPS was $1.23 . Versus S&P Global consensus, HLNE beat on revenue ($170.69M*) and EPS ($1.17*) for Q4; it also beat both in Q3 (revenue $157.95M*, EPS $1.10*) while narrowly missing revenue in Q2 ($154.17M* vs. $150.00M actual*) .*
  • Structural change creates more “recurring” performance revenue: the U.S. evergreen fund moved to a quarterly high-watermark methodology for performance fees (FRPR), triggering a $58M catch-up and inclusion of FRPR in FRE, while excluding stock-based comp from FRE going forward; management expects FRE margins in the high-40% range under the updated methodology .
  • AUM/FEAUM growth and wealth momentum: AUM reached $138.3B (+11% YoY); fee-earning AUM reached $72.0B (+10% YoY). Evergreen AUM was nearly $10.7B at quarter-end with ~$1B of net inflows in calendar Q1 2025 and minimal redemptions; May flows “look very strong” per management .
  • Capital return: the Board raised the dividend target by 10% to $2.16 annually ($0.54 quarterly declared; record date June 20; payable July 7) .
  • Potential stock catalysts: recurring FRPR in evergreen vehicles, accelerating wealth flows, and stable high-40% FRE margins; watch distribution expense drag and SMA growth re-acceleration as exits normalize .

What Went Well and What Went Wrong

  • What Went Well

    • High-watermark FRPR launched in U.S. evergreen fund; $58M of FRPR recognized for performance since inception; future evergreen launches expected to use the same structure .
    • Wealth momentum: “For calendar Q1 of 2025, we saw nearly $1 billion of net inflows across the [evergreen] platform… minimal redemptions,” and “May looks very strong… we are not seeing a change in redemptions” .
    • Pricing/mix tailwind: “Our blended fee rate continues to benefit from the shift… towards higher fee-rate specialized funds, most notably our evergreen products… over 60 basis points” (ex-retro) .
  • What Went Wrong

    • Expense intensity: Q4 compensation and benefits rose 23% YoY; G&A rose 20% YoY, with distribution commissions in G&A tied to wirehouse channels .
    • YoY pretax down, equity income softness: Income before taxes fell 9% YoY to $88.3M as “Equity in income of investees” slid 75% YoY to $3.6M and other income items normalized .
    • Evergreen carry balance declined QoQ due to realization: Evergreen allocated carried interest fell from $221.7M at 12/31 to $157.5M at 3/31, reflecting recognition of FRPR; mgmt noted the U.S. evergreen unrealized carry was “removed and realized” .

Financial Results

MetricQ4 FY2024Q3 FY2025Q4 FY2025
Total Revenues ($M)176.67 168.26 197.97
Management & Advisory Fees ($M)123.70 126.28 127.84
Incentive Fees ($M)52.96 41.98 70.14
Diluted GAAP EPS ($)1.26 1.32 1.23
Non-GAAP EPS ($)1.38 1.25 1.21
Fee Related Earnings ($M)59.71 54.23 90.35
Adjusted EBITDA ($M)91.10 92.68 101.69
Revenue Consensus Mean ($M)*157.95*170.69*
Primary EPS Consensus Mean ($)*1.10*1.17*
  • Margins
MarginQ4 FY2024Q3 FY2025Q4 FY2025
Fee Related Earnings Margin (%)48% 43% 49%
Adjusted EBITDA Margin (%)52% 55% 51%
  • Management & Advisory Fees – Mix (Three Months Ended March 31)
Category ($000s)Q4 FY2024Q4 FY2025
Specialized funds76,039 79,348
Customized separate accounts32,124 32,264
Advisory5,838 5,486
Reporting/monitoring/data/analytics6,413 8,020
Distribution management1,075 702
Fund reimbursement revenue2,215 2,018
Total123,704 127,838
  • Incentive Fees – Mix (Three Months Ended March 31)
Category ($000s)Q4 FY2024Q4 FY2025
Direct equity3,943 3,250
Secondaries29,419 2,029
Direct credit3,147 1,688
Evergreen5,530 61,162
Other specialized funds4,745 1,050
Customized separate accounts6,177 956
Total52,961 70,135
  • KPIs
KPIMar 31, 2024Dec 31, 2024Mar 31, 2025
AUM ($B)124.41 134.74 138.30
AUA ($B)796.17 821.24 819.47
Fee-Earning AUM ($B)65.75 70.99 72.05

Notes: Cells marked with an asterisk are S&P Global consensus values. Values retrieved from S&P Global.*

Guidance Changes

MetricPeriodPrevious Guidance/StatusCurrent Guidance/StatusChange
Dividend per share (annual target)FY25$1.96 (FY24 target) $2.16 target; $0.54 quarterly declared (record 6/20; pay 7/7) Raised 10%
FRE margin outlookOngoing~43% (Q2–Q3 reported), stable trend “High-40%” expected under new FRE methodology (ex-SBC; includes FRPR) Methodology updated; outlook stable/up
Evergreen performance fees (recognition)OngoingDeal-by-deal (realization-based) Quarterly high-watermark FRPR; $58M inception-to-date recognized in Q4 Structural change (more recurring)
U.S. evergreen fee termsOngoingMgmt fee 1.5%; incentive 12.5%; preferred return in place Mgmt fee 1.4%; incentive 10%; preferred return removed Lower headline fees; new structure

Earnings Call Themes & Trends

TopicPrevious Mentions (Q2 FY25 and Q3 FY25)Current Period (Q4 FY25)Trend
Evergreen platform growth/flowsQ2: AUM ~$8.4B; strong monthly net inflows >$220M; launched evergreen infrastructure; seeding with $100M notes . Q3: AUM ~$9.5B; avg monthly net inflows ~$294M in CQ4’24; Republic blockchain partnership planned .AUM nearly $10.7B; ~+$1B net inflows in CQ1’25; minimal redemptions; May “looks very strong” .Accelerating flows; expanding products/channels
FRPR high-watermark for evergreenNot discussedIntroduced; $58M FRPR catch-up; future evergreen funds to use it .New recurring performance revenue stream
Margins and SBCQ2/Q3 FRE margin 43%; equity-based comp run-rate ~$30M per year .FRE margin expected “high-40%” with new methodology; margin stability reiterated .Slightly higher run-rate post-recast; stable outlook
Tech/data/tokenizationQ2: Northern Trust partnership to distribute Cobalt analytics . Q3: Planned blockchain solutions with Republic .Strategic AI/middle-office investment in 73 Strings with GS/Blackstone et al. .Building digital/data ecosystem to scale
Macro/exit environmentExit activity “relatively muted,” holding periods extending; private equity seen less volatile/faster to recover in drawdowns .

Management Commentary

  • “After… the shareholder vote, we were then able to recognize and receive $58 million of fee-related performance revenues based on performance from inception of the fund to March 2025. Going forward, these fees will now be called fee-related performance revenues (FRPR)… included in our incentive fees. We will also be including FRPR as part of our fee related earnings metric.”
  • “Nearly one-third of [advisor] respondents plan to allocate 20% or more to the asset class… meaning that a total of nearly 60%… plan to allocate 10% or more to private market investments in 2025.”
  • “May looks very strong… We are not seeing a change in redemption… [volatility] is allowing advisors to… reduce public equity exposure… and make the move to the private market.”
  • “Our blended fee rate continues to benefit from the shift of fee-earning AUM towards higher fee-rate specialized funds, most notably our evergreen products… over 60 basis points.”
  • “We continue to… lean in hard on the technology side. 73 Strings is the most recent example… AI-powered… streamlines middle office processes… alongside Goldman Sachs, Blackstone, Golub Capital, and Broadhaven Ventures.”

Q&A Highlights

  • Margins and methodology: Management expects FRE margins in the high-40% under the updated approach (ex-SBC, includes FRPR); quarter-to-quarter variability remains, but annual stability is the focus .
  • Distribution economics: Wirehouse distribution fees remain predominantly upfront (minor tails), pressuring early-year margin but tied to growth; no major change in structure .
  • Separate accounts: SMA growth is most impacted by macro and slow exits; pipeline is robust and should flow faster as markets normalize; management is prioritizing evergreen build-out near term .
  • Wealth flows: Minimal redemptions and strong net inflows persisted into May despite tariff headlines; advisors using volatility to reallocate into private markets .
  • Institutional adoption of evergreen: Early but growing (150 institutions, >15% of capital); equal fee rates in evergreen mitigate classic fee compression concerns; seen as complementary to drawdown funds .

Estimates Context

  • Q4 FY25: Revenue $197.97M vs. $170.69M consensus*; Non-GAAP/Primary EPS $1.21 vs. $1.17 consensus* — both beats .*
  • Q3 FY25: Revenue $168.26M vs. $157.95M consensus*; Non-GAAP/Primary EPS $1.25 vs. $1.10 consensus* — beats .*
  • Q2 FY25: Revenue $150.00M actual* vs. $154.17M consensus* — slight miss; EPS $1.07 actual* vs. $1.09 consensus* — roughly in line/slight miss.*

Implications: The new high-watermark FRPR structure increases the recurrence and visibility of incentive revenues (positive for EPS/FRE estimate trajectories), while a small reduction in U.S. evergreen fee rates slightly trims management fee yield; net, the setup supports upward revisions to out-year FRE/EPS if wealth flows remain robust and SMA deployment normalizes .

Notes: Consensus values marked with an asterisk are S&P Global data. Values retrieved from S&P Global.*

Key Takeaways for Investors

  • Evergreen FRPR shift is a structural positive, creating recurring performance revenue and lifting FRE (with methodology recast) — a key multiple driver .
  • Wealth channel momentum remains strong with minimal redemptions and accelerating net inflows; management sees continued product expansion (infrastructure, secondaries, venture) .
  • Mix supports pricing: higher-fee specialized funds (evergreen) continue to raise the blended fee rate (>60 bps ex-retro), aiding topline growth .
  • Margins: Despite wirehouse distribution expense and higher SBC, management targets stable high-40% FRE margins post-changes — supportive for estimate stability .
  • Watch SMA re-acceleration as exits normalize; contracted commitments provide latent FEAUM growth .
  • Balance sheet remains a strategic asset (seed capital for evergreen, tech investments such as 73 Strings) with modest leverage ($290M debt at 3/31/25) .
  • Near-term trading lens: Emphasis on sustained net flows, cadence of FRPR accruals, and expense discipline vs. distribution fees; medium-term thesis centers on wealth penetration, evergreen scale, and recurring performance revenue .
Disclosures: All factual statements and figures from company filings and transcripts are cited inline. S&P Global consensus values are marked with an asterisk (*) and labeled “Values retrieved from S&P Global.”