HB
HOME BANCSHARES INC (HOMB)·Q1 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Record quarter: net income $115.2M and diluted EPS $0.58; adjusted EPS $0.56; total revenue $260.1M, with NIM up 5 bps q/q to 4.44% and ROA at 2.07% .
- Beat vs S&P Global consensus: revenue $260.1M vs $255.2M*, Primary EPS (normalized) $0.56 vs $0.54*, driven by higher net interest spread and lower deposit costs despite lower loan yields* .
- Asset quality improved notably post Q4 “Texas cleanup”: NPL/loans fell to 0.60% (0.67% in Q4), NPA/assets to 0.56% (0.63% in Q4); net recoveries were $4.1M in Q1 vs $53.4M net charge-offs in Q4 .
- Community bank loan growth (+$291.5M) more than offset CCFG C&I runoff (-$103.9M), with deposits up ~$395M q/q; CET1 rose to 15.4% and TBVPS reached $13.15, both at/near records .
- Post-quarter catalyst: Board raised quarterly dividend to $0.20 (+2.6%) payable June 4, 2025; management also plans to pay off ~$140M sub debt before its step-up to 9.7% on July 1, lowering interest expense (and total risk-based capital by ~76 bps) .
(Values marked with * are from S&P Global; see disclaimer in Estimates Context.)
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
What Went Well
- Margin and profitability: NIM expanded to 4.44% (4.39% in Q4; 4.28% in Q3), driving ROA to 2.07% and ROTCE to 18.39%; CEO called it “a record setting first quarter” and “near perfect quarter” .
- Funding mix/pricing: Cost on interest-bearing deposits fell to 2.67% (2.80% in Q4), and strong deposit growth (~$395M) supported liquidity; management expects further relief as ~$1.0B CDs roll in Q2–Q3 .
- Credit normalization: After the Q4 cleanup, Q1 saw net recoveries of $4.1M, NPL/loans improved to 0.60% and coverage rose to 312% of NPLs; management expects additional recoveries (~$1.5M/quarter on a large relationship) .
What Went Wrong
- Core loan yields drifted down to 7.38% from 7.49% in Q4 as rates declined, and net interest income FTE dipped to $217.2M from $219.5M in Q4 despite margin expansion .
- CCFG remained a headwind: portfolio down ~$104M, entirely in C&I; management effectively exited broadly syndicated loans and is selectively rebuilding structured facilities (C&I now <10% of CCFG) .
- Competitive pressure and macro uncertainty: management flagged aggressive competitor deposit rates (up to ~4.5%), loan quotes in the 6% range, elevated Q2 payoffs, and tariff uncertainty potentially delaying projects .
Financial Results
Headline results vs prior periods and estimates
- Revenue beat by ~$4.9M vs consensus; Primary EPS (normalized) beat by ~$0.02* .
- S&P Global disclaimer: Values marked with * retrieved from S&P Global.
Key balance sheet and credit KPIs
Guidance Changes
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- “A record setting first quarter has paved the way for a strong year.” – John Allison, Chairman & CEO .
- “Our continued conservative philosophy...have led to an almost perfect quarter… setting six new performance record[s].” – John Allison .
- “For the quarter, excluding event income, the net interest margin was 4.42% versus 4.36% in Q4… deposit growth… will allow us to continue to work on negotiated deposit pricing.” – Stephen (John) Tipton, CEO Centennial Bank .
- “Recoveries from the fourth quarter cleanup were in process with nearly $7 million recovered… I still believe [total] recoveries… exceed $30 million over time.” – Kevin Hester, President & CLO .
Q&A Highlights
- Margin durability and deposit repricing: ~$1.0B of CDs mature over Q2–Q3; opportunity to lower rates 10–20 bps; NIM targeted to hold near current range despite rate cuts .
- Loan production and pricing: Q1 new originations >$800M at ~7.75% coupon; competition quoting in the 6s on some terms; willingness to defend pricing .
- Credit recoveries: Expect ~$1.5M per quarter from a large charged-off Texas relationship; additional recoveries possible as NPAs work down; further NPA improvement expected in Q2 .
- Capital actions: Plan to repay ~$140M sub debt before 9.7% step-up; buybacks continue opportunistically; holding company cash ~$582M .
- Expenses: Core non-interest expense run-rate targeted around $111M; Q1 included ~$2M after-tax legal tied to Texas lawsuit; anticipated to be non-recurring if settlement finalized .
Estimates Context
- Q1 2025: Primary EPS Consensus Mean $0.54 (8 est.) vs actual primary EPS $0.56*; Revenue Consensus Mean $255.2M (7 est.) vs actual $260.1M* (both beats).
- S&P Global disclaimer: Values retrieved from S&P Global.
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Beat-and-raise cadence on fundamentals: revenue and normalized EPS beat; NIM expanded; asset quality improved with net recoveries, supporting premium ROTCE and record TBVPS .
- Near-term tailwinds: ~$1.0B CD maturities, falling deposit betas, planned sub-debt repayment, and dividend increase enhance earnings power and capital returns .
- Watch list: loan yields slipping with rate cuts and competitive pricing; management discipline on pricing may trade some volume for margin .
- CCFG reset largely complete: exit from broadly syndicated C&I reduces risk; selective rebuild of structured C&I and stable CRE pipeline point to steadier balances ahead .
- Expense control credible: management aims to hold ~$111M quarterly non-interest expense ex unusuals; Texas legal costs likely abate on settlement .
- Stock narrative: “Fortress” capital and 2% ROA ambition, plus shareholder-friendly capital deployment and M&A optionality, are likely key catalysts into 2Q/2H’25 .
Additional Data Detail (Operating & Financial)
- Operating drivers: Net interest income FTE was $217.2M (vs $219.5M in Q4), with a $10.0M decrease in interest income offset by a $7.7M decrease in interest expense; deposit cost fell to 2.67% and FHLB/other borrowings costs declined post-BTFP payoff .
- Non-interest items: Non-interest income $45.4M with $3.9M special income from equity investments; non-interest expense $112.9M; efficiency ratio 42.22% .
- Credit metrics by region available show broad-based improvement q/q in NPLs and NPAs, with the largest NPA balances in Florida and Texas; allowance to loans stable at 1.87% and coverage to NPLs improved to 312% .
All document-based figures are cited above. Values marked with * are from S&P Global.