Sign in

Karen Parkhill

Chief Financial Officer at HPHP
Executive

About Karen Parkhill

Chief Financial Officer of HP Inc. since August 5, 2024; previously EVP & CFO of Medtronic (2016–2024), Vice Chair & CFO of Comerica, and CFO of J.P. Morgan Commercial Banking . She holds a BBA and BS in Mathematics from Southern Methodist University and an MBA from the University of Chicago Booth School of Business . HP’s FY24 delivered $53.6B in net revenue, $4.52B non-GAAP operating profit, and $3.32B non-GAAP free cash flow; 2022–2024 PARSU TSR performance was at the 69th percentile versus S&P 500 .

Past Roles

OrganizationRoleYearsStrategic impact
Medtronic plcEVP & CFO2016–2024Led finance through pandemic, operating model shift, and innovation-driven strategy .
Comerica IncorporatedVice Chairman & CFO~2011–2016Guided a large financial services firm’s capital, liquidity, and reporting .
J.P. MorganCFO, Commercial Banking; MD Investment Banking~2007–2011; ~2001–2007Led Commercial Banking finance and executed M&A/capital markets across sectors .

External Roles

OrganizationPositionCommittee/FocusNotes
American ExpressDirectorChair, Risk CommitteeCurrent public company board role .
Non-profit/academicTrustee/Board rolesBoys & Girls Clubs of America; Methodist Health System; SMU Cox Exec BoardPrior roles indicated by HP release .

Fixed Compensation

ItemAmount/TermFY24 ActualNotes
Base salary$950,000 (CFO role)$230,303 paid (partial year)CFO salary level established; partial-year pay after Aug 5 start .
Target bonus %135% of base salary (CFO)85% of target paid (pro-rated) = $264,273FY24 corporate metrics + MBO funding led to 85% payout for Parkhill .
Sign-on cash bonus$1,500,00050% in Feb 2025; 50% in Aug 2025, subject to conditionsRepayment obligation if resignation/for-cause before one-year anniversary .

Performance Compensation

ComponentMetricWeightTargetActual FY24Payout/ImpactVesting/Mechanics
Annual Incentive (Corporate)GAAP Net Revenue25%$53.6B$53.6B24.9% of target (pre-discretion) Annual cash bonus; overall financial factor reduced to 60% for parity .
Annual Incentive (Corporate)Adjusted non-GAAP Operating Profit25%$5.1B$4.8B17.1% of target (pre-discretion) Governor ties revenue/FCF funding to OP thresholds .
Annual Incentive (Corporate)Non-GAAP Free Cash Flow25%$3.4B$3.3B24.3% of target (pre-discretion) FCF capped when OP below target; total financial reduced to 60% .
Annual Incentive (Individual)MBOs (Culture/People/Sustainable Impact)25%25.0%Achieved at target25.0% for Parkhill Qualitative objectives supporting long-term success .
RSUs (New-Hire)Time-vested RSUs$15,000,000 grant458,015 units grantedValue set by $15M ÷ Aug 5, 2024 close Vests one-third on Aug 5, 2025/2026/2027; next tranche vests if involuntary not for cause, others forfeited .
LTI Framework for NEOsPARSUs (EPS 80%; KGA revenue 20%) + TSR modifier60% PARSUs / 40% RSUsMulti-yearEPS Yr1 (FY24) achieved at 80%; TSR modifier neutral in FY22–24 cyclePARSU payout bands 0–300% with TSR ±50% modifier 3-year cliff vesting; FY26 KGA revenue determines 20% portion .

Equity Ownership & Alignment

ItemDetailValue
Beneficial ownership (12/31/2024)Common shares directly owned— (no direct shares; unvested RSUs only) .
Unvested RSUs outstanding (10/31/2024)Shares and market value461,603 units; $16,396,142 at $35.52 close .
Scheduled vesting (RSUs)Release dates and unitsAug 5, 2025: 152,671; Aug 5, 2026: 152,672; Aug 5, 2027: 152,672 (+ dividend equivalents) .
OptionsExercisable/unexercisableNone disclosed for Parkhill .
Ownership guidelinesRequirement5x base salary within 5 years; NEOs <5 years “on pace” .
Hedging/pledgingPolicyHedging prohibited; pledging/margin largely prohibited for executives .

Employment Terms

  • Severance plan (SPEO): CFO multiple 1.5x base pay plus average bonus (or target if <3 years), subject to 2.99x cap; pro-rata annual bonus and pro-rata vesting of equity on involuntary not-for-cause; double-trigger CIC with full vesting (target for cycles not completed) .
  • Parkhill-specific RSU term: If involuntary not-for-cause and release executed, the next scheduled tranche vests; other unvested RSUs forfeited .
  • Clawbacks: Dodd-Frank compliant Mandatory Recovery Policy (restatement-driven) and Misconduct Clawback Policy (three-year lookback) covering cash and equity incentives .
  • Contracts: HP does not use fixed-term executive employment contracts for senior executives .
  • Insider trading/ownership: Strong insider trading controls; executive stock ownership guidelines; no tax gross-ups on perquisites or CIC; no option repricing without shareholder approval .

Compensation Structure Signals

  • Shift to performance equity: Non-CEO NEO long-term mix emphasizes PARSUs (60%) over RSUs (40%), increasing at-risk pay alignment tied to EPS/KGA revenue with TSR modifier .
  • FY24 annual bonus governance: Use of payout governors and discretionary reduction of the corporate financial factor to 60% to align with broad employee plan—mitigates windfall risk .
  • Say-on-pay support: 91% approval at 2024 annual meeting underscores investor alignment with pay design .

Performance & Track Record (context)

  • HP FY24 outcomes: Net revenue $53.6B; non-GAAP operating profit $4.52B; non-GAAP FCF $3.32B; PARSU cycle FY22–24 TSR at 69th percentile, with EPS cycle payout at 52% for FY22 PARSUs .
  • Parkhill’s early impact: HRC credited her with “immediate impact,” managing an earnings call, re-starting the transformation office, and aligning teams; MBO funded at 25% .

Risk Indicators & Potential Trading Pressures

  • Vesting calendar: Significant RSU releases on Aug 5, 2025/2026/2027 may create periodic selling pressure windows if shares are sold to cover taxes or diversify .
  • Retention: Large unvested RSU grant ($15M initial award; 461,603 units outstanding) and SPEO protections reduce near-term departure risk .
  • Governance mitigants: Prohibition on hedging/pledging; robust clawbacks; no fixed-term contracts; double-trigger CIC .
  • Ownership alignment: 5x salary guideline and performance-weighted LTI support skin-in-the-game, with NEOs <5 years tracking to compliance .

Investment Implications

  • Alignment: Pay-for-performance architecture (EPS/KGA revenue with TSR modifier) and ownership rules suggest strong alignment of CFO incentives with shareholder value creation .
  • Retention and overhang: The three-year vesting of a sizable new-hire RSU grant is a retention anchor; anticipate potential flow-related effects around annual August vest dates .
  • Governance quality: High say-on-pay approval (91%), clawbacks, hedging/pledging bans, and SPEO double-trigger CIC reduce adverse incentive risk and agency costs .
  • Execution risk: FY24 financial metrics achieved near target on revenue/FCF but below target on operating profit; CFO’s mandate includes driving operational rigor and growth—watch for improved OP leverage and EPS trajectories reflected in future PARSU cycles .
Key data references: HP 2025 Proxy (DEF 14A) and HP/Medtronic press releases for appointment and biography.