IO
IMPERIAL OIL LTD (IMO)·Q4 2024 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q4 2024 net income was $1.225B with diluted EPS of $2.37; total revenues and other income were $12.607B. Sequentially, EPS rose vs Q3 2024 ($2.33), while revenue declined; year-over-year revenue and EPS were down from Q4 2023 ($13.109B, $2.47) .
- Cash flow remained robust: cash from operating activities was $1.789B; free cash flow was $1.385B. The company returned $1.792B to shareholders in the quarter via $317M dividends and $1.475B accelerated share repurchases, and announced a 20% dividend increase to $0.72 per share for Q1 2025 .
- Operations were strong: upstream production averaged 460 kboe/d, the highest quarterly level in over 30 years (adjusted for XTO), while downstream capacity utilization was 95% with 411 kb/d throughput .
- Guidance update: 2025 plan targets upstream production of 433–456 kboe/d, Kearl 280–290 kb/d, Cold Lake 150–160 kb/d, Syncrude 75–80 kb/d; downstream throughput 405–415 kb/d (94–96% utilization); Strathcona renewable diesel start-up targeted around mid-2025 .
- Consensus estimates from S&P Global were unavailable today; as a result, estimate comparisons (beats/misses) are not provided.*
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
What Went Well
- Record upstream production: “highest quarterly production in over 30 years” at 460 kboe/d; Kearl set a full-year record (281 kb/d gross; unit cash costs below prior target) and Cold Lake delivered strong Grand Rapids production (22 kb/d SA‑SAGD) .
- Downstream resilience: 95% utilization in Q4 despite planned turnaround; management highlighted advantaged Canadian refining (feedstock access, logistics, strong demand) supporting earnings vs softer U.S. peers .
- Shareholder returns and dividend hike: $1.792B returned in Q4; dividend raised to $0.72 (largest nominal increase). Management emphasized reliable, growing dividend and strong breakeven discipline .
What Went Wrong
- Margins compressed: downstream margins declined vs prior year; petroleum product sales fell to 458 kb/d from 476 kb/d due to lower wholesale volumes .
- Kearl quarterly production dipped year-over-year (299 kb/d vs 308 kb/d gross) even as full-year hit a record; Syncrude was lower (81 kb/d vs 85 kb/d) .
- Macro headwinds: crude prices decreased vs Q3 and industry refining margins declined on increased supply; management also flagged tariff uncertainty as a risk, though asserted operational and integration resilience .
Financial Results
Segment net income
Operational KPIs
Estimate comparisons
- Consensus EPS/Revenue for Q4 2024: Unavailable via S&P Global today; estimate comparisons omitted.*
Guidance Changes
Planned 2025 turnarounds (operational impact)
- Upstream: Kearl (Q2: ~9 kb/d; $57M), Cold Lake (Q2: ~3 kb/d; $30M), Syncrude (Q3: ~6 kb/d; $111M). Downstream & Chemical: Strathcona (Q2: ~3 kb/d; $19M), Nanticoke (Q2: ~6 kb/d; $41M), Sarnia (Q3/4: ~3 kb/d; $51M) .
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- “Our robust financial results in 2024 were driven by outstanding operational performance…Downstream and Cold Lake performances were both at the upper end of our guidance” — Brad Corson (CEO) .
- “We achieved the highest fourth quarter production in the past 30 years…benefits of TMX pipeline and additional egress” .
- “Our unit cash cost reduction of nearly USD 3/bbl vs 2023; Kearl full-year unit cash costs of USD 19.67/bbl, targeting USD 18/bbl” .
- “Largest nominal dividend increase in company history…reflects confidence in delivering guidance” .
- “Strathcona renewable diesel construction well advanced; feedstock and hydrogen supply aligned for mid‑year start-up” .
Q&A Highlights
- Refining resilience vs U.S. peers: advantaged crudes, strong demand, logistics to premium outlets; high utilization supported earnings despite softer cracks .
- Cold Lake Grand Rapids: Phase 1 performance exceeded expectations at ~22 kb/d; solvent-assisted SAGD materially lowers unit costs; future phases under evaluation .
- Capital allocation and M&A: priority on reliable, growing dividend, NCIB/SIB as needed; high bar for M&A vs organic options like Aspen; comfortable leverage .
- TMX tolls: shipping regularly; timing uncertain; structural differential benefits realized .
- Breakeven discipline: cash breakeven <USD 25 WTI; with sustaining capital+dividends <USD 35 WTI; supports dividend growth capacity .
- Tariffs risk: company expects resilience given integration, crude slate flexibility; focus on lowest cost supply and market optionality .
Estimates Context
- S&P Global consensus estimates for Q4 2024 EPS and revenue were unavailable due to data access limits today; therefore, beat/miss analysis vs Street is not provided. Management’s narrative indicates strong operational execution offset by lower realizations and margins, but without consensus data, we cannot quantify estimate surprises.*
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Operational momentum: Record upstream volume and 95% downstream utilization underscore execution quality; Cold Lake Grand Rapids is structurally lowering costs and boosting production .
- Cash returns: Continued acceleration of buybacks and a 20% dividend hike signal confidence in free cash flow durability even through margin cycles .
- Cost trajectory: Clear line of sight to further unit cash cost cuts (Kearl USD 18, Cold Lake USD 13), tightening breakevens and expanding dividend headroom .
- Mid‑2025 catalyst: Strathcona renewable diesel commissioning could add product optionality and incremental cash flow in H2 2025, supported by local feedstock and regulatory incentives .
- Macro risk management: TMX-driven narrower differentials aid realizations; management sees resilience to potential tariffs via integration and slate flexibility .
- 2025 setup: Guidance implies higher volumes (433–456 kboe/d) with lighter downstream turnarounds vs 2024; production growth plus cost reductions should support sustained capital returns .
- Watchlist: Monitor downstream margins, petroleum product sales normalization, tariff developments, and clarity on TMX tolls and Pathways policy support for CCS .
*Estimates unavailable via S&P Global today; as a result, estimate comparisons (beats/misses) are not provided.