IC
INTEL CORP (INTC)·Q3 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q3 2025 delivered upside on revenue ($13.7B, +3% YoY) and a material non-GAAP EPS beat ($0.23 vs S&P Global consensus ~$0.007), with non-GAAP gross margin at 40.0% vs guidance of ~36%—driven by higher revenue, favorable mix, and lower inventory reserves. Bold surprise: non-GAAP EPS and gross margin both well above guidance and consensus .
S&P Global values marked with * below. - Guidance: Q4 revenue $12.8–$13.8B, non-GAAP GM ~36.5%, non-GAAP EPS $0.08; broadly in line with S&P consensus revenue ~$13.369B* and EPS ~$0.081*; Altera excluded from Q4 .
- Strategic catalysts: $5.7B accelerated U.S. government funding, announced $5.0B NVIDIA and $2.0B SoftBank equity investments; NVLink-based collaboration with NVIDIA to co-develop multi-generation AI/data center and PC products .
- Watchpoints: persistent capacity constraints on Intel 10/7, Foundry losses (though improving), and explicit risk that SEC accounting views on government-related transactions could prompt material revisions to Q3 results .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
What Went Well
- Non-GAAP gross margin beat (40.0% vs ~36% guided), non-GAAP EPS $0.23 above guidance of ~$0.00 and consensus; revenue came in above the high end of guidance ($13.7B vs $12.6–$13.6B guided) .
- CCG strength and AI server CPU tailwinds: CCG revenue $8.5B (+8% QoQ) and DCAI up 5% sequentially, supported by Windows 11 refresh, Lunar/Arrow Lake ramps, and Granite Rapids traction; “demand outpacing supply” persists .
- Strategic balance sheet actions: $5.7B U.S. government funding received in Q3; announced NVIDIA $5.0B and SoftBank $2.0B investments; Altera stake sale proceeds; CEO: “AI is accelerating demand for compute…position us well to capitalize” .
What Went Wrong
- Ongoing supply constraints (Intel 10/7), substrate tightness, and capacity prioritization; CFO: shortages likely peak in Q1, limiting ability to buck normal seasonality .
- Foundry remains loss-making despite sequential improvement (Q3 Foundry operating loss $(2.3)B vs $(3.2)B in Q2); GAAP gross margin guide down sequentially into Q4 on mix and new product ramps .
- Accounting risk: Intel flagged limited precedent and ongoing SEC staff consultation; Q3 results may be revised if differing views arise (potentially material) .
Financial Results
Core P&L vs prior year and prior quarter
Segment revenue and operating income
Estimates vs Actuals and Guidance
Values retrieved from S&P Global.*
Guidance Changes
Additional note: Intel flagged that Q3 results may be revised pending SEC consultation on U.S. government transactions accounting .
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- CEO: “AI is accelerating demand for compute and creating attractive opportunities across our portfolio… Intel’s industry-leading CPUs and ecosystem, along with our unique U.S.-based leading-edge logic manufacturing and R&D, position us well to capitalize on these trends over time.”
- CFO: “Current demand is outpacing supply, a trend we expect will persist into 2026.”
- CFO on Q3 drivers: “Non-GAAP gross margin was 40%, four points better than our guidance on higher revenue, a more favorable mix, and lower inventory reserves…”
- CEO on Foundry: “Fab 52… dedicated to high-volume manufacturing… is now fully operational… our conviction in the market potential for Intel Foundry continues to grow.”
- CFO on 18A yields: “Yields are adequate to address supply…but not yet where we need them to be to drive appropriate margins; by end of next year we’ll probably be in that space.”
Q&A Highlights
- Foundry margin trajectory: CFO expects Foundry gross margins to improve with scale and leading-edge mix (18A/14A), plus startup cost normalization over coming years .
- Supply constraints: Tight across Intel 10/7 and substrates; Q1 likely peak constraints; company demand-shaping toward server CPU mix .
- 18A and capacity: Ramp continues through 2026; incremental capacity not large next year; yield trajectory improving toward industry-acceptable levels beyond next year .
- NVIDIA collaboration: Multi-year, NVLink-based fusion with x86 to expand Intel’s TAM; heavy engineering engagement; incremental opportunity beyond current TAM .
- Q4 mechanics: Non-GAAP GM down sequentially on mix/new product ramp (Core Ultra 3) and Altera deconsolidation; expected NCI ~$350–$400M GAAP .
Estimates Context
- Q3 2025 beat: Revenue $13.653B vs ~$13.138B* consensus; non-GAAP EPS $0.23 vs ~$0.007* consensus—significant upside on margin execution and mix .
Values retrieved from S&P Global.* - Q4 2025 in-line: Guidance midpoint (~$13.3B) broadly aligned with ~$13.369B* consensus; non-GAAP EPS guide $0.08 essentially in line with ~$0.081* .
Values retrieved from S&P Global.* - FY 2025/2026 consensus: ~$52.55B* / ~$53.84B* revenue and ~$0.34* / ~$0.60* EPS; trajectory will hinge on Foundry margin ramp, client mix, and server competitiveness.
Values retrieved from S&P Global.*
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Q3 print showed tangible margin execution and mix benefits; the magnitude of the non-GAAP EPS and GM beats is a positive inflection point despite capacity limits .
- Near-term setup: Q4 guide is in-line; expect sequential GM headwind from early Core Ultra 3 ramp and Altera deconsolidation; constraints likely peak in Q1—be mindful of typical seasonality .
- Structural story: Foundry loss narrowing with 18A/14A milestones and Fab 52 operational; watch customer commitments and yield trajectory into 2026 for margin leverage .
- Strategic capital support reduces risk: $5.7B U.S. funding plus NVIDIA/SoftBank equity bolster liquidity and flexibility; debt paydown underway .
- Risk flag: SEC accounting consultation on government transactions could lead to material Q3 revisions; incorporate this uncertainty into near-term positioning .
- AI platform exposure is broadening via NVIDIA collaboration and inference GPU roadmap (Crescent Island); monitor translation to revenue/GM in 2026+ .
- Trading lens: Strong beat with in-line guide and supply constraints suggests limited near-term estimate upside; any clarity on SEC accounting and capacity relief could be catalysts. Longer-term thesis rests on Foundry margin inflection, client cost improvements, and server competitiveness .