JH
JELD-WEN Holding, Inc. (JELD)·Q1 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q1 2025 was very weak on volume with net revenues $776.0M (-19.1% YoY) and Adjusted EBITDA $21.9M (2.8% margin), pressured by a court‑ordered Towanda divestiture and a ~16% volume/mix decline; a ~$125M non‑cash goodwill impairment drove GAAP net loss to ($179.8)M .
- Versus S&P Global consensus, JELD slightly beat on revenue ($776.0M vs $769.7M*) and Adjusted EPS (-$0.17 vs -$0.19*); management withdrew full‑year 2025 guidance due to tariff uncertainty, but expects Q2 Adjusted EBITDA to be “slightly above” Q1 .
- Segment results: North America revenue $530.6M (-22.0% YoY) and Europe $245.4M (-12.1% YoY); both saw lower volumes, with NA impacted by Towanda and prior Midwest retailer loss; Adjusted EBITDA fell across segments .
- Balance sheet/cash: Net cash used in operations ($83.5M), capex $42.0M, Free Cash Flow ($125.4M); Net Debt rose to $1,049.7M and leverage to 4.6x (TTM Adjusted EBITDA) from 3.8x at YE2024 .
- Stock reaction catalysts: withdrawal of full‑year guidance, tariff pass‑through plan (~$55M annualized, ~$30M in 2025) and rising leverage; management nevertheless reiterated ~$150M capex and ~$100M transformation plus ~$50M short‑term cost actions in 2025 .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
What Went Well
- Management executing transformation: Q1 Adjusted EBITDA $21.9M despite volume shock; reiterated ~$100M transformation benefits and ~$50M short‑term actions with 40% H1/60% H2 cadence .
- Early operational improvements and customer service focus: CEO highlighted quality and OTIF gains (e.g., Kissimmee sprint) and new builder wins ahead of plan, albeit not yet material in P&L .
- Tariff exposure manageable and pass‑through strategy: annualized impact ~$55M, ~$30M in 2025; limited direct China materials (<1% Tier 1/2), planning to pass through surcharges to customers .
What Went Wrong
- Severe volume/mix headwinds: Core Revenue down ~15% and total volume/mix down ~16%, larger hit in North America; Adjusted EBITDA margin fell 440bps YoY to 2.8% .
- Non‑cash goodwill impairment (~$124.6M pre‑tax) in North America drove GAAP net loss to ($179.8)M and operating loss margin to (22.1%) .
- Cash burn and leverage increased: FCF ($125.4M) in Q1; Net Debt Leverage up to 4.6x; management withdrew FY25 guidance given escalating tariff/macro uncertainty .
Financial Results
Actuals vs Prior Periods
Q1 2025 Actual vs S&P Global Consensus
Values retrieved from S&P Global.
Note: Company reports Adjusted EBITDA of $21.9M; SPGI “EBITDA” may be non‑adjusted and not directly comparable .
Segment Breakdown (Q1 2025 vs Q1 2024)
KPIs and Balance Sheet
Guidance Changes
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- CEO: “We continued to execute our transformation, removing cost and improving focus… However, the pace of market deterioration continues to outweigh the benefits of our cost actions.”
- CFO: “Revenue for the first quarter was $776 million… Adjusted EBITDA for the quarter came in at $22 million… Free cash flow was a use of $125 million” .
- CEO on tariff strategy: “We don’t see significant challenges in getting the surcharges into the market… we are onshoring capacity… to create maybe in the short term, a higher cost base, but longer term, a lower cost base” .
- CEO on Q2 outlook: “We anticipate that our second quarter adjusted EBITDA will be slightly above first quarter levels.” .
Q&A Highlights
- Tariff pass‑through confidence: Management plans to pass ~$30M of 2025 tariff costs to customers; limited direct China exposure; timing impacts in Q2 expected to be immaterial .
- Seasonality muted: Q2 uptick expected but off a low base; April demand remained softer than expected .
- Transformation cadence and productivity: ~$150M benefits in 2025 (100 + 50), with 40/60 H1/H2; productivity remains challenged at low volumes due to underutilized sites .
- Balance sheet/liquidity: Leverage 4.6x; ample liquidity including undrawn $500M revolver; evaluating sale‑leaseback and asset sales .
- Towanda impact: EBITDA impact trending toward higher end of $25–$50M range, per retention outcomes .
Estimates Context
- Revenue: Actual $776.0M vs consensus $769.7M* (small beat).
- EPS: Adjusted EPS ($0.17) vs consensus ($0.19)* (beat).
- EBITDA: SPGI “EBITDA” consensus $20.76M* vs SPGI actual ($6.26M)*; company’s Adjusted EBITDA was $21.9M, indicating measure mismatch (non‑GAAP vs SPGI basis) .
Values retrieved from S&P Global.
Where estimates may adjust:
- Street likely reduces outer‑quarter growth assumptions given guidance withdrawal and muted Q2 seasonality commentary; tariff pass‑through should mitigate price/cost, but demand elasticity remains unclear .
- Segment EBITDA trajectories likely revised down for North America amid persistent volume underutilization and Towanda headwinds .
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Narrative headwinds intensified: guidance withdrawal, deep volume declines, and goodwill impairment underscore a tougher macro/tariff backdrop; near‑term trading likely driven by tariff headlines and Q2 demand cadence .
- Tactical positive: Q2 Adjusted EBITDA guided “slightly above” Q1 and tariff surcharges planned; watch for evidence of pass‑through effectiveness and margin stabilization in Q2 print .
- Transformation remains the structural thesis: ~$100M core plus ~$50M near‑term cost actions in 2025, with automation/network consolidation to reset cost base; back‑half weighted benefits .
- Liquidity cushion but elevated leverage: Net Debt Leverage 4.6x and FCF burn in Q1; monitor working capital discipline, capex pacing (~$150M maintained), and potential sale‑leaseback/asset sales .
- Segment watch: North America volume underutilization is the main drag; Europe seeing productivity offsets but still volume‑soft; any stabilization in builder traffic/new wins could be upside optionality in H2 .
- Estimate risk skew: modest beats vs Q1 consensus on revenue/EPS; Street likely revisits H2 uplift assumptions until demand/seasonality normalize and tariff visibility improves .
Citations:
*Values retrieved from S&P Global.