Q3 2024 Earnings Summary
- Kinder Morgan's project backlog has increased by 34% from $3.8 billion to $5.1 billion, indicating significant growth opportunities driven by LNG exports, power, and industrial demand growth.
- The company can fund approximately $2.5 billion per year in growth capital expenditures from cash flow, with additional balance sheet capacity, while maintaining a strong debt-to-EBITDA ratio around 4x, showcasing financial flexibility and prudent management.
- Kinder Morgan is pursuing significant new projects like the Mississippi Crossing and Trident pipelines, aiming to capitalize on the growing need for natural gas in the Southeast and Gulf Coast regions, positioning the company for continued growth.
- Uncertainty in Project Realization: Kinder Morgan acknowledges that not all projects in their potential pipeline may come to fruition, especially the larger ones which "can take longer to develop" . This uncertainty might impact the company's future growth projections.
- Potential Increase in Capital Expenditures and Debt: The company indicates that capital expenditures could increase beyond the current guidance of $2 billion per year, potentially to "$2 billion, $3 billion or something like that" . They also mention the possibility of using balance sheet capacity, which implies taking on additional debt, to fund these projects .
- Reluctance to Unlock Shareholder Value through Asset Separation: Despite a competitor's success in spinning out their liquids business, Kinder Morgan does not see significant benefits in separating their products business from their natural gas assets. They mention "there's not a big incentive to incur transaction costs, dis-synergies... that would make sense right now" , potentially missing opportunities to reflect better value in each segment.
-
Backlog Growth and CapEx
Q: How will growth projects affect CapEx plans?
A: Our backlog has increased 34% from $3.8 billion to $5.1 billion over the past year [0]. We expect annual CapEx to remain at approximately $2 billion, but it could exceed that if needed [2]. We can fund up to $2.5 billion per year from cash flow and have balance sheet capacity for more [2][14]. -
Cumberland Project Court Decision
Q: How does the court ruling affect the Cumberland project?
A: The Sixth Circuit stayed our Army Corps and Tennessee permits, preventing us from starting construction [6]. We believe the decision is wrong and are working with agencies to vigorously defend the permits [6]. We've overcome similar challenges successfully in the past [6]. -
Mississippi Crossing and Trident Projects
Q: What's the outlook for Mississippi Crossing and Trident?
A: These projects address the need for more gas moving from west to east [0]. Mississippi Crossing can be scaled up to 2 Bcf to serve Southeast markets [0][4]. We're excited about these projects and are working closely with customers [0]. -
Demand Risk at Agua Dulce
Q: Is there a risk of oversupply at Agua Dulce in 2026?
A: If LNG projects are delayed, there could be pricing exposure [8]. However, we have long-term contracts with shippers [8]. Additionally, we can buy cheap gas during such times, which presents an opportunity [8]. -
Expected Returns on Projects
Q: Are returns improving on new projects?
A: Returns are consistent with what we've achieved historically and what we've targeted [3]. While multiples may vary, overall returns meet our objectives [3]. -
Operating Leverage and Capacity
Q: How does increased gas demand impact capacity?
A: We have capacity on some gathering systems, especially in the Eagle Ford [12]. Our transmission pipelines are running nearly full; upside comes as contracts roll and from providing ancillary services during volatility [12]. -
CO2 Project Expansion
Q: What's happening with the CO2 portfolio?
A: Our Board approved $150 million in new CO2 floods, which will add an incremental 5,000 barrels per day at peak production [11]. -
Strength of Storage Market
Q: Is the storage market still a tailwind?
A: Yes, about 25% of our storage is at market-based rates [9]. We recently signed a three-year deal at a high watermark [9]. Contracts roll over approximately every three years, offering ongoing opportunities [9]. -
Impact of Commodity Prices on Guidance
Q: How are commodity prices affecting results?
A: Lower commodity prices have impacted gathering volumes [1]. However, strong performance in our transmission assets has offset some of the downside [1]. -
Business Separation Consideration
Q: Any thoughts on splitting the products and gas businesses?
A: We believe owning these businesses together is strategic due to shared benefits [5]. There would be dis-synergies and no significant incentive to break up the company now [5].