KI
KENNAMETAL INC (KMT)·Q4 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q4 2025 revenue was $516.45M, down 5% YoY; adjusted EPS was $0.34, both below S&P Global consensus ($527.56M revenue, $0.39 EPS). Weak volumes, tariff headwinds (~$4M), and restructuring/divestiture charges weighed on margins; adjusted operating margin fell to 7.4% from 11.5% YoY .*
- FY26 guidance introduced: sales $1.95–$2.05B; adjusted EPS $0.90–$1.30; FOCF ~120% of adjusted net income; capex ~$90M. Q1 FY26 sales guide $465–$485M; adjusted EPS $0.20–$0.30 .
- Cost actions accelerated: run-rate pre-tax savings achieved reached ~$65M by 6/30/25, with target lifted to $125M by June 2027 (exceeding prior $100M Investor Day goal). Footprint consolidation expanded (Greenfield, MA closure; Barcelona consolidation; Goshen, IN divestiture) .
- Strategic wins provide medium-term offsets: multi-year $25M U.S. Defense award; wins supporting AI data center power generation; management expects aerospace & defense to grow low double digits in FY26 .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
What Went Well
- Secured notable orders and share gains: “Infrastructure team secured a $25 million multi-year award with a U.S. Defense customer… wins in power generation supporting AI data centers” .
- Structural cost progress: achieved ~$65M run-rate savings since FY24; incremental $6M restructuring savings in Q4; annualized run-rate for January actions raised to ~$35M vs original $15M .
- Pricing and IRA credit/tornado benefits provided partial offsets: Q4 included price/mix and a net $7M tornado-related benefit in Infrastructure; FY25 saw ~$13M IRA advanced manufacturing production credit and $12M net tornado-related benefit .
What Went Wrong
- Volumes and margins compressed: Q4 sales down 5% YoY to $516.45M; reported operating margin fell to 6.1%, adjusted to 7.4% vs 11.5% YoY .
- Tariffs, inflation, and divestiture loss: net tariff effect ~-$4M, higher wages/raw materials, and ~$2M loss from Goshen divestiture pressured operating income .
- End-market softness and supply chain disruptions: broad-based weakness across regions/end-markets; temporary aerospace/defense supply-chain disruption; lower rig counts in the Americas; mining pressure in earthworks .
Financial Results
Headline Metrics: Sequential Trend (oldest → newest)
Year-over-Year Comparison (Q4 2024 → Q4 2025)
Segment Breakdown (Q4 2025 vs Q4 2024)
Geographic Sales (Q4 2025 vs Q4 2024)
KPIs
Guidance Changes
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- “We successfully executed tariff mitigation actions… rerouted internal supply chain… implemented surcharges… committed to fully offsetting the impact moving forward.”
- “We have achieved run rate savings of approximately $65,000,000… expect approximately $90,000,000 by the end of fiscal 2026.”
- “Capacity optimization remains one of our top priorities… complete this in two phases… updated cost savings of $125,000,000 exceeding our original target.”
- CFO: “Adjusted EBITDA margin was 14.8% versus 17.7% in the prior year quarter… decline primarily from lower volumes and unfavorable tariffs net of surcharges.”
- CFO: “We continue to maintain a healthy balance sheet and debt maturity profile with $840,000,000 of cash and revolver availability at quarter end.”
Q&A Highlights
- Outlook cadence and tariffs: Q1 sequential seasonality expected with pricing/FX tailwinds; tariff surcharges/ops coverage in place though margin compression persists near term .
- Structural actions differentiation: CEO emphasized footprint/organizational/material sourcing changes are “sustainable,” with margins improving when volumes recover .
- Tungsten pass-through: CFO expects tungsten price pass-through to lift Infrastructure margins early, with neutrality achieved by late Q3 to Q4 FY26 based on current trends .
- Portfolio optimization: CEO reiterated ongoing evaluation and actions to improve mix and performance, with more to come; sees share gains in aerospace/defense .
- End-market color: Energy expected flat despite lower rig counts due to higher material content in O&G tools; aerospace/defense improving as OEM production/supply chain normalize .
Estimates Context
Values retrieved from S&P Global.*
Implications:
- Q4 misses on revenue and adjusted EPS; Q3 significantly beat EPS on IRA credit and operational benefits; Q2 slightly below estimates. Expect analysts to lower near-term margin assumptions (tariff/raw materials) while monitoring FY26 pricing/tariff surcharge realization and cost-savings ramp .
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Near-term headwinds drove a Q4 miss vs consensus; tariff costs (~$4M), lower volumes, and restructuring/divestiture impacts compressed margins; watch the cadence of FY26 price/tariff surcharge realization .*
- Structural program expanded: savings target increased to $125M by FY27; footprint consolidations (6 total across phases) should structurally lower cost base and support margin recovery when volumes rebound .
- End-market mix improving: aerospace & defense expected low double-digit growth; strategic wins (including $25M defense award and AI data center-related power generation) provide secular offsets to cyclicals .
- Tungsten inflation manageable: management expects pass-through to neutralize margin impact by late FY26; short-term infrastructure margin lift possible as pricing flows through .
- Cash returns intact: quarterly dividend maintained at $0.20 and ongoing buybacks ($5M in Q4); FOCF discipline continues with FY26 FOCF ~120% of adjusted net income .
- FY26 guide is balanced amid macro uncertainty: sales $1.95–$2.05B and adjusted EPS $0.90–$1.30; monitor volumes in transportation/earthworks and FX tailwinds, plus IRA/tornado one-time lap in FY25 that creates EPS headwinds in FY26 .
- Trading lens: stock likely reacts to narrative around tariff coverage, tungsten pass-through, and visibility into aerospace/defense demand. Any evidence of sequential order stabilization or accelerated cost-savings realization would be a positive catalyst .