Sign in

    L3Harris Technologies Inc (LHX)

    Q4 2024 Earnings Summary

    Reported on Jan 1, 1970 (Before Market Open)
    Pre-Earnings Price$211.95Last close (Jan 29, 2025)
    Post-Earnings Price$207.40Open (Jan 30, 2025)
    Price Change
    $-4.55(-2.15%)
    TopicPrevious MentionsCurrent PeriodTrend

    LHX NeXt cost savings and margin expansion initiative

    Q3: On track for $600M by year-end, targeting $1B a year early. Q2: Ahead of schedule toward $1B in cost savings by 2026. Q1: Exceeded $400M run-rate, aiding an 80 bps margin increase.

    Achieved $800M in 2024, target raised to $1.2B by end of 2025, driving ~40% flow-through to margins. Contributed to higher segment operating margins in Q4.

    Consistently mentioned; showing strong execution and increased savings targets.

    Communication Systems growth

    Q3: 10% revenue increase, notable $400M NATO radio contracts. Q2: Record backlog over $6B, focus on 100,000+ radio opportunities in Europe. Q1: Large Taiwan award ($150M) displacing incumbent.

    Q4 revenue up 5% at $1.4B, margins at 24.4%, driven by software-defined radios and strong DoD demand; slightly compressed by mix of U.S. vs. international deliveries.

    Consistently mentioned; remains a key growth driver with some near-term margin fluctuations.

    Space segment opportunities

    Q3: Budget pressures tempered near-term outlook, but mission shift from air to space seen by 2026. Q2: Continued investment in SDA Tranche programs, focus on classified and merchant-supplier roles. Q1: 60 satellites awarded since merger, strong SDA presence.

    Q4 faced budget constraints but expects resumed growth by 2026; record backlog includes 40+ satellites, with successful SDA tranche contracts.

    Consistently mentioned; now tempered by budgets and fixed-price risk but seen as a long-term growth area.

    Aerojet Rocketdyne integration

    Q3: $600M in revenue, improved supply chain, emphasis on Glide Phase Interceptor. Q2: $600M revenue, 12.9% margins, working on capacity expansion. Q1: Integration ongoing, streamlining processes, 20% reduction in late deliveries.

    Q4: +5% revenue growth, 11.5% margin, expanding solid rocket motor production, key next-gen interceptor programs. Double-digit growth forecast for 2025.

    Consistently mentioned; optimism continues but legacy contracts & capacity remain challenges.

    Focus on free cash flow

    Q3: Over $700M FCF in the quarter, supporting ongoing investment. Q2: $714M FCF, reaffirmed $2.2B guidance. Q1: Affirmed $2.2B for 2024, focusing on debt reduction before share repurchases.

    Q4 FCF at $2.3B, up 14%, projecting $2.4–2.5B in 2025 and $2.8B by 2026. Emphasizes operational efficiency and working capital discipline.

    Consistently mentioned; steady improvement driven by margins and working capital.

    International demand

    Q3: $10B international pipeline in CS, NATO modernization leads. Q2: >$10B international radio pipeline, strong NATO/Europe demand. Q1: Highlighted wins in Taiwan and robust foreign aid budgets.

    Q4: Approx. 21–22% of total revenue, strong interest in radios, NVGs, munitions, and Indo-Pacific opportunities.

    Consistently mentioned; remains a key growth engine with steady orders from allies.

    Establishment of a new Business Review Committee

    Q3: No mention [No references found]. Q2: Ad hoc committee completed review; dissolved, recommendations being implemented. Q1: Temporary Business Review Committee created, focusing on program/bidding processes.

    No mention in Q4 [No references found].

    Topic no longer mentioned post-Q2; committee’s work ended.

    Airborne Combat Systems business shift from air to space

    Q3: No mention [No references found]. Q2: Still recognized headwinds as missions transition to space. Q1: Not directly discussed, but emphasis on expanding space solutions.

    No mention in Q4 [No references found].

    Topic no longer mentioned; overshadowed by broader space focus.

    IMS identified as the company’s longest-cycle business

    Q3: No mention [No references found]. Q2: Discussed IMS margin improvements but not as “longest-cycle”. Q1: Labeled as longest-cycle; slow to turn around programs.

    No mention in Q4 [No references found].

    Topic no longer mentioned; IMS references focus on margins only.

    Accelerated 2026 growth (space, F-35, ISR, motors)

    Q3: Growth in 2026 expected from capacity expansions, next-gen propulsion, and SAS improvements. Q2 & Q1: No direct mention of “accelerated 2026,” but references to long-term growth in space, Aerojet, and F-35.

    Q4: Highlighted accelerated 2026 growth from space recovery, F-35 TR-3 ramp, ISR demand, and rocket motor programs.

    Newer explicit focus starting Q3/Q4; foresees multifactor acceleration by 2026.

    Negative adjustments in classified space development

    Q3: Classified programs faced margin pressures, but no direct dollar figure. Q2: Mention of classified growth, no negative EAC reference. Q1: No mention [No references].

    Q4: About $100M in negative EACs on late-stage classified space contracts; expected resolution by 2025–2026.

    Newer concern in Q4; signals cost & schedule risks in advanced space programs.

    Margin compression in Communications Systems

    Q3: Not mentioned as compression; margins were 26%. Q2: Margins down slightly year-over-year on DoD vs. software mixes. Q1: No direct mention of inflation-driven margin squeeze.

    Q4: 24.4% margin, slightly compressed by U.S. vs. international mix and supply chain inflation, but expected to remain high 24% in 2025.

    Shift in sentiment in Q4 about near-term margin pressure, though still relatively strong.

    Space budget constraints anticipated in 2025

    Q3: Budget pressures noted in near term, but growth forecast by 2026. Q2: No specific 2025 constraint mention. Q1: No mention of 2025 constraints [No references].

    Q4: Cited budget constraints likely to affect 2025, with growth resuming in 2026.

    Emerging topic in Q3/Q4; near-term headwind but optimistic recovery by 2026.