Timothy M. Archer
About Timothy M. Archer
Timothy M. Archer (age 58) is President and CEO of Lam Research, serving as CEO since December 5, 2018 and as a director since 2018. He holds a B.S. in Applied Physics from Caltech and completed Harvard’s Program for Management Development; prior roles include COO at Lam and senior leadership at Novellus and Tektronix . Under Archer, Lam reported CY2024 revenue of approximately $16.2B (+13% YoY), operating cash flow of ~$4.6B (~28% of revenue), and paid ~$1.1B in dividends; in 1H CY2025, revenue totaled ~$9.9B with ~$3.9B operating cash flow . The 2022–2024 PRSU cycle paid out at 56.94% of target, reflecting Lam’s TSR underperformance versus the XSOX index, signaling outcome sensitivity to relative returns .
Past Roles
| Organization | Role | Years | Strategic Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lam Research | President & CEO; President & COO; EVP & COO | CEO since 2018; various since 2012 | Led growth, margin focus, and capital returns; executed multi-year incentive alignment |
| Novellus Systems | COO; EVP Worldwide Sales/Marketing/Customer Satisfaction; EVP PECVD & Electrofill; Technology leadership in Japan and Electrofill BU | 1994–2012 (selected roles 2008–2012) | Technology and commercial leadership in deposition; customer alignment and go-to-market |
| Tektronix | Process Development Engineer | 1989–1994 (early career) | High-speed bipolar IC process development; foundational engineering credentials |
External Roles
| Organization | Role | Years | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Johnson Controls International plc | Director; Compensation & Talent Development Committee | Since Mar 2024 | Current public company board service |
| SEMI (industry association) | International Board of Directors | Current | Industry ecosystem engagement |
| National GEM Consortium | Chair of the Board | 2020–2022 | STEM diversity leadership |
Fixed Compensation
| Component | 2025 | 2024 | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base Salary ($) | 1,300,000 | 1,200,000 | 2025 increase effective Feb 17, 2025 |
| Target Annual Bonus (% of Salary) | 200% | 200% | Unchanged YoY; max 2.5x target |
| Target Annual Bonus ($) | 2,600,000 | 2,400,000 | Based on base salary at plan set date |
Performance Compensation
- Annual Incentive (AIP) design (CY2024 and CY2025): equal-weighted between Corporate Performance Factor (non-GAAP operating margin), Profitability Performance Factor (non-GAAP gross margin), and Individual Performance Factor; max funding 250% of target .
- CY2024 AIP results for Archer: Corporate 1.06; Profitability 1.10; Individual 1.05; payout $2,938,320 on $2.4M target .
| AIP Metric (CY2024) | Weight | Target Setup | Actual Result | Payout Mechanics |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Corporate: non-GAAP operating margin | 1/3 | Stretch above AOP; accelerated slope between AOP and 1.0 PF for 2024 | 1.06 | Applied multiplicatively |
| Profitability: non-GAAP gross margin | 1/3 | Stretch above AOP; accelerated slope between AOP and 1.0 PF for 2024 | 1.10 | Applied multiplicatively |
| Individual Performance Factor | 1/3 | CEO set to avg of other NEOs | 1.05 | Applied multiplicatively |
- Long-Term Incentive Program (LTIP) shift in 2025: eliminated stock options; 60% market-based PRSUs (relative TSR to XSOX, 0–150% payout with 100% cap if absolute TSR negative), 40% service RSUs; 3-year PRSU cliff vest; RSUs vest 1/3 annually .
- CEO 2025/2027 LTIP target: $24.1M; granted 177,750 target PRSUs and 118,500 RSUs (grant date Feb 28, 2025; RSUs vest annually over 3 years; PRSUs vest at end of period) .
- 2022/2024 PRSU payout: 56.94% of target; Archer received 86,548 shares vs 152,000 target .
| LTIP Cycle | Vehicle | Performance Measure | Target Award/Grant | Vesting | Outcome (if applicable) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025–2027 | Market PRSUs | Relative TSR vs XSOX (percentile rank; 0–150%; 100% cap if negative TSR) | 177,750 target shares | Cliff vest after 3 years | In flight |
| 2025–2027 | Service RSUs | Service | 118,500 shares | 1/3 on 1st/2nd/3rd anniversary | In flight |
| 2022–2024 | Market PRSUs | TSR vs XSOX (diff approach vs index return) | 152,000 target shares | Cliff vested | Paid 86,548 (56.94% of target) |
Equity Ownership & Alignment
- Beneficial ownership: 1,481,175 Lam shares; “less than 1%” of outstanding (1,261,032,300 shares at 9/5/2025) . Within 60 days of 9/5/2025, 616,410 options were exercisable for Archer (included in beneficial ownership footnote) .
- Hedging and pledging: prohibited by policy (with limited diversified exchange fund exception); reinforced in governance highlights .
- Executive stock ownership guideline: CEO 6x base salary; NEOs in compliance or have time remaining per guidelines .
- Clawback policy (2023): mandatory recoupment of excess incentive-based comp for restatements (3-year lookback), regardless of fault; supersedes prior clawback for post-10/2/2023 compensation .
| Ownership/Equity Detail | Amount | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Shares Beneficially Owned (#) | 1,481,175 | Less than 1% of class |
| Options Exercisable within 60 days (#) | 616,410 | As of 9/5/2025 |
| Unvested Service RSUs outstanding (#) | 118,500 (2025 grant); 32,720 (2024 grant); 20,120 (2023 grant) | Standard 1/3 annual vesting |
| Target Market PRSUs outstanding (#) | 177,750 (2025 grant); 147,260 (2024 grant); 181,020 (2023 grant) | 3-year cliff vest; 0–150% payout framework |
| Options outstanding (exercisable/unexercisable) | 49,080/98,160 @ $98.15 exp 3/1/2031; 120,680/60,340 @ $49.09 exp 3/1/2030; 151,980/— @ $54.06 exp 3/1/2029; 59,970/— @ $59.88 exp 3/1/2028; 121,400/— @ $30.03 exp 3/2/2027; 113,300/— @ $17.68 exp 3/1/2026 | Next near-term options: 2026–2031 expirations |
Vesting cadence and potential selling pressure:
- Near-term supply stems from annual RSU tranches (e.g., 118,500 2025 RSUs vest 1/3 each on 2/28/2026, 2027, 2028; 32,720 2024 RSUs vest on 3/1 annually through 2027). Form 4 activity will ultimately dictate realized sales, but structural cadence indicates periodic vesting-driven liquidity windows .
Employment Terms
- Executive severance policy (non-CIC involuntary termination): CEO cash severance equals 150% of base salary plus 100% of five-year average annual incentive, plus pro-rata current-year incentive; pro-rata vesting of service RSUs/options and cash value for pro-rata PRSUs per terms . Potential payout illustration (as of 6/29/2025): Not for Cause total $32,497,021; components include severance $1,950,000; five-year average AIP $2,649,758; pro-rata AIP $1,083,333; equity vesting and PRSU cash components; retiree health benefit $810,000 .
- Change-in-control (double-trigger) or Acquisition: CEO multiple increases to 200% of base salary and 200% of five-year AIP average, plus pro-rata AIP; accelerated vesting for service-based equity and cash conversion for performance awards as specified; medical benefits apply . Potential payout illustration (as of 6/29/2025): CIC/Acquisition total $79,775,573; includes severance $2,600,000; five-year average AIP $5,299,516; pro-rata AIP $1,104,066; equity vesting/cash conversion and health benefit $810,000 .
- Non-solicit: six months post-termination as a condition to benefits; compliance with confidentiality/non-compete obligations required; clawback applies to compensation .
- Senior Executive Transition Policy: eligibility at 55+ with service criteria; reduced schedule pre-retirement with restrictions (no competition/solicitation during transition) .
- Deferred Compensation: CEO FY2025 contributions $866,318; balance $15,036,657; change-in-control accelerates distribution timing per plan .
Board Governance
- Role and independence: Archer is a non-independent director (current President & CEO); Lam maintains a separate, independent Board Chair (Abhijit Y. Talwalkar); no lead independent director is designated given independent chair structure .
- Committees: Archer does not serve on Board committees; committee independence maintained for Audit, Compensation and Human Resources, and Nominating and Governance .
- Meeting attendance: All directors, including Archer, attended at least 75% of meetings; all 11 nominees met the ≥75% threshold .
- Hedging/pledging prohibited; independent executive sessions; robust risk oversight and ERM cadence .
Board service history and dual-role implications:
- Director since 2018; currently CEO and director; independent chair and separate roles mitigate CEO/Chair concentration risk and enhance board independence; CEO does not receive additional director pay .
Director Compensation (as applicable to Archer)
- Archer receives no additional compensation for service as a director; his compensation is set by independent directors under the executive program .
Compensation Structure Analysis
- Mix and design: For 2025, Lam increased certainty by removing options and shifting to RSUs + PRSUs (60/40 for CEO), improving resilience amid stock volatility and aligning with peer practices; relative TSR now measured via percentile rank vs XSOX constituents, and negative absolute TSR caps payouts at 100% of target .
- AIP calibration: 2024 included accelerated scaling between AOP and target to emphasize profitability execution; reverted to linear in 2025 to simplify .
- Pay-for-performance: 2022/2024 PRSU payout at 56.94% demonstrates downside sensitivity when TSR trails peers; say-on-pay support >90% in 2021–2024 with engagement informing the 2025 negative TSR cap .
Compensation Peer Group and Say-on-Pay
- Peer group (2025): semiconductor/equipment and tech hardware names (e.g., AMAT, KLA, NVIDIA, AMD, Intel, Texas Instruments, Micron, Broadcom; plus select hardware/software) with revenue and market cap bands at ~0.33–3x Lam .
- Positioning: Lam does not target a single percentile for NEO pay; design balances competitiveness and stretch performance goals .
- Say-on-pay: >90% approval 2021–2024; 2025 LTIP changes (negative TSR cap) aligned with investor feedback .
Related Party Transactions and Red Flags
- Related party transactions: none requiring disclosure in FY2025; no family relationships among directors/executives .
- Tax gross-ups: none for perquisites or CIC; relocation gross-up available broadly to employees (not executive-specific) .
- Repricing of options: prohibited without shareholder approval .
- Hedging/pledging: prohibited (alignment positive) .
- Clawback: robust, regardless of fault for restatement-triggered recoupment .
Performance & Track Record
| Metric | Details | Period |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | ~$16.2B (+~13% YoY) | CY2024 |
| Operating Cash Flow | ~$4.6B (~28% of revenue) | CY2024 |
| Dividends Paid | ~$1.1B | CY2024 |
| Revenue | ~$9.9B combined | Q1–Q2 CY2025 |
| 2022/2024 PRSU Payout | 56.94% of target (CEO: 86,548 shares) | 3-year cycle ending Jan 31, 2025 |
Note: All share counts reflect Lam’s 10-for-1 stock split effective October 2, 2024 .
Equity Ownership Guidelines and Pledging
- CEO guideline: 6x base salary; NEOs in compliance or have time remaining; hedging/pledging prohibited by policy .
Board Service Summary (Archer)
| Attribute | Status |
|---|---|
| Independence | Not independent (CEO) |
| Board Chair | Separate and independent (Talwalkar) |
| Committees | None listed for Archer |
| Attendance | ≥75% threshold met; all nominees met threshold |
| Other Public Boards | Johnson Controls (Comp & Talent Dev Committee) |
Investment Implications
- Alignment and incentives: High at-risk mix with rigorous AIP profitability metrics and relative TSR-based PRSUs; 2022–2024 PRSU payout at 56.94% underscores downside sensitivity, while 2025 negative TSR cap prevents windfalls in down markets .
- Retention and overhang: Large outstanding RSU/PRSU grants (e.g., 118,500 2025 RSUs; 177,750 2025 PRSU target) indicate meaningful vesting cadence over 2026–2028 and potential episodic supply; policy prohibiting hedging/pledging and robust ownership guidelines support alignment .
- Governance risk: Dual role (CEO + director) mitigated by separate, independent chair and fully independent key committees; strong say-on-pay history reduces compensation controversy risk .
- Downside protection vs upside leverage: Removal of options in 2025 shifts mix toward RSUs (lower risk) and PRSUs (performance-based), trading some upside torque for plan resilience amid sector volatility .
Best AI for Equity Research
Performance on expert-authored financial analysis tasks
Best AI for Equity Research
Performance on expert-authored financial analysis tasks