MO
Magnolia Oil & Gas Corp (MGY)·Q1 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q1 2025 delivered record production of 96.5 Mboe/d (+14% YoY) and strong profitability: operating income margin 39%, adjusted EBITDAX $248.4M, and free cash flow $110.5M .
- Magnolia raised 2025 total production growth guidance to 7–9% (from 5–7%) and cut D&C capital to $430–$470M (from $460–$490M), reflecting outperformance in Giddings and capital efficiencies; Q2 production guided ~97 Mboe/d and D&C ~$110M .
- Wall Street consensus: Revenue beat ($350.3M vs $342.5M*), while S&P Primary EPS showed a slight miss ($0.525* actual vs $0.534* est) despite company-reported diluted EPS of $0.54 . Values retrieved from S&P Global*.
- Capital returns remained robust: ~$81.7M (74% of FCF) via buybacks and dividends; 2.2M shares repurchased and $0.15 dividend declared (payable June 2, 2025) .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
What Went Well
- Record total production and stronger well performance: 96.5 Mboe/d, driven by Giddings (76.7 Mboe/d; +25% YoY) with shallower declines and quick paybacks .
- Capital efficiency and guidance upgrade: FY25 production growth raised to 7–9% with less capital ($430–$470M), maintaining discipline at ≤55% reinvestment rate .
- Management tone: “The strong start… improved capital efficiency allows us to raise guidance… while lowering capital spending” — Chris Stavros (CEO) .
What Went Wrong
- EPS vs S&P consensus: Primary EPS slightly missed ($0.525* vs $0.534*), likely reflecting S&P methodology differences versus company diluted EPS $0.54 . Values retrieved from S&P Global*.
- Cash balance declined to $247.6M from $260.0M sequentially, reflecting active capital program and returns; net debt rose to ~$152M (cash $248M vs $400M notes) .
- GP&T costs increased alongside higher gas prices; management noted GP&T generally moves with gas price directionality (contango) .
Financial Results
Consensus vs actual (Q1 2025):
Values retrieved from S&P Global*.
Segment breakdown (production volumes):
KPIs
Guidance Changes
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- “The strong start to this year… allows us to raise our guidance for 2025 year-over-year production growth to a range of 7 to 9 percent… At the same time, we are lowering… capital spending to $430 to $470 million” — Chris Stavros, CEO .
- “We made a tactical decision to bring a couple of multi-well pads online in the first quarter that are in a gassier portion of Giddings… The wells not only exceeded our performance expectations but are also exhibiting a shallower decline profile” — CEO .
- “Operating income margin for the first quarter was $15.63 per BOE or 39% of our total revenue… highlighting our success reducing our lease operating expenses last year” — CFO Brian Corales .
Q&A Highlights
- Giddings well performance and area characterization: management cited ~a dozen wells in a newer area with strong oil rates (~500 bbl/d average per well), shallower declines, and high single-digit F&D per barrel .
- Sustaining capital/outlook: completion deferrals (~half a dozen) create flexibility; capex range $430–$470M seen as sufficient given efficiencies and potential softening OFS pricing .
- Capital allocation between gas/oil windows: returns robust across streams; oil expected to grow low single digits, balanced development across 200k-acre development area .
- Service costs: pricing roughly flat QoQ; minor OCTG increases tied to steel tariffs offset by diesel relief; potential softness in back half if commodities stay subdued .
- GP&T cost trend: generally moves with gas price directionality (e.g., higher with rising gas) .
- Oil mix: oil cut expected roughly stable around ~40–41% through 2025, with slight absolute oil growth .
Estimates Context
- Revenue beat: $350.3M vs consensus $342.5M*; production outperformance (Giddings wells, better gas realizations) drove upside . Values retrieved from S&P Global*.
- EPS: S&P Primary EPS actual $0.525* vs $0.534* consensus (slight miss), while company-reported diluted EPS was $0.54 . Values retrieved from S&P Global*.
- Implication: Consensus likely nudges higher on production trajectory and margin durability, while EPS models should reconcile Primary vs diluted definitions and non-GAAP adjustments .
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Guidance upgrade with lower capex is a high-quality positive surprise: FY25 growth 7–9% with $430–$470M D&C; reinvestment ≤55% supports sustained FCF return program .
- Giddings continues to exceed expectations, with newer pads showing strong productivity and shallower declines—key driver of per-share value compounding and operating leverage .
- Cost discipline remains intact: operating income margin held at 39% despite lower oil prices; LOE per boe contained; diesel relief offsets minor OCTG tariff-related increases .
- Capital returns: 74% of FCF returned in Q1, $0.15 dividend payable June 2, and ongoing buybacks; remaining authorization 9.6M Class A shares .
- Near-term setup: Q2 production ~flat (~97 Mboe/d) as activity normalizes; watch GP&T trajectory if gas prices rise and any incremental deferrals to optimize returns .
- Risk/defense: Unhedged profile increases commodity sensitivity, but low leverage (net debt ~0.2x Q1 annualized EBITDAX) and liquidity ~$698M provide resilience .
- Modeling notes: Align EPS definitions (Primary vs diluted), incorporate tax guidance (effective ~21%; cash ~7–9%), and reflect area mix impacts on realizations and GP&T .
Bold = beat/miss definition used in Financial Results/Consensus tables.