Sign in

You're signed outSign in or to get full access.

Christopher Briggs

Chief Product Officer at MITEK SYSTEMSMITEK SYSTEMS
Executive

About Christopher Briggs

Christopher Briggs, age 55, served as Mitek’s Chief Product Officer from April 2022 until his resignation effective September 19, 2025 . He holds a BA from Rice University and an MBA from the University of Virginia, with prior product and strategy leadership roles at Airside, Equifax, and Experian, and academic/industry engagements as a professor at Seneca College and Thought Leader on the Forbes Technology Council . Company performance during FY2024 included revenue of $172.1 million, net income of $3.3 million, and cash from operations of $31.7 million, while executive performance equity emphasizes relative stock performance vs. the Russell 2000, aligning pay with TSR outcomes; the FY2025 plan further shifted cash incentives to a 50/50 mix of revenue and adjusted EBITDA .

Past Roles

OrganizationRoleYearsStrategic Impact
AirsideChief Product OfficerApr 2021 – Apr 2022Led product management in travel-focused identity verification
EquifaxHead of Product; Chief Marketing Officer; VP of StrategyJul 2015 – Oct 2020Senior product/strategy leadership in data, analytics, and technology
ExperianSenior Director; VP Product ManagementJan 2007 – May 2015Product management in multinational data analytics/credit reporting

External Roles

OrganizationRoleYears
Seneca CollegeProfessor (product management and marketing)Since May 2021
Forbes Technology CouncilThought LeaderSince May 2023
Industry RecognitionPress quote on AI-enabled fraud defenses (Digital Fraud Defender)2025 (Datos Insights award press release)

Fixed Compensation

YearBase Salary ($)Target Bonus (% of Salary)Actual Bonus Paid ($)
2023325,000 50% (CPO target “remained at 50%”) 128,156
2024335,000 (3.1% increase) 50% 103,850
2025335,000 (effective Jan 1, 2025) 50%

Performance Compensation

2024 Annual Cash Incentive (structure and outcome)

MetricWeightingTargetActualPayout (as % of Target)Vesting/Timing
Identity revenue70% total revenue component (primary/secondary mix possible) Board-approved operating plan 90% of target Contributed to 62% payout for Briggs Paid in Q4 2024
Deposits revenuePortion of 70% revenue component Board-approved operating plan 97% of target Contributed to 62% payout for Briggs Paid in Q4 2024
Non-GAAP operating margin30% Operating margin target per plan 80% of target Contributed to 62% payout for Briggs Paid in Q4 2024

Notes:

  • 2025 plan changed to 50% revenue and 50% adjusted EBITDA (director-level and above), max 200% of target, with Board discretion ±10% for CEO’s direct reports .

Equity Incentives (structure)

Award TypeGrant DateUnitsGrant Date Fair Value ($)Performance MetricVesting
RSU12/01/202328,635 Included in $758,403 total equity value N/A25% per year over 4 years; fully vests 12/01/2027
PSU (max case)12/01/202338,084 (max; target 33% lower) Included in $758,403 total equity value Relative stock performance vs. Russell 2000; over-achievement increases payout Equal annual tranches over 3 years; fully vests 12/01/2026 if criteria met
RSU11/30/202218,329 N/A25% per year over 4 years; fully vests 11/30/2026
PSU11/30/202216,292 Relative stock performance vs. Russell 2000 Equal annual tranches over 3 years; fully vests 11/30/2025 if criteria met
RSU05/16/202214,738 N/A25% per year over 4 years; fully vests 05/16/2026
2025 RSUApproved 12/08/202427,593N/AEqual annual installments over 4 years
2025 PSUApproved 12/08/202427,593Relative stock performance; 100% potential over-achievement (revised)Annual tranches over 3 years

Equity Ownership & Alignment

ItemDetail
Total beneficial ownership29,401 shares (as of Jan 17, 2025)
Shares outstanding (basis for % calc)45,231,214 (as of record date Jan 17, 2025)
Ownership as % of shares outstanding~0.065% (29,401 ÷ 45,231,214)
Unvested RSUs/PSUs (9/30/2024)RSU 14,738 (5/16/2022) ; RSU 18,329 (11/30/2022) ; PSU 16,292 (11/30/2022) ; RSU 28,635 (12/01/2023) ; PSU 28,635 (12/01/2023)
Hedging/pledgingProhibited by insider trading policy (no shorting, derivatives, margin accounts, or pledging)
Stock ownership guidelines (executives)Not disclosed; director guidelines exist (5x cash retainer)

Employment Terms

TermDetails
Role and datesChief Product Officer since April 2022; resigned effective September 19, 2025
Severance (no CoC)Lump sum equal to 50% of base salary, plus six months company health plan premiums; accrued but unpaid compensation
Change-of-control (double trigger)If terminated without Cause or resigns for Good Reason within 2 months pre- or 12 months post-CoC: 50% base salary; six months health premiums; 100% accelerated vesting of all outstanding equity awards
Definitions“Cause” and “Good Reason” defined (include breach, relocation >50 miles, material diminution; cure periods)
ClawbackNasdaq Rule 10D-1 compliant clawback adopted Oct 2, 2023; recovery of erroneously awarded incentive compensation upon required restatements
Non-compete / non-solicitNot disclosed

Compensation Structure Analysis

  • Mix and at-risk pay: Briggs’ cash incentive target remained at 50% of base (director-level and above); long-term equity balanced between RSUs (time-based) and PSUs (performance-based) with PSU metrics tied to relative stock performance vs. Russell 2000, indicating strong pay-for-performance linkage .
  • 2024 outcomes: Actual annual cash incentive payout of $103,850 (62% of target), reflecting below-target achievement on operating margin and varying revenue attainment across segments .
  • Program changes (2025): Company increased emphasis on adjusted EBITDA in cash incentives (50/50 revenue/adjusted EBITDA), and refined PSU over-achievement mechanics to strengthen performance alignment after a 64% say-on-pay support in 2024 .

Performance & Track Record

IndicatorDetail
Stock/TSR alignment in equityPSUs vest based on relative stock performance vs. Russell 2000; over-/under-performance adjusts vesting proportionally
2024 vesting activity (value realized)40,508 shares vested for Briggs, value realized $511,879 (includes shares tendered for taxes)
Company operating highlights (FY2024)Revenue $172.1m; Net income $3.3m; Cash from operations $31.7m
RecognitionIndustry award for AI-enabled fraud defenses; Briggs highlighted multilayered defense against deepfakes and injection attacks

Risk Indicators & Red Flags

  • Hedging/pledging banned; no pledging disclosed for Briggs (alignment positive) .
  • Clawback policy in place under Nasdaq Rule 10D-1 (governance positive) .
  • Internal control remediation ongoing (five material weaknesses remaining as of Jan 2025, with detailed remediation plan), a company-level risk backdrop for incentive metrics tied to financial reporting quality .
  • Resignation of Briggs effective Sept 19, 2025 introduces transition/continuity risk in product leadership; resignation noted as not due to disagreement with the company .

Compensation Peer Group and Shareholder Feedback

  • Peer group: 14 tech/application software and internet services companies used for benchmarking (e.g., A10 Networks, Agilysys, OneSpan, PROS Holdings, Model N, etc.) .
  • Say-on-pay: 64% approval in 2024; company engaged top holders and adjusted 2025 compensation design (greater at-risk for CEO, EBITDA emphasis, PSU mechanics) .

Investment Implications

  • Alignment: PSU design tied to relative TSR vs. Russell 2000 and prohibition of hedging/pledging support shareholder alignment; Briggs’ 2024 incentive outcome (62% of target) indicates disciplined payouts vs. performance .
  • Retention/transition: Briggs’ resignation in Sept 2025 elevates execution risk around product roadmap continuity; monitor succession and retention of key product talent .
  • Program quality: Post-2024 investor feedback drove meaningful improvements (50/50 revenue/adjusted EBITDA in cash incentives, refined PSU over-achievement), suggesting improving compensation governance and stronger performance linkage going forward .
  • Ownership signal: Briggs’ direct beneficial stake is modest (~0.065%); unvested RSUs/PSUs were substantial as of 9/30/2024, creating potential selling pressure upon scheduled vest dates—tempered by forfeiture risk tied to employment status and performance hurdles .