ON
OLD NATIONAL BANCORP /IN/ (ONB)·Q1 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q1 2025 delivered GAAP diluted EPS of $0.44 and adjusted EPS of $0.45; ONB beat S&P Global EPS consensus of ~$0.426 (9 estimates) by ~$0.02, while S&P revenue “actual” ($446.6M) came in below consensus ($478.1M, 7 estimates). Bold EPS beat; revenue miss likely reflects differing revenue definitions across sources *.
- Net interest income (FTE) was $393.0M and NIM (FTE) dipped 3 bps to 3.27% due to lower accretion and fewer days; deposit costs fell 17 bps to 1.91%, underscoring successful deposit pricing execution .
- Credit remained resilient: provision rose to $31.4M; NCOs were 24 bps of average loans (21 bps ex‑PCD), NPLs 1.29% of loans, and ACL/EOP loans rose to 1.16% (incl. unfunded) .
- Bremer partnership expected to close May 1 (two months earlier than original Jul 1 assumption), creating NII upside optionality if ONB retains more CRE loans (management quantified ~$34.6M NII, ~$0.09–$0.10 EPS uplift hypothetically for $2.4B retained) and guiding NII/NIM growth in 2025; management expects FY EPS in line with consensus and positive operating leverage .
- Capital is strong (Tier 1 CET1 11.62%); TCE/TA improved to 7.76%. Board authorized a $200M buyback program (effective through Feb 28, 2026) and maintained a $0.14 quarterly dividend; buybacks are a back-half 2025/2026 consideration after Bremer marks are finalized .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
-
What Went Well
- “Better-than-expected first-quarter results” driven by peer-leading deposits, solid loan growth, disciplined expenses; tangible book up meaningfully y/y and q/q .
- Deposit costs fell 17 bps; core deposits grew 1.7% annualized; NIM would have been +6 bps absent lower accretion and fewer days, demonstrating deposit strategy efficacy .
- Earlier Bremer close (May 1) enhances balance-sheet flexibility and 2025 NII/NIM trajectory; management confident NII/NIM will grow in 2025 .
-
What Went Wrong
- NIM (FTE) down 3 bps to 3.27% and NII lower q/q due to reduced accretion and fewer days; noninterest income declined 2% on seasonally lower bank fees/COLI .
- Credit costs higher: provision rose to $31.4M (from $27.0M), NCOs 24 bps (up from 21 bps), and NPLs increased modestly to 1.29% of loans .
- S&P revenue “actual” ($446.6M) missed consensus ($478.1M), implying a top-line shortfall against external models despite strong PPNR and efficiency improvements *.
Financial Results
Estimates vs. Actuals (S&P Global)
Values retrieved from S&P Global.*
Credit & Funding KPIs
Noninterest Income Breakdown ($USD Millions)
Guidance Changes
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- “Old National reported better-than-expected first-quarter results driven by our peer-leading deposit franchise, solid loan growth and disciplined expense management.” – Jim Ryan, Chairman & CEO .
- “Away from accretion and days net interest margin would have been up 6 basis points with lower deposit costs more than offsetting rate and volume dynamics on the asset side.” – John Moran, CFO .
- “We expect full year results that yield earnings per share in line with current analyst consensus estimates…positive operating leverage and a peer-leading return profile.” – John Moran, CFO .
- “We have received all necessary regulatory approvals and anticipate a legal close date of May 1 [for Bremer].” – Jim Ryan, Chairman & CEO .
Q&A Highlights
- Bremer CRE loan sale optionality: If ONB retains the $2.4B CRE instead of selling, management acknowledged potential ~$34.6M NII and ~$0.09–$0.10 EPS uplift hypothetically; final decision to balance CET1, total capital, and CRE as % of RWA .
- Deposit betas and pricing: Core ONB down beta targeted ~40% by Q2; exception-priced deposit book continues to be repriced down granularly; brokered kept short to capture declines .
- Loan growth cadence: Pipeline up 30% y/y and accepted up 50% support mid-single-digit growth; CRE pull-through slower amid competition .
- Capital allocation: Buyback considered later (after marks); immediate priority is optimizing balance sheet size and capital stack; stronger starting capital provides optionality .
- Reserves and macro: Qualitative reserves ~25% of ACL; provision guide maintained despite uncertain global trade/macro; credit metrics in line with expectations .
Estimates Context
- EPS: ONB’s adjusted EPS $0.45 exceeded S&P Global consensus of ~$0.426 (9 estimates), a positive surprise reflecting lower deposit costs and disciplined expenses. Company GAAP EPS was $0.44 *.
- Revenue: S&P Global “Revenue” actual of $446.6M missed consensus of $478.1M (7 estimates), while company-reported total revenue (FTE) was $486.8M. The discrepancy likely reflects differing revenue definitions (e.g., FTE adjustments and categorization) in external models versus company reporting *.
- Forward: Management reiterated FY EPS in line with consensus and NII/NIM growth in 2025 given earlier Bremer close and repricing; if fewer CRE loans are sold day 1, NII/EPS could see upside versus the original M&A model .
Values retrieved from S&P Global.*
Key Takeaways for Investors
- ONB delivered an EPS beat versus consensus; revenue miss versus S&P’s construct was offset by strong PPNR and improved efficiency, suggesting upside leverage to deposit cost execution and repricing in 2025 *.
- Deposit costs have turned decisively lower (1.91%) and are likely to fall further as exception-priced deposits reprice; this should support NIM expansion absent accretion headwinds .
- Earlier Bremer close (May 1) provides near-term NII lift and optionality on CRE loan retention; legal day‑1 capital stronger than modeled, creating balance sheet flexibility for growth .
- Credit normalization continues but remains manageable (NCOs 24 bps; NPLs 1.29%; ACL/EOP loans 1.16%); qualitative overlays account for macro/trade uncertainty, containing downside risk .
- Capital is robust (Tier 1 CET1 11.62%, TCE/TA 7.76%); dividend held at $0.14; $200M buyback authorized but likely paced behind growth/marks—monitor for back-half activation .
- Management expects FY EPS in line with consensus and positive operating leverage; watch Q2 update for final Bremer marks and any change in CRE sale sizing/NII guide .
- Near-term trading catalysts: confirmation of Bremer close and integration progress, deposit cost trajectory, Q2 NII/NIM cadence update, and any signals on CRE loan sale sizing or buyback timing .
Footnotes:
- All company figures and quotes cited from ONB Q1 2025 press release and 8‑K, Q1 2025 earnings call, Q4 2024 materials, and dividend/buyback releases .
- S&P Global estimates and actuals included with explicit notation; definitions may differ from company “total revenue (FTE)” constructs.*