ON
OLD NATIONAL BANCORP /IN/ (ONB)·Q2 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Adjusted EPS of $0.53 beat S&P consensus by ~$0.01 (2.3%), while GAAP EPS was $0.34 given Day 1 CECL, merger charges, and a pension gain; S&P “revenue” missed by ~14% due to the CECL provision flowing through vendor methodology . Q2 “Primary EPS” actual 0.53 vs 0.518 consensus; “Revenue” actual $534.7M vs $624.3M consensus (S&P Global)*.
- Operating momentum was strong: NIM (FTE) expanded 26 bps to 3.53%, total revenue (FTE) rose to $654.4M, fee income strengthened, and deposits/loans expanded with Bremer; efficiency improved on an adjusted basis .
- Guidance: management raised 2025 NII and fee income guidance; expects 4–6% full‑year organic loan growth ex‑Bremer (lower end), and reiterated a neutral rate stance with two 25 bp cuts in the base case .
- Catalysts: (1) sustained NIM expansion and deposit cost discipline, (2) Bremer integration/on-time October system conversion, (3) potential capital return discussion post-conversion (buybacks “on the horizon”), and (4) credit normalization staying benign vs peers .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
-
What Went Well
- Margin/earning asset growth: NIM (FTE) rose to 3.53% (+26 bps q/q) on Bremer, organic loan growth, and securities repositioning; NII (FTE) reached $521.9M . “We expect NII and NIM will continue to grow in the second half of 2025” (CFO) .
- Fee momentum: Noninterest income was $132.5M ($111.6M ex pension gain), with strength in wealth, mortgage, and capital markets; adjusted PPNR improved to $289.9M .
- Deposit franchise: Deposits rose to $54.4B (core +$11.6B including Bremer); total deposit costs held at 1.93% (+2 bps); loan/deposit ratio improved to 88% .
- Quote: “Old National’s impressive second quarter results were achieved through… Growing our balance sheet, expanding our fee-based businesses, and controlling expenses.” – CEO Jim Ryan .
-
What Went Wrong
- Reported “revenue” miss vs S&P: Vendor “revenue” fell short (CECL Day 1 $75.6M reduces S&P’s revenue construct), yielding a headline miss despite strong FTE revenue and PPNR growth (S&P values)*.
- Elevated provision and integration costs: Provision rose to $106.8M (incl. $75.6M CECL Day 1); merger-related charges were $41.2M, partially offset by a $21.0M pension gain .
- Competitive loan market: Management’s organic loan growth bias to the lower end of 4–6% reflects heightened CRE competition and disciplined pricing/structure .
Financial Results
Headline trend vs prior quarters
Estimate comparison (S&P Global)
Values retrieved from S&P Global.
Note: ONB’s reported total revenue (FTE) was $654.37M (NII FTE $521.85M + noninterest income $132.52M); S&P’s “revenue” methodology for banks aligns more closely with “net interest income after provision + noninterest income,” which was ~$540.47M in Q2, explaining the apparent miss given the $75.6M Day 1 CECL impact .
Year-over-year snapshot
KPIs and balance sheet quality
Notes:
- Notable items in Q2: $75.6M Day 1 CECL (non‑PCD), $41.2M merger charges, $21.0M pension gain .
- Adjusted PPNR improved to $289.9M; adjusted efficiency to 50.2% .
Guidance Changes
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- CEO: “Old National’s impressive second quarter results were achieved through… Growing our balance sheet, expanding our fee-based businesses, and controlling expenses… with the successful closing of our partnership with Bremer on May 1, 2025.”
- CFO: “Adjusted EPS were $0.53… Results were driven by additional two months of Bremer, organic growth in loans and deposits, margin expansion, growth in fee income, and well-controlled expenses.”
- CFO on NIM/NII trajectory: “Repricing dynamics… combined with loan growth and the Bremer partnership, support our expectation that NII and NIM will continue to grow in the second half of 2025.”
- CEO on capital return: “We are interested in building a little bit of capital… buyback is on the horizon… focusing on conversion and a strong start for next year.”
Q&A Highlights
- Loan growth outlook: Heightened CRE competition; disciplined pricing/structure leads to lower‑end 4–6% organic growth bias; strong C&I pipeline .
- Deposit costs and mix: Spot total deposit cost 1.93%; noninterest-bearing ~25% of core (up ~2 pts q/q); brokered ~6% of deposits—below peers .
- Time deposit/brokered repricing: ~$5.5B TDs roll in Q3, ~$3B in Q4; ~$2.4B brokered next 90 days at mid‑4s offers downward repricing opportunity .
- Capital and buybacks: CET1 ~50 bps better than expected post‑Bremer; evaluating buybacks post‑conversion .
- Deal model EPS: 2026 EPS tracking at “$2.60+” with retained $2.4B CRE offsetting lower rate/credit marks .
Estimates Context
- Q2 2025 vs S&P consensus: Adjusted/Primary EPS $0.53 vs $0.518 (+$0.012); “Revenue” $534.7M vs $624.3M (‑$89.6M). The revenue miss is driven by S&P’s bank revenue methodology that effectively includes provision (Day 1 CECL $75.6M), while ONB’s reported FTE total revenue was $654.4M . Values retrieved from S&P Global.*
- Forward consensus: S&P Primary EPS means trend up ($0.59 in Q3 2025E; $0.645 by Q2 2026E); revenue means ~$706–723M by Q4 2025–Q2 2026E as the larger balance sheet rolls forward (S&P Global).*
Values retrieved from S&P Global.
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Core earnings power is improving: NIM expansion, higher FTE revenue, and growing fee lines underpin H2 tailwinds despite CECL/merger noise .
- Deposit franchise remains an asset: low cost, stable NIB mix, and room to reprice brokered TDs lower should support margin resilience .
- Guidance skew is positive on NII/fees; loan growth prudently biased to the lower end amid CRE competition—expect C&I-led production with active portfolio management .
- Credit is normalizing but contained vs peers; criticized/classified reductions and adequate reserves (ACL 1.24% of loans) reduce downside risk .
- Bremer integration ahead of schedule with October conversion on track; securities repositioning already lifted portfolio yield and reduced duration/RWA density .
- Capital optionality improving; buybacks under consideration post-conversion could add to TSR if credit/margin trends hold .
- Near-term trading setup: Adjusted EPS beat and raised NII/fee guide are supportive, but headline “revenue” miss (vendor methodology) and elevated one-time CECL could create noise; focus on H2 NIM trajectory, deposit costs, and any color on buyback timing .
Footnotes:
- Values retrieved from S&P Global.