Suraj A. Palakshappa
About Suraj A. Palakshappa
Senior Vice President, General Counsel, Treasurer & Secretary at Oxford Industries, Inc. (OXM). Age 49 as of April 17, 2025; previously 48 (2024) and 47 (2023). Joined OXM’s legal department in 2006; served as Vice President‑Law, Deputy General Counsel & Assistant Secretary (2015–2019); appointed General Counsel & Secretary in 2019; named Treasurer in 2022 .
Company performance context: OXM’s long‑term incentive program uses multi‑year relative TSR; revenues rose from FY 2023 to FY 2024, then modestly declined in FY 2025; EBITDA decreased in FY 2024 vs FY 2023 and further declined in FY 2025 . Revenues and EBITDA trend are shown below with exact values and citations.
Past Roles
| Organization | Role | Years | Strategic Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oxford Industries (OXM) | Vice President‑Law, Deputy General Counsel & Assistant Secretary | 2015–2019 | Senior legal leadership; corporate governance support |
| Oxford Industries (OXM) | Vice President‑Law, General Counsel & Secretary | 2019–2022 | Chief legal officer; corporate secretary responsibilities |
| Oxford Industries (OXM) | Senior Vice President, General Counsel, Treasurer & Secretary | 2022–Present | Expanded remit to treasury oversight; continuing GC & Secretary roles |
| Oxford Industries (OXM) | Legal Department | 2006–2015 | Progressive legal roles; tenure establishes institutional knowledge |
Fixed Compensation
- Detailed compensation figures (base salary, target bonus %, actual bonus) are disclosed for “named executive officers” (NEOs) only; Mr. Palakshappa is not listed as an NEO in the 2023–2025 proxies, so his individual cash compensation amounts are not disclosed .
- Company program design: executive compensation elements include base salary, short‑term/annual cash incentives, and long‑term equity incentives under the LTIP; decisions overseen by an independent compensation committee advised by an independent consultant .
Performance Compensation
Program‑level structure (applies to NEOs; informs broader executive design):
- Short‑Term/Annual (Cash) Incentive: Company and segment Profit Before Tax (PBT) targets with threshold/target/max, paying based on actual performance; example FY 2022 outcomes for NEOs shown below .
- Long‑Term Incentive Plan (LTIP): Mix of performance‑based RSUs (3‑year relative TSR) and service‑based RSUs (cliff vest at ~3 years). Performance RSUs vest 0–200% of target based on TSR percentile versus a comparator group; payout capped at 100% if absolute TSR is negative .
FY 2022 Short‑Term Incentive (program-level example for NEOs)
| Metric | Threshold ($000s) | Target ($000s) | Maximum ($000s) | Actual | Payout (% of target) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PBT – Total Company | — | 159,250 | 191,100 | Above Max | 175% |
| PBT – Lilly Pulitzer | — | 59,470 | 69,877 | 59,019 | 96.7% |
| PBT – Tommy Bahama | — | 106,350 | 124,961 | Above Max | 175% |
Note: The cash incentive metrics above are representative of program design for NEOs; individual metrics/weightings for non‑NEO executives, including Mr. Palakshappa, are not disclosed .
Relative TSR Payout Schedule (LTIP)
| TSR Percentile Rank | RSUs Earned (% of Target) |
|---|---|
| <25% | 0% |
| 25% | 25% |
| 50% | 100% |
| 75% | 150% |
| ≥90% | 200% |
LTIP Vesting Milestones (program-level)
| LTIP Program Year | Performance Period End | Vesting Date (both RSU types) |
|---|---|---|
| Fiscal 2022 grants | May 2, 2025 | May 30, 2025 |
| Fiscal 2023 grants | May 1, 2026 | May 29, 2026 |
| Fiscal 2024 grants | Apr 30, 2027 | May 28, 2027 |
Equity Ownership & Alignment
- Stock ownership guidelines (to be met within 5 years of appointment): CEO—4.0x salary; President—2.5x; Executive Vice Presidents—2.0x; All Other Executive Officers—1.5x salary. Unearned performance‑based equity and unexercised options do not count toward guidelines (2025). Directors and executive officers are prohibited from hedging and pledging company stock; retention guideline of one year for vested/option‑exercised shares applies to executives (with nuances for guideline compliance) .
| Role | Required Multiple of Base Salary |
|---|---|
| CEO | 4.0x |
| President | 2.5x |
| Executive Vice Presidents | 2.0x |
| All Other Executive Officers | 1.5x |
Beneficial ownership tables list directors and NEOs by name; specific share counts for Mr. Palakshappa were not present in the excerpted management tables provided, and RSUs are excluded from beneficial ownership per footnotes .
Employment Terms
- At‑will employment; no written employment or severance agreements for NEOs (disclosed policy level) .
- Equity awards generally feature “double‑trigger” change‑of‑control vesting (CoC + termination without cause or for good reason); performance‑based RSUs may accelerate at target or based on actual relative TSR if awards are not assumed/continued upon CoC. Accelerated vesting also applies for death or disability; qualifying retirement (age 62+ with 5 years) yields prorated vesting at period conclusion .
- Clawback policy aligned with Dodd‑Frank/NYSE standards (adopted 2023), replacing a 2015 policy for incentives paid on/after October 2, 2023 .
- No excise tax gross‑ups; anti‑hedging and anti‑pledging policies; retention guidelines (1 year) for vested shares/options exercised; compensation committee uses independent consultant (Mercer) and peer benchmarking .
Company Performance Context (Revenues and EBITDA)
| Metric | FY 2023 | FY 2024 | FY 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue ($USD) | $1,411,528,000 | $1,571,475,000 | $1,516,601,000 |
| EBITDA ($USD) | $265,779,000* | $256,903,000* | $189,954,000* |
*Values retrieved from S&P Global.
Compensation Committee Analysis (Peer Group, Process)
- The compensation committee engages independent consultants (e.g., Mercer) and reviews market data and a retail/apparel peer set (e.g., Buckle, Carter’s, Children’s Place, Columbia Sportswear, Crocs, Deckers, DXL, G‑III, Guess?, J.Jill, Lands’ End, Steven Madden, Tilly’s, Wolverine World Wide, Zumiez) to guide design and benchmarking .
- Mr. Palakshappa and other senior executives attend portions of compensation committee meetings to assist with program design and provide market/legal governance updates (program governance detail) .
Investment Implications
- Alignment: Multi‑year relative TSR for performance RSUs, one‑year holding requirements, and strict anti‑hedging/anti‑pledging policies support shareholder alignment and reduce hedging/pledging‑related red flags .
- Retention & Change‑of‑Control: At‑will employment with no guaranteed severance, combined with double‑trigger CoC vesting and retirement/death/disability protections, lowers guaranteed cash outflows while still providing equity‑based retention value—balanced retention risk for key legal/treasury oversight roles .
- Pay‑for‑Performance Context: Program‑level cash incentives tied to PBT and LTIP tied to relative TSR create sensitivity to operating performance and shareholder returns; recent revenue/EBITDA trajectory underscores the importance of disciplined capital allocation and brand execution in equity vesting outcomes .
- Governance Quality: Use of independent compensation consultants, robust clawback, and strong shareholder support (e.g., prior say‑on‑pay approval) point to disciplined compensation oversight—supportive of risk management for legal/tax/treasury leadership continuity .
Notes: Individual compensation, grant counts, and insider trading activity for Mr. Palakshappa are not disclosed in the proxies as he is not listed among NEOs in 2023–2025 materials; ownership compliance is governed by company‑wide policies summarized above .