Sign in

You're signed outSign in or to get full access.

Suraj A. Palakshappa

Senior Vice President, General Counsel, Treasurer & Secretary at OXFORD INDUSTRIESOXFORD INDUSTRIES
Executive

About Suraj A. Palakshappa

Senior Vice President, General Counsel, Treasurer & Secretary at Oxford Industries, Inc. (OXM). Age 49 as of April 17, 2025; previously 48 (2024) and 47 (2023). Joined OXM’s legal department in 2006; served as Vice President‑Law, Deputy General Counsel & Assistant Secretary (2015–2019); appointed General Counsel & Secretary in 2019; named Treasurer in 2022 .
Company performance context: OXM’s long‑term incentive program uses multi‑year relative TSR; revenues rose from FY 2023 to FY 2024, then modestly declined in FY 2025; EBITDA decreased in FY 2024 vs FY 2023 and further declined in FY 2025 . Revenues and EBITDA trend are shown below with exact values and citations.

Past Roles

OrganizationRoleYearsStrategic Impact
Oxford Industries (OXM)Vice President‑Law, Deputy General Counsel & Assistant Secretary2015–2019Senior legal leadership; corporate governance support
Oxford Industries (OXM)Vice President‑Law, General Counsel & Secretary2019–2022Chief legal officer; corporate secretary responsibilities
Oxford Industries (OXM)Senior Vice President, General Counsel, Treasurer & Secretary2022–PresentExpanded remit to treasury oversight; continuing GC & Secretary roles
Oxford Industries (OXM)Legal Department2006–2015Progressive legal roles; tenure establishes institutional knowledge

Fixed Compensation

  • Detailed compensation figures (base salary, target bonus %, actual bonus) are disclosed for “named executive officers” (NEOs) only; Mr. Palakshappa is not listed as an NEO in the 2023–2025 proxies, so his individual cash compensation amounts are not disclosed .
  • Company program design: executive compensation elements include base salary, short‑term/annual cash incentives, and long‑term equity incentives under the LTIP; decisions overseen by an independent compensation committee advised by an independent consultant .

Performance Compensation

Program‑level structure (applies to NEOs; informs broader executive design):

  • Short‑Term/Annual (Cash) Incentive: Company and segment Profit Before Tax (PBT) targets with threshold/target/max, paying based on actual performance; example FY 2022 outcomes for NEOs shown below .
  • Long‑Term Incentive Plan (LTIP): Mix of performance‑based RSUs (3‑year relative TSR) and service‑based RSUs (cliff vest at ~3 years). Performance RSUs vest 0–200% of target based on TSR percentile versus a comparator group; payout capped at 100% if absolute TSR is negative .

FY 2022 Short‑Term Incentive (program-level example for NEOs)

MetricThreshold ($000s)Target ($000s)Maximum ($000s)ActualPayout (% of target)
PBT – Total Company159,250191,100Above Max175%
PBT – Lilly Pulitzer59,47069,87759,01996.7%
PBT – Tommy Bahama106,350124,961Above Max175%

Note: The cash incentive metrics above are representative of program design for NEOs; individual metrics/weightings for non‑NEO executives, including Mr. Palakshappa, are not disclosed .

Relative TSR Payout Schedule (LTIP)

TSR Percentile RankRSUs Earned (% of Target)
<25%0%
25%25%
50%100%
75%150%
≥90%200%

LTIP Vesting Milestones (program-level)

LTIP Program YearPerformance Period EndVesting Date (both RSU types)
Fiscal 2022 grantsMay 2, 2025May 30, 2025
Fiscal 2023 grantsMay 1, 2026May 29, 2026
Fiscal 2024 grantsApr 30, 2027May 28, 2027

Equity Ownership & Alignment

  • Stock ownership guidelines (to be met within 5 years of appointment): CEO—4.0x salary; President—2.5x; Executive Vice Presidents—2.0x; All Other Executive Officers—1.5x salary. Unearned performance‑based equity and unexercised options do not count toward guidelines (2025). Directors and executive officers are prohibited from hedging and pledging company stock; retention guideline of one year for vested/option‑exercised shares applies to executives (with nuances for guideline compliance) .
RoleRequired Multiple of Base Salary
CEO4.0x
President2.5x
Executive Vice Presidents2.0x
All Other Executive Officers1.5x

Beneficial ownership tables list directors and NEOs by name; specific share counts for Mr. Palakshappa were not present in the excerpted management tables provided, and RSUs are excluded from beneficial ownership per footnotes .

Employment Terms

  • At‑will employment; no written employment or severance agreements for NEOs (disclosed policy level) .
  • Equity awards generally feature “double‑trigger” change‑of‑control vesting (CoC + termination without cause or for good reason); performance‑based RSUs may accelerate at target or based on actual relative TSR if awards are not assumed/continued upon CoC. Accelerated vesting also applies for death or disability; qualifying retirement (age 62+ with 5 years) yields prorated vesting at period conclusion .
  • Clawback policy aligned with Dodd‑Frank/NYSE standards (adopted 2023), replacing a 2015 policy for incentives paid on/after October 2, 2023 .
  • No excise tax gross‑ups; anti‑hedging and anti‑pledging policies; retention guidelines (1 year) for vested shares/options exercised; compensation committee uses independent consultant (Mercer) and peer benchmarking .

Company Performance Context (Revenues and EBITDA)

MetricFY 2023FY 2024FY 2025
Revenue ($USD)$1,411,528,000 $1,571,475,000 $1,516,601,000
EBITDA ($USD)$265,779,000*$256,903,000*$189,954,000*

*Values retrieved from S&P Global.

Compensation Committee Analysis (Peer Group, Process)

  • The compensation committee engages independent consultants (e.g., Mercer) and reviews market data and a retail/apparel peer set (e.g., Buckle, Carter’s, Children’s Place, Columbia Sportswear, Crocs, Deckers, DXL, G‑III, Guess?, J.Jill, Lands’ End, Steven Madden, Tilly’s, Wolverine World Wide, Zumiez) to guide design and benchmarking .
  • Mr. Palakshappa and other senior executives attend portions of compensation committee meetings to assist with program design and provide market/legal governance updates (program governance detail) .

Investment Implications

  • Alignment: Multi‑year relative TSR for performance RSUs, one‑year holding requirements, and strict anti‑hedging/anti‑pledging policies support shareholder alignment and reduce hedging/pledging‑related red flags .
  • Retention & Change‑of‑Control: At‑will employment with no guaranteed severance, combined with double‑trigger CoC vesting and retirement/death/disability protections, lowers guaranteed cash outflows while still providing equity‑based retention value—balanced retention risk for key legal/treasury oversight roles .
  • Pay‑for‑Performance Context: Program‑level cash incentives tied to PBT and LTIP tied to relative TSR create sensitivity to operating performance and shareholder returns; recent revenue/EBITDA trajectory underscores the importance of disciplined capital allocation and brand execution in equity vesting outcomes .
  • Governance Quality: Use of independent compensation consultants, robust clawback, and strong shareholder support (e.g., prior say‑on‑pay approval) point to disciplined compensation oversight—supportive of risk management for legal/tax/treasury leadership continuity .

Notes: Individual compensation, grant counts, and insider trading activity for Mr. Palakshappa are not disclosed in the proxies as he is not listed among NEOs in 2023–2025 materials; ownership compliance is governed by company‑wide policies summarized above .