Sign in

Susan Street Whaley

Chief Legal Officer and Secretary at PG
Executive

About Susan Street Whaley

Chief Legal Officer and Secretary at Procter & Gamble (PG), appointed a Section 16 officer effective July 1, 2022, following prior senior legal leadership roles across North America, practice groups and sector business units . She is 51 years old as of August 4, 2025 and has been an executive officer since 2022 . Company performance context relevant to incentive design: FY 2024-25 net income was $16.1B, organic sales growth was 1.8%, and the value of a $100 investment in PG’s TSR framework was $150.71, versus $170.04 for the S&P 500 Consumer Staples Index, driving below-target annual bonus outcomes that year and a PSP payout of 148% for the 2022–2025 cycle based on financials and top-quartile relative TSR .

Past Roles

OrganizationRoleYearsStrategic impact / evidence
Procter & GambleChief Legal Officer & Secretary2022–presentAppointed Section 16 officer effective 7/1/2022; listed as executive officer in 2023–2025 10-Ks .
Procter & GambleSVP & General Counsel – North America, Practice Groups & Sector Business Units2019–2022Senior legal leadership for NA, practice groups and sector units (disclosed in exec officer bios) .
Procter & GambleVP & General Counsel – North America, Global Go‑To‑Market & Practice Groups, and Global Business Units2016–2019Broader commercial and global BU legal coverage (exec officer bios) .
Procter & GambleAssistant Secretary2015–2016Corporate secretary function; executed multiple SEC filings as Assistant Secretary .

External Roles

No public company board or external directorships disclosed in PG filings reviewed (executive officer bios and proxy materials) .

Fixed Compensation

  • Base salary is determined via peer benchmarking and role scope; salary progression is linked to performance and market position under PG’s framework (specific salary for Ms. Whaley not disclosed because she is not an NEO) .
  • Annual cash incentive program (STAR) applies to senior executives with targets set as a % of salary; the Company factor is based on organic sales growth and core EPS growth; executives may elect stock options in lieu of cash (individual target/payout for Ms. Whaley not disclosed) .

Performance Compensation

Annual Bonus (STAR) – Company Design and Latest Actuals (FY 2023–24)

MetricWeightingTargetActualPayout / FactorNotes
Organic Sales Growth50% (Company Factor)4.5%3.9%Included in 120% Company FactorCompany factor equally weighted: OSG and Core EPS Growth .
Core EPS Growth50% (Company Factor)7.5–8.5%11.7%Included in 120% Company FactorOutperformance on Core EPS supported higher factor .
ESG FactorModifier100%100%No change to 120% Company FactorESG Factor removed for FY 2025–26 going forward .
  • STAR formula also includes a weighted Business Unit Performance Factor (70%) with the ESG‑adjusted Company Factor at 30% for NEOs; executives may elect options instead of cash, creating potential three‑year vesting overhang of sales supply when those options vest .

Long‑Term Incentives – Performance Stock Program (PSP) Structure

MetricWeightingTargetActual (2012–2025 cycle)Payout
Relative Organic Sales Growth (percentile)30%50th percentile50th percentile100%
Constant Currency Core Before‑Tax Operating Profit Growth (3‑yr CAGR)20%7.0%10.3%166%
Core EPS Growth (3‑yr CAGR)30%5.3%5.5%104%
Adjusted Free Cash Flow Productivity20%90%95%120%
Relative TSR MultiplierAdj.100% baselineTop quartile125%
Final PSP Payout148%
  • New cycle PSP goalposts (FY 2024–25 to FY 2026–27) maintain balanced design across Relative Organic Sales Growth, Constant Currency Core BTOP, Core EPS Growth, and Adjusted FCF Productivity with 0–200% payout curves and a relative TSR multiplier (75% bottom quartile, 125% top quartile) .

Long‑Term Incentive (LTIP) – Vesting Mechanics

  • Stock options: three‑year cliff vest; 10‑year term; subject to earlier expiration on certain terminations .
  • RSUs: three‑year cliff vest with share delivery upon vesting (with dividend equivalents) .
  • STAR-in-lieu-of-cash options also vest on a three‑year schedule (e.g., FY 2023–24 STAR options become exercisable 9/13/2027) .

Equity Ownership & Alignment

Beneficial Ownership Snapshot (Initial Section 16 Filing)

As of (Form)SecurityAmountOwnership formNotes
2022-07-07 (Form 3)Common Stock5,131.0191Direct (D)Initial statement of beneficial ownership upon becoming CLO & Secretary .
2022-07-07 (Form 3)Common Stock7,449.6526Indirect (I)By Retirement Plan Trustee (PST/ESOP) .
2022-07-07 (Form 3)Series A ESOP Preferred2,062.9676Indirect (I)Convertible to common per plan mechanics .

Option Grants Disclosed on Form 3 (Existing Grants at Appointment)

DerivativeDate First ExercisableExpirationUnderlying Shares (#)Exercise Price ($)Ownership
Stock Option (LTIP)02/28/202302/28/20305,263113.23Direct
Stock Option (LTIP)09/29/202310/01/20307,730139.24Direct
Stock Option (LTIP)10/01/202410/01/20318,365139.58Direct
  • Stock ownership requirements: Executive Share Ownership Program requires executives to hold a multiple of salary; for NEOs other than CEO the requirement is 4x salary (CEO 8x). As of June 30, 2025, all NEOs exceeded requirements (individual compliance for Ms. Whaley not disclosed) .
  • Pledging/hedging: Company policy prohibits hedging, short sales, pledging, collars and other derivative transactions by directors and senior executives; trading permitted during post‑earnings windows or under approved 10b5‑1 plans .
  • Clawbacks: Dodd‑Frank recoupment policy (mandatory) for Section 16 officers and a separate recoupment policy for other senior executives; equity plans also include recovery provisions for conduct contrary to company interests .

Employment Terms

  • No individual employment agreements or special “golden parachute” severance for executives; where the Company encourages a U.S. employee to terminate (not for cause), a separation allowance of up to one year’s salary may be provided based on years of service (not guaranteed) .
  • Change‑in‑control: Company states it does not grant equity awards that vest immediately solely on account of a change in control .
  • Tax gross‑ups: Generally not provided for personal income taxes on executive or severance benefits, with limited exceptions for expatriate-related items or certain acquisition‑related pre‑existing obligations .

Performance & Track Record (Company context influencing incentives)

Fiscal YearPG TSR – $100 BaseS&P 500 Staples TSR – $100 BaseNet Income ($B)Organic Sales Growth
2024–25150.71170.0416.11.8%
2023–24152.28151.6015.03.9%
2022–23136.63140.1714.76.9%
  • FY 2024–25 targets were 3–5% Organic Sales Growth, 5–7% Core EPS Growth, and 90% Adjusted FCF Productivity; actuals were below target ranges, contributing to below‑target STAR outcomes for that year .
  • PSP (2022–2025) paid 148% of target, with strong cash conversion and profit growth plus a top‑quartile relative TSR multiplier .

Say‑on‑Pay & Peer Group

Year/MeetingResult / Update
2024 Annual MeetingSay‑on‑pay approval 90.65% FOR .
2022 Annual Meeting“More than 92%” Say‑on‑pay support (disclosed in 2023 proxy) .
2025–26 Compensation Peer GroupEli Lilly added; Mondelez and 3M removed (used for FY 2025–26 decisions) .

Governance, Risk Indicators & Policies Relevant to Alignment

  • Anti‑hedging/pledging policy covering senior executives and related persons/entities; trades limited to post‑earnings windows or pre‑cleared alternatives .
  • Dual recoupment framework (Dodd‑Frank mandatory for Section 16 officers; senior executive policy broader) and plan‑level recovery provisions for misconduct .
  • Strong say‑on‑pay results signal broad investor support for pay‑for‑performance design .
  • No special executive employment agreements or single‑trigger vesting upon change‑in‑control; limited separation allowance framework moderates severance risk .

Compensation Structure Analysis (Design levers)

  • High at‑risk mix: Majority of senior executive compensation delivered via PSP and LTIP with 3‑year horizons and a relative TSR modifier, reducing near‑term gaming and anchoring outcomes to multi‑year value creation .
  • STAR metrics tied to organic sales and core EPS, with BU and company weighting; ESG factor removed prospectively (FY 2025–26), simplifying the model and focusing on financial drivers .
  • Options/RSUs 3‑year cliff vest create predictable potential supply of insider liquidity around vesting dates, bounded by trading windows and holding requirements where applicable .

Expertise & Qualifications (from filings)

  • Career P&G legal executive with progressive responsibility, including GC roles across North America and global commercial/legal functions, and corporate secretary responsibilities; executive officer since 2022 .
  • No education or certification details disclosed in the company documents reviewed .

Investment Implications

  • Alignment: Strong pay‑for‑performance architecture (PSP weighted to profit growth, cash productivity and relative TSR; STAR tied to organic sales and core EPS) supports shareholder alignment and reduces earnings‑management risk; say‑on‑pay support remains high .
  • Retention/selling pressure: Three‑year cliff vesting on options/RSUs and share ownership/holding requirements constrain near‑term selling; monitor future Form 4s around vesting anniversaries and post‑earnings windows for any pattern of liquidity events .
  • Governance risk mitigants: Prohibitions on hedging/pledging and robust clawback regime reduce downside governance risk; absence of special executive employment agreements and single‑trigger CIC vesting lowers severance/change‑in‑control risk .
  • Performance execution: FY 2024–25 saw below‑target results on key financial measures (contributing to lower annual bonus outcomes), yet the multi‑year PSP still paid above target on strong profit/cash conversion and relative TSR—underscoring the design’s emphasis on durable multi‑year value creation rather than single‑year prints .

Best AI for Equity Research

Performance on expert-authored financial analysis tasks

Fintool-v490%
Claude Sonnet 4.555.3%
o348.3%
GPT 546.9%
Grok 440.3%
Qwen 3 Max32.7%

Best AI for Equity Research

Performance on expert-authored financial analysis tasks

Fintool-v490%
Claude Sonnet 4.555.3%
o348.3%
GPT 546.9%
Grok 440.3%
Qwen 3 Max32.7%