Sign in

Laura Clark

Chief Operating Officer at Rexford Industrial Realty
Executive

About Laura Clark

Laura Clark is Chief Operating Officer at Rexford Industrial Realty, appointed November 18, 2024 after serving as Chief Financial Officer since September 2020; she is 45 years old, holds a B.S. in Finance from DePaul University and an MBA from Ball State, and is a CFA charterholder with 23 years of finance, accounting, real estate, and operations experience . Her compensation design ties pay-for-performance to annual STI targets (70% quantitative, 20% qualitative, 10% ESG) and multi‑year LTI awards driven by relative TSR versus the Dow Jones U.S. Equity REIT Index and Core FFO per diluted share growth, with an absolute TSR modifier constraining/enhancing payouts (0–275% of target) . For 2024, her STI paid at the maximum (200% of base) reflecting Company achievements, and her LTI target value rose 20% year-over-year in connection with her promotion .

Past Roles

OrganizationRoleYearsStrategic Impact
Regency Centers (NASDAQ: REG)SVP, Capital Markets2017–2020Public REIT experience; capital markets leadership
Regency CentersVP, Financial Services (West Region)2012–2017Oversaw operational analysis, budgeting, reporting
Green Street AdvisorsInstitutional Sales & Equity ResearchNot disclosedResearch and market-facing expertise
Iron Tree CapitalVice President, Capital MarketsNot disclosedCapital markets experience
Inland Capital Markets GroupVice PresidentNot disclosedCapital markets experience

External Roles

  • Proxy executive background does not list any external public company directorships or board committee roles for Ms. Clark .

Fixed Compensation

Metric202220232024
Base Salary ($)$575,000 $650,000 $700,000
Base Salary YoY Change (%)8%
Target Bonus (% of Base)150% 150% 150%
Maximum Bonus (% of Base)200% 200% 200%
Actual Bonus Paid ($)$1,150,000 $1,300,000 $1,400,000
All Other Compensation ($)$17,351 $18,323 $15,548

Performance Compensation

Annual Short-Term Incentive (STI)

Element2024 Design2024 Target2024 ActualPayout FormNotes
Weighting70% Quantitative / 20% Qualitative / 10% ESG Paid at maximum Cash Co-CEOs elected LTIP units (fully vested), Clark paid cash
Opportunity (% of Base)Threshold 100%; Target 150%; Max 200% $1,050,000 (150% of $700k) $1,400,000 (200% of base) Cash No increase to 2024/2025 bonus opportunities

Long-Term Incentive (LTI) – LTIP Units

ComponentMetricGrant Date / Performance PeriodTarget Value ($)VestingPayout Range
Service‑Vesting LTIP Units (2024)Time‑basedAwarded Nov 2024 ($1,275,000) and Mar 2025 ($255,000) $1,530,000 Ratable over 3 years; unvested portions scheduled Nov 16, 2025/2026/2027 N/A (time-based)
Performance‑Vesting LTIP Units (2024)Relative TSR vs DJ U.S. Equity REIT Index; Core FFO/share growth; absolute TSR modifier TSR: Nov 16, 2024–Nov 15, 2027; Core FFO: Jan 1, 2025–Dec 31, 2027 $1,870,000 Earned at end of period; vest per achievement 0–225% pre‑modifier; 0–275% post‑modifier
Total LTI Target (2024)Combined2024$3,400,000 See aboveSee above
Total LTI Target (2023)Combined2023$2,835,000
YoY Change20% increase tied to promotion

Equity Ownership & Alignment

ItemValue/PolicyStatus
Beneficial Ownership (as of Apr 3, 2025)58,467 shares/units; less than 1% of outstanding Active executive holder
Ownership Guidelines3x base salary for COO/CFO/GC; 6x for Co‑CEOs All NEOs satisfied or within 5‑year period as of Apr 14, 2025
Anti‑Hedging PolicyProhibits puts, calls, derivatives, collars, forwards by insiders and family In force
Anti‑Pledging PolicyProhibits pledging/margin; exceptions only if above ownership minimum, sufficient liquidity, and not used for hedging In force
Service‑Vest LTIP HoldOne‑year post‑vesting hold added for awards granted in 2025 and beyond Reduces near‑term selling pressure
2024 Vesting Activity32,417 units vested; $1,279,804 value realized Demonstrates ongoing equity realization

Employment Terms

TermDetail
Current RoleChief Operating Officer since November 2024; previously CFO since September 2020
Agreement Term & RenewalClark’s agreement expires November 8, 2025; auto‑renews for successive one‑year periods unless 120‑day notice of non‑renewal
Severance TriggersWithout cause or for good reason; death/disability provisions; time‑based equity acceleration on CoC
Non‑Solicit18 months post‑termination; confidentiality provisions customary
ClawbackSEC/NYSE‑compliant clawback policy adopted under Rule 10D‑1
Tax Gross‑UpNo excise tax gross‑ups; best‑pay‑cap reduction considered under 280G/4999

Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control (as of Dec 31, 2024)

ScenarioCash Severance ($)Continued Health ($)Equity Acceleration ($)Total ($)
Death/Disability$1,400,000 $45,828 $7,412,127 $8,857,955
Qualifying Termination (no CoC)$3,208,333 $45,828 $7,412,127 $10,666,288
Change in Control (no Termination)$3,399,992 $3,399,992
Qualifying Termination in Connection with CoC$4,112,500 $45,828 $3,399,992 $7,558,320

Performance‑vesting LTIP values in CoC scenarios are determined using actual TSR through Dec 31, 2024 and target Core FFO base units, valued at the Dec 31, 2024 share price ($38.66) methodology described in the proxy .

Compensation Structure Analysis

  • Variable pay emphasis: Other NEOs (including Clark) have ~84% target pay variable; LTI metrics streamlined to relative TSR and Core FFO/share, with an absolute TSR modifier and reduced maximum payout from 300% to 275% .
  • Governance enhancements: Added one‑year post‑vesting hold for service‑vesting LTIP units beginning 2025; increased formulaic STI components to 80%; removed largest peers from compensation peer group .
  • Base pay restraint: No increases to 2025 base salaries; 2024 base increased 8% for Clark based on performance and peer competitiveness .
  • Risk controls: Anti‑hedging/anti‑pledging policies; SEC/NYSE‑compliant clawback; broad compensation risk assessment concluded programs do not pose material risk .

Equity Ownership & Alignment Details

CategoryDetail
Shares/Units Beneficially Owned58,467; less than 1% of shares outstanding
Ownership ComplianceNEOs met guidelines (or within 5‑year window); COO guideline 3x salary; unearned performance LTIP units excluded from guideline calculation
Pledging/HedgingProhibited; exceptions require exceeding guideline and liquidity safeguards; margin accounts barred

Employment Contracts, Severance, and Change‑of‑Control Economics

  • Agreement term and renewal cadence disclosed; severance available for without‑cause or good‑reason terminations, with healthcare continuation and time‑based equity acceleration; performance awards remain outstanding subject to actual performance attainment .
  • Single‑trigger CoC acceleration applies to time‑based LTIP units for Clark and Lanzer; performance LTIP treated per award terms and actual performance measurement at CoC .
  • No excise tax gross‑ups; best‑pay‑cap reductions considered to optimize after‑tax outcomes .

Performance & Track Record

  • 2024 STI paid at maximum for Clark (200% of base), reflecting quantitative, qualitative, and ESG achievements determined by the Compensation Committee .
  • Company highlighted Clark’s “substantial contributions as CFO” and promotion to COO to drive operational and growth value creation .

Investment Implications

  • Alignment: Strong equity alignment via 3x salary ownership guideline, anti‑hedging/pledging policies, and added one‑year hold on service‑vesting LTIPs from 2025, reducing near‑term selling pressure and aligning with long‑term TSR/FFO outcomes .
  • Retention and CoC risk: Clark’s substantial potential payouts and single‑trigger acceleration of time‑based awards at CoC may modestly elevate CoC event sensitivity; however, performance LTIPs rely on actual performance measurement, preserving pay‑for‑performance integrity .
  • Pay‑for‑performance: Max STI payout in 2024 and promotion‑linked 20% LTI target increase signal high execution expectations; streamlined LTI metrics and absolute TSR modifier should constrain windfalls if absolute returns are weak .
  • Governance quality: No tax gross‑ups, robust clawback, and risk assessment suggest shareholder‑friendly design; removal of largest peers may temper pay inflation risk and better calibrate benchmarking .