RC
RENASANT CORP (RNST)·Q3 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q3 2025 adjusted diluted EPS was $0.77, a slight miss versus S&P Global consensus $0.78; GAAP diluted EPS was $0.63 as merger/conversion expenses weighed on results; adjusted EPS improved YoY versus $0.70 in Q3 2024 . EPS consensus values from S&P Global: $0.78*.
- Net interest margin held at 3.85% (FTE), with adjusted NIM up 4 bps QoQ to 3.62%, supported by loan growth of $462.1M (9.9% annualized); cost of total deposits rose 2 bps QoQ to 2.14% .
- Noninterest income declined $2.3M QoQ (ex-MSR gain in Q2), and mortgage banking income fell $2.2M QoQ on lower lock volume and gain-on-sale margin; provision for credit losses was $10.5M as criticized loans rose broadly .
- Capital actions: Board approved a $150M share repurchase authorization (no Q3 buybacks), redeemed $60M sub debt on Oct 1, and raised the quarterly dividend to $0.23 (+$0.01) payable Jan 1, 2026—key potential stock catalysts .
- Management guided to modest NIM contraction in Q4 and core noninterest expense reductions of $2–3M in Q4 and another $2–3M in Q1 2026, with modeled synergies more evident going forward .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
-
What Went Well
- “Renasant’s financial performance in the third quarter was strong with good loan growth and profit improvement… The integration with The First continues to go well” — Kevin D. Chapman (CEO) .
- Adjusted net interest margin expanded 4 bps QoQ to 3.62%; net interest income (FTE) rose to $228.1M (+$5.4M QoQ) helped by loan growth .
- Capital flexibility improved: new $150M buyback authorization, sub debt redemption ($60M), book value per share increased to $40.26; TCE ratio 8.98% .
-
What Went Wrong
- Noninterest income softened QoQ (−$2.3M ex-MSR) and mortgage banking income fell $2.2M QoQ; gain-on-sale margin decreased to 1.32%, lock volume down $89.4M QoQ .
- Deposit costs rose 2 bps QoQ (cost of total deposits 2.14%); management cited ongoing competitive pressure in deposit pricing .
- Credit metrics mixed: criticized loans to total loans increased to 3.22% (vs 2.66% in Q2); NPLs/loans rose to 0.90% (vs 0.76% in Q2); coverage ratio declined to 173.47% (vs 204.97% in Q2) .
Financial Results
Headline P&L and EPS across periods (oldest → newest):
Profitability and spread metrics:
Balance sheet and capital:
Credit quality:
Revenue and EPS vs S&P Global consensus (current year):
Values marked with * retrieved from S&P Global.
Segment breakdown – Noninterest income composition:
Key KPIs:
Guidance Changes
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- “The integration with The First continues to go well and we believe positions us to meet the financial goals of the merger.” — Kevin D. Chapman (CEO) .
- “With systems conversion now complete, we expect modeled synergies to be more evident in our results going forward.” — Jim Mabry (CFO) .
- “Our adjusted total cost of deposits increased by four basis points to 2.08%, while our adjusted loan yields increased five basis points to 6.23%.” — Kevin D. Chapman (CEO) .
- “Our sense is that we could grow those capital ratios anywhere between 60 and 70 basis points between now and year-end 2026… Buyback is certainly high on that list in terms of levers we might pull.” — Jim Mabry (CFO) .
Q&A Highlights
- Loan growth and pipelines: Broad-based growth across geographies and lending units, including Gulf Coast legacy markets; management expects continued opportunities post-integration .
- Expense trajectory: Core NIE expected to decline $2–3M in Q4 and another $2–3M in Q1 2026; majority of conversion costs recorded by Q3 .
- Margin outlook: Modest contraction in Q4; modest expansion in 2026, assuming four rate cuts; scheduled accretion likely to track Q3 levels .
- Credit update: Criticized loans increased broadly (CRE, C&I, self-storage, senior housing); management does not see loss exposure in the downgrade cohort and emphasizes proactive risk-grading .
- Deposit strategy: Aim to grow core deposits in line with loan growth; some public fund seasonality may reverse in late Q4; deposit pricing competition remains elevated .
Estimates Context
- Q3 2025 adjusted EPS of $0.77 was a slight miss versus S&P Global consensus $0.78; revenue of $259.1M missed consensus $271.2M, driven by lower mortgage banking and slightly higher funding costs; provision remained elevated with criticized loans up QoQ . EPS and revenue consensus/actual values from S&P Global*.
- Q2 2025 EPS missed ($0.69 vs $0.73*) and revenue missed materially ($185.9M vs $264.0M*), reflecting merger-related noise and day-one provisions . Values from S&P Global*.
- Q1 2025 EPS beat ($0.66 vs $0.61*), though revenue was modestly below ($165.9M vs $170.1M*), as NIM improved and deposit costs fell . Values from S&P Global*.
Values marked with * retrieved from S&P Global.
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Integration synergy realization is shifting from conversion to operating leverage: adjusted NIM up 4 bps QoQ and core NIE reductions guided for Q4 and Q1 2026, supporting margin and efficiency improvement in 2026 .
- Loan growth is strong and broad-based (+$462.1M QoQ), but funding costs and deposit competition temper spread gains; watch deposit betas and public fund seasonality into late Q4 .
- Credit metrics warrant monitoring: criticized loans ratio rose to 3.22% and NPLs/loans to 0.90%; coverage remains solid at 173%, but trajectory bears watching as rates evolve .
- Capital return optionality increased: $150M buyback authorization, dividend raised to $0.23, and sub debt redeemed—providing flexibility to support organic growth and potential shareholder returns .
- Near-term modeling: anticipate modest NIM contraction in Q4, then modest expansion in 2026; factor in $2–3M QoQ reductions in core NIE in Q4 and Q1 2026 .
- Mortgage banking softer QoQ (lower locks and gain-on-sale margins); fee mix shifting toward wealth management and BOLI—diversification helps but contributes less upside than mortgage peaks .
- Potential catalysts: synergy delivery (efficiency ratio progress), deposit mix improvements, buyback execution, and credit normalization; risks include deposit pricing pressure and criticized loan migration .