RA
ROCKWELL AUTOMATION, INC (ROK)·Q3 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q3 FY25 delivered a clean beat versus consensus: revenue $2.144B vs $2.068B estimate and adjusted EPS $2.82 vs $2.67 estimate; diluted EPS was $2.60. Management raised FY25 adjusted EPS guidance to $9.80–$10.20 and diluted EPS to $8.89–$9.29 . Revenue/EPS estimates from S&P Global: $2.068B and $2.669*, respectively; actuals $2.144B and $2.82 [Q3 2025]*.
- Segment mix improved: Software & Control sales +23% YoY with margin 31.6%, offsetting softness in Lifecycle Services (-6% YoY, margin 13.3%). Total segment operating margin expanded to 21.2% (+40 bps YoY) on productivity, pricing and mix .
- Book-to-bill held ~1.0 and ARR +7% YoY; operating cash flow $527M and free cash flow $489M (FCF conversion 153%), underscoring strong cash generation .
- FY25 outlook tightened and improved at the midpoint (reported sales ~$8.2B, organic growth -2% to +1%; FX now ~0%). CFO guided corporate & other ~$155M, net interest ~$140M, ETR ~17%, and reiterated ~20% segment margin for FY25 .
- Stock-relevant catalysts: raised EPS guidance, visible margin expansion trajectory, $2B multi-year investment program (plants, digital infrastructure, talent) to drive next-horizon operating margin targets; potential tariff-related demand timing noted (possible 2–3 pts Q3 pull-ins) .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
What Went Well
- Pricing, productivity and mix expansion drove margin leverage; total segment margin 21.2% (vs 20.8% YoY). CEO: “strong execution and significant progress toward our long-term margin expansion goals… investing over $2 billion… majority… capital investment in the United States” .
- Software & Control strength: sales $629M (+23% YoY), margin 31.6% (+800 bps YoY). CFO: “incrementals… mid-40s with strong volume” .
- Cash generation: operating cash flow $527M, FCF $489M, FCF conversion 153% in Q3. CFO: “Free cash flow… $251M higher than prior year” .
What Went Wrong
- Lifecycle Services softness: sales -6% YoY to $547M; margin down 600 bps YoY to 13.3% on lower volume and higher compensation; customers delaying larger capital projects amid trade/policy uncertainty .
- ARR growth below internal expectations: ARR +7% YoY as double-digit cloud-native growth was offset by weakness in recurring services (cybersecurity delays) .
- Compensation and FX headwinds: higher compensation (normalized incentives) and transactional FX (Mexico, Poland) pressured EPS by ~$0.15 in the quarter .
Financial Results
Consolidated metrics
Consensus vs Actual (Q3 FY25)
Values retrieved from S&P Global*
Segment breakdown
KPIs and Cash
Guidance Changes
Management indicated FY25 FCF conversion ~100% and reiterated tariff impact mitigation via resiliency actions and pricing; FX now a ~$0.10 EPS headwind for FY25 .
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- Blake Moret (CEO): “We returned to year-over-year sales growth… investing over $2 billion in our plants, digital infrastructure and talent… The United States will be the largest beneficiary… primarily CapEx” .
- Moret on demand/pipeline: “Projects… seeing delays, but not cancellations… we expect a higher intake of orders related to new U.S. capacity in FY25 and up again in FY26” .
- Christian Rothe (CFO): “Adjusted EPS of $2.82 was above our expectations… price realization strong… we saw excellent execution on cost reduction and margin expansion actions” .
- CFO on tariff/pricing: “EPS impact… mitigated… ~one point of our sales growth in Q3 was attributable to tariff-based pricing… possible that pull-ins accounted for at most two to three points” .
- CEO on Intelligent Devices margin path: committed to 22–24% corridor; levers include direct material cost reductions, long-tail SKU pricing, configured-to-order recovery, ClearPath profitability improvements .
Q&A Highlights
- $2B multi-year internal investment program is “solidly on offense,” primarily CapEx with ROI-based hurdles, aimed at expanding margins beyond the 23.5% segment margin target introduced in 2023 .
- Pricing/outlook: Full-year price realization now 2%+, with ~1 pt tariff-based price in Q3; organization continues to find opportunities into next year .
- Demand timing: Some product-level pull-forwards in Q3; backlog flattish; lifecycle book-to-bill >1; broader project delays tied to trade/policy uncertainty .
- Compensation normalization: FY25 compensation (merit + bonus) ~$230M; next year expected to be fairly normalized as well .
- FY26 tax headwind: Pillar Two could add 2–3 pts to ETR, an EPS headwind; U.S. tax bill benefits limited for Rockwell .
Estimates Context
- Q3 FY25 results beat consensus: revenue $2.144B vs $2.068B*, adjusted/primary EPS $2.82 vs $2.669*; EBITDA $459M vs $457M*. Management raised FY25 EPS ranges and tightened sales outlook at a higher midpoint .
- Next quarter (Q4 FY25) consensus as of S&P Global: revenue $2.206B*, EPS $2.939*; management guides low single-digit sequential sales growth in Q4 with margins similar to Q3 (mix headwind vs leverage) .
Values retrieved from S&P Global*
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Beat-and-raise quarter: Broad-based execution with pricing/productivity driving margin expansion and stronger cash conversion; guidance raised for both diluted and adjusted EPS .
- Mix tailwinds from Software & Control (Logic strength, SaaS growth) offset Lifecycle project delays; segment margin profile increasingly levered to software/hardware controls .
- Tariff dynamics largely EPS-neutral; be mindful of timing shifts (possible 2–3 pts Q3 pull-ins) and FX transactional headwinds; still favorable price/cost backdrop .
- Structural margin story intact: $360M cost savings achieved, program embedded into core; $2B internal investment should extend margin runway beyond 23.5% medium-term target .
- Cash return: OCF/FCF strong; active buybacks (~0.5M shares in Q3) and dividend declared ($1.31 payable Sept 10) support total shareholder return .
- Watch FY26 ETR: OECD Pillar Two likely +2–3 pts to ETR, an EPS headwind; management intends to offset via price and continued productivity .
- Near-term setup: Q4 guided up low single digits sequentially with similar margins; discrete/hybrid end markets improving; greenfield and brownfield wins in U.S. capacity are a medium-term demand tailwind .