RI
RXO, Inc. (RXO)·Q3 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q3 revenue was $1.42B (+36.6% y/y) with gross margin of 16.5% (down 80 bps y/y); adjusted EBITDA was $32M (2.3% margin) and adjusted EPS was $0.01, as rising purchased transportation costs squeezed contractual margins amid soft demand .
- Results missed Wall Street on EPS and revenue and came in below EBITDA consensus: EPS $0.01 vs $0.038 estimate, revenue $1.421B vs $1.431B estimate, and EBITDA $28M vs $35M estimate; brokerage gross margin fell to 13.5% (low end of outlook) as buy rates rose without offsetting spot opportunities (Street data via S&P Global; see Estimates Context) .
- Guidance for Q4: adjusted EBITDA $20–$30M; brokerage volume down low-single digits y/y and brokerage GM% 12%–13%, below typical seasonality, driven by sustained supply-driven tightness and weakening big-and-bulky Last Mile demand post-Labor Day .
- Management initiated >$30M of incremental annualized cost actions (bringing cumulative expense reductions to >$155M) and highlighted AI-driven productivity (brokerage +19% LTM) and LTL outperformance (+43% volume) as long-term earnings drivers .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
What Went Well
- LTL strength and volume outperformance: Brokerage volume +1% y/y, with LTL +43% y/y (31% of brokerage volume); truckload revenue per load up 1% y/y despite demand softness .
- Productivity and cash conversion: Brokerage productivity +19% over the last 12 months; adjusted free cash flow conversion of 56% (Q3), with cash balance up sequentially to $25M and total committed liquidity of $590M .
- Technology/AI execution: Launched next-gen pricing on combined dataset; agentic AI for carrier inquiries; AI image QA in Last Mile; management emphasized AI as an operating margin lever .
What Went Wrong
- Margin squeeze from supply-driven tightness: Contractual book (≈70% TL) saw gross profit per load pressure as buy rates rose without sale-rate or spot offsets; brokerage GM% fell to 13.5% and October’s TL GP/load was ~25% below its 5-year average (ex-COVID) .
- Demand weakening and Last Mile deceleration: Big-and-bulky Last Mile demand weakened since Labor Day, reversing typical Q4 seasonality; complementary services GM% was 21.3% (stable but below truck brokerage pressure) .
- Automotive headwinds and Q3 miss vs prior outlook: Automotive was a ~$5M y/y margin headwind; adjusted EBITDA of $32M landed “slightly below our outlook” and below Q2’s Q3 guide ($33–$43M) .
Financial Results
Headline metrics (y/y and sequential)
Actuals vs S&P Global Consensus (Q3 2025)
Values with asterisks (*) retrieved from S&P Global.
Segment breakdown
KPIs and operating metrics
Guidance Changes
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- “Market conditions tightened late in the third quarter as truckload capacity exits accelerated… Both dynamics have continued into the fourth quarter.” – CEO Drew Wilkerson .
- “We’re hitting an inflection point with our AI investments… it will actually mean [higher] operating margin” – CEO on AI differentiation .
- “Our results were slightly below our outlook… [contract] margin squeezed in September… Automotive was a continued headwind (~$5M y/y margin impact)” – CFO Jamie Harris .
- “Buy rates moved higher in September and even more in October despite weaker demand… two-thirds of our freight came from outbound states with buy rate increases” – CSO Jared Weisfeld .
- “We’re taking additional actions… more than $30M of incremental annualized savings… total reduction >$155M” – CFO .
- “Every penny of buy rate increase is ~$2.5M of quarterly EBITDA headwind for us” – CEO, sensitivity .
Q&A Highlights
- Regulatory enforcement and capacity exits: Management views enforcement as a major structural change (bigger than ELDs), likely reducing industry capacity and setting up a sharper inflection when demand returns .
- Coyote acquisition and pricing: CEO acknowledged a 2025 pricing decision mistake that hurt volumes; on people/customers/tech, integration has progressed well; expect long-term benefits .
- Leverage and covenants: Net leverage 2.3x; Q4 midpoint would be ~2.8x vs 4.5x covenant—ample headroom .
- AI differentiation: Emphasis on tangible operational results over PR; inflection point across pricing, carrier communication, and Last Mile QA—expected to support margins .
- Last Mile and demand: Big-and-bulky demand weakening since Labor Day; Q4 Last Mile expected down sequentially vs typical seasonality .
- Margin sensitivity: Industry spot linehaul up ~6c/mile over two months; RXO’s buy rate increase less than industry; each 1c/mile ≈ $2.5M EBITDA headwind per quarter .
Estimates Context
- Q3 2025 vs S&P Global consensus: EPS $0.01 vs $0.0379 estimate (MISS); revenue $1,421M vs $1,430.6M estimate (MISS); EBITDA $28M vs $35.3M estimate (MISS). Values retrieved from S&P Global.*
- Street estimates likely need to reflect: (1) Q4 EBITDA guide of $20–$30M below typical seasonal uplift; (2) brokerage GM% guide of 12%–13% amid sustained supply-driven tightness; and (3) Last Mile sequential decline due to big-and-bulky softness .
*Values retrieved from S&P Global.
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Near-term squeeze persists: Supply-driven buy-rate inflation without spot offsets is pressuring contractual margins; Q4 guide embeds continued tightness and weaker Last Mile, implying downside to seasonal norms .
- Structural setup: If enforcement persists, capacity exits could elevate cycle earnings power for scaled brokers; watch tender rejections approaching 10% for spot-led price relief .
- Cost actions and AI are offsets: >$30M new savings (>$155M cumulative) and AI-driven productivity (+19% LTM) help defend margins and set up operating leverage into a recovery .
- Mix matters: LTL outperformance (+43% volume) provides stability, but TL remains the profit swing factor; automotive remains a headwind .
- Liquidity intact: $590M committed liquidity ($383M available) and net leverage 2.3x provide cushion to navigate the squeeze and invest in tech .
- Watch list for Q4 print: Brokerage GM% trajectory vs 12%–13% guide, any easing in buy rates, Last Mile trends into holiday, and early evidence of spot opportunities returning .
- Medium-term catalyst path: Demand normalization (housing sensitivity, rate tailwinds), sustained enforcement, and full synergy capture (buy-rate favorability toward 100 bps) could drive sharper margin inflection .
Appendix: Additional Disclosures and Press Releases
- Q3 2025 earnings press release and reconciliations (Form 8-K EX-99.1) provide detailed P&L, segment disaggregation, and non-GAAP bridges .
- Q3 2025 investor presentation outlines Q4 outlook, technology initiatives, cost actions, leverage, and liquidity .
- External legal update: Johnson Fistel announced an investigation relating to RXO on Oct 28, 2025 (third-party law firm notice) (no company response disclosed).
Notes: All figures are from company filings and transcripts unless marked with an asterisk, which denotes S&P Global consensus/actuals. Non-GAAP measures are as defined and reconciled in the company’s materials .