SB
SOUTHSIDE BANCSHARES INC (SBSI)·Q3 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q3 2025 GAAP diluted EPS was $0.16 versus $0.72 consensus, driven by a one-time $24.4M loss on restructuring ~$325M of lower-yielding AFS securities; underlying net interest income rose 2.7% q/q and NIM (FTE) was essentially flat at 2.94% (EPS miss; restructuring was the driver) .
- S&P Global consensus revenue was $70.3M* versus S&P “actual” of $42.6M*, reflecting the AFS sale loss booked in noninterest income; management’s non-GAAP “total revenue” (which adjusts for securities losses) was $70.5M, aligning more closely with consensus (revenue miss on GAAP basis; non-GAAP comparable to consensus) *.
- Balance sheet momentum: loans +$163.4M q/q (+3.5%) with ~$81M closing on 9/30; deposits +$329.6M (+5.0%) q/q; cost of total deposits decreased to 2.25% from 2.26% .
- Q4 outlook: management expects NIM to be “up slightly” and net interest income to “improve nicely,” with ~$600M CDs repricing (avg ~34 bps savings), full-quarter impact of the securities repositioning, and lower opex guided to ~$38M (positive catalyst into Q4) .
- Capital and shareholder returns: CET1 12.97%, total RBC 19.01%; buyback authorization increased by 1.0M shares (to 2.0M) on Oct 16; regular $0.36 dividend declared Nov 6 .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
What Went Well
- Loan growth accelerated: total loans +$163.4M q/q (+3.5%) with commercial real estate +$82.6M, commercial +$49.3M, construction +$49.1M; pipeline rebounded to ~$1.8B; average rate on Q3 fundings ~6.7% .
- Funding and margin setup: NIM (FTE) held at 2.94% (down 1 bp), net interest income +$1.45M q/q, and deposit costs edged down to 2.25% total; management expects Q4 NIM up slightly and NII to improve .
- Strategic repositioning: sold ~$325M of lower-yielding long-duration munis/MBS (3.28% TE yield), reinvested into higher-coupon agencies/munis; estimated payback <4 years; reduced AFS unrealized loss to $15.4M from $60.4M .
What Went Wrong
- Large one-time loss: $24.4M net loss on AFS sales drove GAAP noninterest income to -$12.0M and diluted EPS to $0.16 (down from $0.72 in Q2) .
- Asset quality optics: nonperforming assets rose to $35.6M (0.42% of assets) primarily due to a $27.5M restructured CRE loan from Q1; allowance/loans at 0.95% .
- Opex pressure earlier in the year: while Q3 opex decreased q/q (-$1.7M), prior quarters included a $1.2M branch demolition charge and higher professional fees, impacting efficiency trends .
Financial Results
Core P&L and Ratios (GAAP unless noted)
Results vs S&P Global Consensus (Quarterly)
Values with asterisks retrieved from S&P Global.
Balance Sheet and KPIs
Loan Portfolio Composition ($USD Millions)
Guidance Changes
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- “We sold approximately $325 million of lower-yielding long-duration municipal securities and, to a lesser extent, MBS… at a loss of $24.4 million… The net proceeds from these sales partially funded loan growth… We estimate the payback of this loss to be less than four years.” — CEO Lee Gibson .
- “Our tax equivalent net interest margin was 2.94%… net interest income increased $1.45 million… We expect non-interest expense to be in the $38 million range for the fourth quarter.” — CFO Julie Shamburger .
- “Third quarter new loan production totaled approximately $500 million… the pipeline… has rebounded to $1.8 billion today.” — President Keith Donahoe .
Q&A Highlights
- Margin and NII trajectory: management expects Q4 NIM “up slightly” with full impact of the securities sale, ~$125M average loan increase without new growth, and ~$600M of CDs repricing (~34 bps savings); headwind is full-quarter cost of 7% subordinated notes and 3.875% notes floating in mid-November .
- M&A and talent: evaluating potential sellers in Texas and opportunistic hiring amid out-of-state acquisitions and market disruptions .
- Buyback strategy: authorization increased; activity will be opportunistic, including potential use of 10b5-1 plans .
- Fee income outlook: trust fees expected to deliver double-digit revenue growth next year; exploring metro market expansion in wealth management for 2026 .
- DDA dynamics: recent DDA growth tied to specific enterprise business client activity; expected to moderate in Q4 .
Estimates Context
- EPS: GAAP diluted EPS $0.16 vs S&P consensus $0.7175* for Q3 2025; the difference reflects a $24.4M AFS sale loss recorded in noninterest income (non-GAAP “total revenue” adjusts for this) *.
- Revenue: S&P consensus $70.283M* vs S&P “actual” $42.636M*; company’s non-GAAP “total revenue” was $70.528M, which excludes the securities loss and is more comparable to bank revenue consensus methodologies *.
- Estimate path: Q1–Q3 2025 EPS and revenue consensus were relatively stable; target price consensus held at $32.0* across periods. Values with asterisks retrieved from S&P Global.
Key Takeaways for Investors
- The material Q3 EPS miss was primarily from a one-time $24.4M securities sale loss; underlying core trends (NII +2.7% q/q, NIM (FTE) ~flat) were constructive .
- Setup into Q4 is favorable: full-quarter benefit from repositioning, ~$600M CD repricing (~34 bps savings), and lower opex ($~38M), supporting NIM uptick and NII growth .
- Loan growth momentum and pipeline strength should support earning asset yields; average funded rates around ~6.7% provide a tailwind if payoffs moderate .
- Deposit mix and cost trends remain supportive: total deposit cost down to 2.25% and noninterest-bearing ~20.3% of deposits, with uninsured deposits 36.9% (21.7% excluding affiliate/public collateralized) .
- Capital and liquidity strong (CET1 12.97%, total RBC 19.01%, contingent liquidity $2.77B), enabling flexibility for buybacks and growth .
- Asset quality remains manageable and concentrated in a single restructured CRE credit expected to refi/right-size by year-end; allowance coverage at 0.95% of loans .
- Trading implications: near-term reaction hinges on how quickly investors look through the one-time loss to anticipated Q4 margin/NII inflection, CD repricing benefits, and lower opex; medium-term thesis emphasizes sustainable NIM expansion, fee growth (trust), and disciplined loan pricing amid competition .