SC
SPS COMMERCE INC (SPSC)·Q3 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q3 delivered mixed results: revenue of $189.9M grew 16% y/y but came in below prior guidance and S&P Global consensus, while non-GAAP EPS of $1.13 beat consensus; Adjusted EBITDA rose 25% y/y to $60.5M with margin expansion to 32% . Revenue miss reflected a ~$3M shortfall in Revenue Recovery tied to weaker Amazon 3P shipment volumes and seasonality; core Fulfillment grew ~20% y/y .
- FY25 guidance was recalibrated: revenue trimmed to $751.6–$753.6M (from $759–$763M), but non-GAAP EPS raised to $4.10–$4.15 and GAAP EPS to $2.31–$2.34; Q4 guide implies 13–14% y/y growth and in-line non-GAAP EPS .
- Management flagged ongoing invoice scrutiny/delayed purchases and the push-out of several large enablement programs from Q4 into 1H26 (pressuring one-time testing/certification revenue near-term) .
- Capital allocation and 2026 outlook are key stock catalysts: $100M new buyback authorized effective Dec 1, 2025; initial 2026 framework calls for 7–8% organic growth (ex-M&A) and +200 bps adjusted EBITDA margin expansion, underscoring durable profitability despite demand headwinds .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
-
What Went Well
- Non-GAAP profitability outperformed: non-GAAP EPS of $1.13 and Adjusted EBITDA of $60.5M (+25% y/y) with 32% margin, aided by onboarding efficiency and gross margin improvement .
- Fulfillment momentum: CEO cited ~20% y/y growth in the Fulfillment business and strong net adds (+450 customers; ~54,950 total) with ARPU ~$13,300 .
- Strategic positioning and AI leverage: “We provide unmatched value in the data that powers AI-driven use cases, and a unique, network-led growth motion,” noted the CEO, highlighting network data as an AI advantage rather than a threat .
-
What Went Wrong
- Revenue shortfall vs expectations: Revenue Recovery underperformed by ~$3M due to Amazon 3P shipment weakness and greater-than-expected seasonality after a Q2 Prime Day boost .
- Demand friction: Ongoing invoice scrutiny and delayed purchases among suppliers, and several retailer enablement programs pushed from Q4 to 1H26 (reducing one-time testing/certification fees in Q4) .
- FY revenue trim and near-term decel: FY25 revenue guidance reduced to $751.6–$753.6M (from $759–$763M), reflecting the above dynamics despite resilient core profitability .
Financial Results
Selected KPIs
Results vs S&P Global Consensus (Q3 2025)
- Values retrieved from S&P Global.
Additional Business Color (Q3)
- Fulfillment revenue grew ~20% y/y; revenue recovery lagged plan by ~$3M due to Amazon 3P shipment dynamics and seasonality .
Guidance Changes
Q4 2025 Guidance vs S&P Global Consensus
- Values retrieved from S&P Global.
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- “We provide unmatched value in the data that powers AI-driven use cases, and a unique, network-led growth motion.” — Chad Collins, CEO .
- “Adjusted EBITDA margin expansion is driven by improvements in gross margin and operating efficiencies… onboarding to the network has become much more efficient.” — Management .
- “Several large enablement campaigns were pushed from Q4 into the first half of 2026… we expect a decline in one-time revenue from testing and certification fees.” — CFO .
- “Revenue recovery… came in approximately $3 million below our expectations in Q3” due to Amazon 3P shipment dynamics and seasonality. — CEO .
- Initial 2026 outlook: “deliver revenue growth… approximately 7% to 8%,” with “adjusted EBITDA margin expansion of 2 percentage points.” — CFO .
Q&A Highlights
- Revenue Recovery headwinds: Visibility on Amazon 3P shipment softness came late in Q3; resulted in ~$3M revenue shortfall; Q4 similarly impacted; 1P more stable and more strategic .
- Demand environment: Continued invoice scrutiny and delayed purchases among suppliers; several retailer programs shifted to 1H26, mainly affecting one-time certification revenue in Q4 .
- 2026 framework: 7–8% organic revenue growth and +200 bps adjusted EBITDA margin expansion; cross-sell in revenue recovery expected to outgrow core in 2026 .
- Customer metrics: Net adds of ~450 in Q3; total recurring customers ~54,950; ARPU ~$13,300; 3P customer count down ~150 in Q3; Carbon6 added ~8,500 customers at close .
- AI and competitive posture: AI not displacing SPS; network breadth and data are difficult to replicate and support customers’ AI strategies; pricing based on connections (not seats) seen as more durable .
Estimates Context
- Q3 2025 vs S&P Global consensus: Revenue $189.9M vs $192.7M* (miss); non-GAAP EPS $1.13 vs $1.00* (beat) .
- Q4 2025 guide vs S&P Global consensus: Revenue $192.7–$194.7M vs $193.6M* (in line); non-GAAP EPS $0.98–$1.02 vs $1.008* (in line) .
- Implications: Expect near-term estimate revisions with lower FY revenue but higher EPS/non-GAAP EPS from operating leverage and lower SBC/depreciation .
- Values retrieved from S&P Global.
Key Takeaways for Investors
- The quarter’s narrative: modest top-line miss concentrated in Revenue Recovery (Amazon 3P) but stronger-than-expected margins and non-GAAP EPS driven by efficiency gains; Fulfillment remains robust .
- FY25 reset: lower revenue but higher non-GAAP and GAAP EPS guidance; Q4 outlook is broadly in line with consensus — reduces downside risk into year-end .
- Near-term caution: invoice scrutiny and enablement timing shifts weigh on one-time revenue; watch Q4 one-time certification fees and early 2026 ramp .
- Medium-term durability: initial 2026 guide (7–8% organic growth; +200 bps adj. EBITDA margin) underscores profitability resilience and network-driven cross-sell opportunities (especially 1P) .
- Structural moat: AI enhances SPS’s value proposition given proprietary network data and connection-based pricing; displacement risk appears low per management/customer signals .
- Capital returns: $100M buyback authorization gives downside support; company repurchased $30M in Q3 and intends to utilize programs over time .
- Watch list: trajectory of Revenue Recovery (3P vs 1P mix), mid-market ERP activity (onboarding catalysts), analytics stabilization, and gross margin progression from onboarding efficiency .