Sign in

Jennifer K. Schott

Executive Vice President, Chief Legal Officer & Secretary at SYY
Executive

About Jennifer K. Schott

Executive Vice President, Chief Legal Officer & Secretary at Sysco since 2025; age 52. Prior roles include Deputy General Counsel & Assistant Corporate Secretary at Caterpillar (2019–2021) and Senior Vice President, General Counsel & Secretary at Illinois Tool Works (2021–2025) . Sysco’s FY25 performance context under her tenure: revenue $81.4B (+3.2% YoY), adjusted operating income $3.5B, adjusted EPS $4.46; the company returned ~$2.3B via dividends and repurchases . Company PSU payout for the FY23–FY25 cycle was 56.14%, with relative TSR at the 25.2nd percentile vs. S&P 500, signaling incentive sensitivity to shareholder returns .

Past Roles

OrganizationRoleYearsStrategic impact
Caterpillar Inc.Deputy General Counsel & Assistant Corporate Secretary2019–2021Senior legal leadership for a global industrial; board/secretary function exposure .
Illinois Tool Works Inc.Senior Vice President, General Counsel & Secretary2021–2025Led corporate legal and governance; signed multiple SEC filings as corporate officer .
Discover Financial ServicesVice President, Assistant General Counsel & Assistant Secretary2016Corporate legal and disclosure; SEC signatory on 8‑K .

External Roles

No public company board service disclosed in Sysco’s FY25 10‑K executive officer profiles or 2025 proxy; filings list Schott solely in her Sysco officer capacity (including as signing Corporate Secretary for the proxy/meeting notice) .

Performance Compensation

Company incentive architecture relevant to EVPs:

  • Annual Incentive Plan (AIP) metrics and FY25 design (70% financial, 30% strategic) .
  • Long-Term Incentive Plan (LTIP) components: PSUs (50%), RSUs (30%), Stock Options (20%); PSU metrics over three years: adjusted EPS (37.5%), ROIC (37.5%), revenue growth (25%), with a ±25% relative TSR modifier vs. S&P 500; PSUs cliff-vest at end of the 3-year period; RSUs and options vest ratably over three years; options have 10‑year expirations .
FY25 AIP Financial MeasuresWeightThresholdTargetMaxActualPayout vs Target
Operating Income (adj., $B)50%3.516 3.742 3.899 3.523 51.52%
Sales Revenue ($B)20%80.421 83.181 85.152 81.370 67.19%
FY25 AIP Strategic ObjectivesWeightThresholdTargetMaxActualPayout vs Target
Local Case Growth10%0.50% 4.00% 6.00% 0.60% 51.40%
USBL Cost per Piece10%103% of Target 100% 97% of Target 102% 70.00%
Engagement Improvement (removed for FY26)10%-1% 1% 3% 2% 150.00%
LTIP PSU DesignMetric weightingVestingTSR modifier
Adjusted EPS37.5% 3‑year cliff ±25% vs. S&P 500 (25th/75th percentile)
ROIC37.5% 3‑year cliff ±25%
Revenue growth25% 3‑year cliff ±25%

Notes:

  • FY26 AIP sharpened focus to operating income (45%) and sales revenue (25%); SBOs now USB cost per piece (15%) and local case growth (15%) .
  • FY23 PSU cycle certified at 56.14% aggregate payout; relative TSR at 25.2nd percentile implied -23.20% TSR modifier .

Equity Ownership & Alignment

  • Stock ownership guidelines: CEO 7x salary; Executive Vice Presidents 4x; Senior Vice Presidents 2x; five-year compliance window; retention requirements for option exercises and vested RSUs/PSUs to support compliance .
  • Hedging and pledging prohibited; executives must trade only via pre-approved Rule 10b5‑1 plans with SEC cooling-off compliance; trading blackout windows enforced; pre-approval committee includes the Board Chair, Governance Committee Chair, and the Chief Legal Officer (Schott) .
  • Section 16(a) reporting: company states timely filings by executive officers and directors for FY25 .
  • Aggregate beneficial ownership for all directors and executive officers (19 persons): 2,677,308 shares, ~0.56% of outstanding; individual breakdowns are disclosed for directors and NEOs only .
Ownership & Trading PolicyRequirement
EVP stock ownership4x base salary
Hedging/PledgingProhibited
Trading mechanics10b5‑1 only; blackout windows; pre-approval; SEC cooling-off periods

Employment Terms

Sysco standardized severance arrangements for Executive Vice Presidents; change-in-control uses a double-trigger (CIC + qualifying termination within 12 months before/24 months after CIC) .

Scenario (EVP)Cash severanceAIP treatmentHealth benefitsOutplacement
Non‑CIC termination without Cause / resignation for Good Reason2x base salary Pro‑rated AIP based on actual performance; paid with other execs COBRA premium reimbursement above active rates for 18 months Up to 12 months
CIC termination without Cause / resignation for Good Reason2x (base salary + target AIP) Pro‑rated AIP based on actual performance; paid with other execs COBRA premium reimbursement above active rates for 18 months Up to 12 months

Additional protections:

  • Protective Covenants Agreement required for equity awards: non-compete/solicit, confidentiality; violations can forfeit equity/SERP/EDCP/MSP benefits .
  • Clawbacks: incentive compensation recoverable for restatements or misconduct causing material financial/reputational harm; Dodd-Frank clawback policy adopted per NYSE/SEC rules .

Compensation Governance Context

ItemFYData
Say‑on‑Pay approval202393.37%
Say‑on‑Pay approval202493.80%

Compensation Peer Group (FY25 benchmarking): companies across logistics/distribution, consumer products, retail; Sysco sits ~53rd percentile market cap and ~58th percentile revenue vs. peers .

CompanyMarket Cap ($MM)Revenue ($MM)Employees
Aramark9,883 17,545 266,680
ADM24,176 85,530 43,213
Bunge10,857 53,108 23,000
Costco406,731 258,805 333,000
Dollar General16,675 40,166 194,200
Dollar Tree16,115 13,933 139,572
FedEx67,759 87,393 405,000
Kimberly-Clark43,700 20,058 38,000
Kroger44,249 149,879 409,000
Loblaw56,955 42,333 220,000
Lowe’s139,356 83,722 215,500
Performance Food Group13,173 56,501 42,785
Target61,941 107,570 440,000
Tyson Foods20,459 53,613 138,000
UPS107,610 91,070 372,180
US Foods15,714 37,877 30,000
Walgreens8,056 150,410 252,500
Yum! Brands37,440 7,549 40,000
Sysco37,559 80,570 75,000

Equity Ownership & Compensation Tables (Schott-specific)

  • Sysco’s proxy discloses individual beneficial ownership for directors and NEOs; Jennifer K. Schott (EVP, Chief Legal Officer & Secretary) is not a named executive officer in FY25, and her individual ownership and compensation figures are not disclosed in the proxy tables reviewed .
  • Security ownership for “All Directors and Executive Officers as a Group (19 persons)” is provided for context (2,677,308 shares; 0.56%) .

Governance & Trading Policies (pressure and alignment)

  • Stock trading: executive officers must use pre‑approved Rule 10b5‑1 plans; hedging/pledging prohibited, which mitigates forced selling or collateral-driven pressure and strengthens alignment .
  • Equity vesting cadence: RSUs/options vest ratably; PSUs cliff-vest after three years, focusing retention and long-term performance; no dividend equivalents paid unless awards are earned .

Risk Indicators & Red Flags

  • Related party transactions: the Board reviewed transactions since June 30, 2024 and determined none required disclosure under SEC rules .
  • Clawbacks: robust policies for restatements and misconduct; Dodd‑Frank-compliant clawback adopted .
  • Trading risk controls: blackout windows and pre-approval requirements reduce opportunistic trading risk; hedging/pledging bans reduce misalignment .
  • Say‑on‑Pay support has been strong, indicating investor acceptance of pay structure and alignment (93.37% in 2023; 93.80% in 2024) .

Employment Terms

ClauseDetail
Double‑trigger CICCIC + qualifying termination required for accelerated vesting; aligned across LTIP/MSP/SERP/EDCP; 280G best‑net cutbacks referenced in change‑in‑control quantification for certain NEOs (policy framework) .
Protective covenantsNon‑compete/solicit, confidentiality; equity and plan benefits subject to forfeiture upon violation .
Severance (EVP standard)See table above; structured to avoid negotiations and support retention while maintaining pay-for-performance .

Investment Implications

  • Alignment: As Chief Legal Officer, Schott enforces trading, hedging, and ownership policies that materially reduce pledging/hedging risks and enforce Rule 10b5‑1 discipline—positive for insider-trading governance and reduced selling pressure .
  • Retention: EVP-standard severance with double‑trigger CIC and long‑dated, performance‑sensitive equity (3‑year PSU cliff; 3‑year RSU/option ratable vesting) supports retention while tying realized pay to operating income, revenue, EPS, ROIC, and TSR outcomes .
  • Execution risk: FY25 AIP paid ~66% at company level, PSUs certified at 56.14% for FY23 cycle—signals disciplined calibration of incentives to performance; governance and clawback frameworks mitigate adverse behavior risks .
  • Data gaps: Her specific base salary, bonus targets, grants, and individual ownership are not disclosed as she was not an FY25 NEO; ongoing monitoring of Section 16 filings and future proxies is warranted to track any insider selling pressure or changes in compensation alignment .

Best AI for Equity Research

Performance on expert-authored financial analysis tasks

Fintool-v490%
Claude Sonnet 4.555.3%
o348.3%
GPT 546.9%
Grok 440.3%
Qwen 3 Max32.7%

Best AI for Equity Research

Performance on expert-authored financial analysis tasks

Fintool-v490%
Claude Sonnet 4.555.3%
o348.3%
GPT 546.9%
Grok 440.3%
Qwen 3 Max32.7%