Jaspar Weir
About Jaspar Weir
Jaspar Weir is TaskUs’ Co‑Founder (2008), President (since 2008), and a Class II director (since October 2018). He holds a Bachelor's degree from the University of Southern California and is described as focusing on transformational growth and corporate development; age 39 as of the 2025 proxy record date . Company performance during his ongoing tenure includes 2024 revenue of $995.0M, Adjusted EBITDA of $209.9M (21.1% margin), and exiting Q4 2024 with 17% YoY revenue growth . TSR metrics were not disclosed in the proxy.
Past Roles
| Organization | Role | Years | Strategic Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| TaskUs | Co‑Founder | 2008–present | Co‑founded the company and has led transformational growth initiatives . |
| TaskUs | President | 2008–present | Leads transformational growth and corporate development . |
| TaskUs Board | Director (Class II) | 2018–present | Non‑independent director; governance influence as Co‑Founder . |
External Roles
| Organization | Role | Years | Strategic Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| None disclosed | — | — | TaskUs disclosures list no other current or prior public company boards for Weir in past five years . |
Fixed Compensation
- The company provides scaled executive compensation disclosure as an Emerging Growth Company (EGC); Weir’s specific compensation (base salary, bonus, equity grant values) is not included in the named executive officer tables and was not disclosed .
- Company program structure (context): base salary; Annual Incentive Plan (AIP); and long‑term equity incentives (RSUs and PSUs). The Compensation Committee (with an independent consultant) emphasizes pay‑for‑performance alignment and majority performance‑based incentives for executives .
Performance Compensation
- Company AIP design for 2024 used revenue and Adjusted EBITDA percentage as the performance metrics, with payout curves by achievement bands; actual 2024 results were $995.0M revenue and 21.1% Adjusted EBITDA margin. AIP payout mechanics and realized payouts were disclosed for other NEOs; Weir’s AIP participation/payouts were not disclosed .
| Metric | Weighting | Target Calibration | 2024 Actual | Payout Mechanics |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue ($M) | Not disclosed for Weir | Threshold <900; graduated bands at ≥900, ≥915, ≥930, ≥950, ≥970, ≥990 | $995.0 | Payout range scaled by revenue band and EBITDA %; specifics for Weir not disclosed . |
| Adjusted EBITDA % | Not disclosed for Weir | Bands at ≥21.6%, ≥22.1%, ≥22.6%, ≥23.1%, ≥23.6% | 21.1% | Payout range 0–200% depending on combined grid; Weir’s payout not disclosed . |
| Long‑term equity (RSUs/PSUs) | Not disclosed for Weir | RSUs generally vest 33%/33%/34% annually over 3 years; PSUs used by company with stock price or financial metrics; executive‑level award structures and change‑in‑control double‑trigger terms disclosed generally . | Not applicable | Company‑level design; Weir’s specific grants/vesting not disclosed . |
Equity Ownership & Alignment
- TaskUs is a controlled company: Blackstone funds plus Co‑Founders Bryce Maddock and Jaspar Weir collectively hold ~97.5% of combined voting power (ten‑vote Class B vs one‑vote Class A), enabling control of stockholder matters while the Class B remains ≥9.1% of total shares .
- Securities trading policy prohibits directors and officers from hedging or pledging company stock, and from purchasing on margin or borrowing against accounts holding company securities, reinforcing alignment and reducing forced‑sale risk .
| Ownership Detail | Amount | % / Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Class A shares beneficially owned | 1,530,188 | 7.4% of Class A |
| Class B shares beneficially owned | 11,451,107 | 16.4% of Class B |
| Total voting power | — | 16.1% of combined voting power |
| Direct Class A held of record | 873,900 | Included in Class A total |
| Indirect holdings via trusts | Weir 2015 Irrevocable: 5,623,190; Weir Family Trust: 5,221,267; Weir 2015 Exempt Irrevocable: 606,650 | Included in beneficial ownership totals |
| Options/RSUs exercisable/vesting within 60 days | 656,288 | Included in beneficial ownership (within 60 days) |
| Hedging/Pledging | Prohibited for directors/officers by policy | Alignment positive; reduces leverage‑driven selling pressure |
Employment Terms
- Weir’s individual employment agreement, severance, non‑compete, non‑solicit, and change‑of‑control terms were not disclosed in the proxy’s employment agreements section (which covered CEO, CCO, and COO only) .
- Historical Stockholders Agreement provisions: Co‑Founders and Sponsor have designation rights and certain approval rights; early transfer restrictions applied to Co‑Founders until the third anniversary of the IPO (June 2024). Sponsor‑related pledge cooperation applies to Sponsor, not to directors/officers under the company’s trading policy .
Board Governance
- Board class and term: Weir is a Class II director; current term expires at the 2026 Annual Meeting .
- Independence and committees: Weir is a non‑independent director and, per the committee matrix, is not shown as a member of Audit, Compensation, or Nominating & ESG committees .
- Dual‑role implications: The CEO (Bryce Maddock) also serves as Chair; the board appoints a Lead Independent Director (Jill Greenthal) with defined authorities to mitigate concentration of power and ensure independent oversight . TaskUs qualifies as a Nasdaq “controlled company” and may rely on certain governance exemptions, though a majority of directors are independent .
| Board Service | Class | Director Since | Term Expires | Independence | Committees |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TaskUs Board | II | 2018 | 2026 | Not independent | None indicated |
Director Compensation
- Executive directors (Maddock and Weir) are not separately compensated for board service (no director retainer or director equity awards) .
Performance & Track Record (Company context)
- 2024 results: revenue $995.0M; Adjusted EBITDA $209.9M (21.1% margin); 39 new clients in 2024; ~200 clients at year‑end; multiple industry “Leader” recognitions (Trust & Safety; Financial Crime & Compliance; Data Annotation) .
- Strategic focus: expanding AI‑driven services and complex, regulated verticals; taking share via operational excellence; documented in shareholder letter .
Related Party & Control Considerations
- Controlled company: dual‑class structure and combined control by Blackstone and Co‑Founders confer ongoing approval rights over certain actions (issuances, amendments, extraordinary transactions) and board designation rights, potentially affecting governance independence and strategic optionality .
- Ordinary‑course transactions with Blackstone affiliates: $0.8M paid for products/services and $9.3M revenue recognized from Blackstone‑affiliated entities in 2024; reviewed under related‑party policies .
Risk Indicators & Signals
- Hedging/pledging ban for insiders reduces leverage‑related trading risks .
- Take‑private process terminated: An October 2025 special meeting did not approve the proposed merger; the merger agreement was mutually terminated without a fee. This outcome affects near‑term event arbitrage and ownership trajectory .
Investment Implications
- Alignment: Weir’s substantial beneficial ownership and 16.1% voting power indicate strong economic and voting alignment with shareholders; the anti‑hedging/pledging policy further reduces misalignment risks .
- Governance: Non‑independent director status, co‑founder role, and controlled company structure concentrate influence. The presence of a Lead Independent Director and majority‑independent board are mitigating factors, but committee non‑membership limits Weir’s formal oversight roles .
- Compensation visibility: Limited EGC disclosure for Weir constrains pay‑for‑performance analysis; however, company‑wide incentive designs center on revenue and Adjusted EBITDA metrics with multi‑year RSU/PSU structures, suggesting performance linkage at the executive level .
- Event risk: The terminated take‑private process removes near‑term M&A catalysts; continued focus on AI services, diversified verticals, and operating efficiency are key levers for value creation under the current control structure .