Sign in
Gregory Smith

Gregory Smith

President and Chief Executive Officer at TERADYNETERADYNE
CEO
Executive
Board

About Gregory Smith

Gregory S. Smith, age 62, is Teradyne’s President, Chief Executive Officer, and a director (director since 2023). He joined Teradyne in 2006 after early career roles at Raytheon and has led Teradyne’s Semiconductor Test and Robotics businesses before becoming CEO, bringing 18 years of internal leadership across engineering and P&L roles . Under Smith’s leadership, 2024 revenue was $2.82 billion (+~5% YoY), GAAP EPS rose ~22% to $3.32, and non-GAAP EPS increased ~10% to $3.22, supported by +8.5% growth in Semiconductor Test and $672 million in operating cash flow with $474 million in free cash flow . For long-term incentives, 2022 PSUs paid at 50% of target (PBIT achieved 23% = 100% payout; relative TSR -39.6% vs NYSE Composite = 0%), evidencing rigorous pay-for-performance alignment . Recent execution highlights include AI-driven demand in compute and memory and strategic technology M&A (e.g., Quantifi Photonics) positioning Teradyne for optical interconnect test and advanced packaging opportunities .

Past Roles

OrganizationRoleYearsStrategic Impact
TeradynePresident, RoboticsOct 2020–Jul 2023Led robotics portfolio repositioning and product initiatives amid industrial automation softness .
TeradynePresident, Semiconductor TestFeb 2016–Oct 2020Drove diversification of customer base and growth in core SOC/memory test solutions .
RaytheonTest Engineer (early career)Pre-2006Foundation in complex test systems engineering prior to joining Teradyne .

External Roles

OrganizationRoleYearsNotes
Technoprobe S.p.A.DirectorMay 2024–presentPublic company directorship in semiconductor test ecosystem .

Fixed Compensation

Metric20232024
Base Salary ($)$850,000 $925,000
Target Variable Cash (% of base)125% 125%

Performance Compensation

2024 Variable Cash Program – Metrics and Outcomes (CEO)

MetricWeightingThresholdTargetMaximumActualPayout Result
Two-year Rolling Revenue Growth29.25% -6% 7% 19% -5.70% 3%
PBIT (non-GAAP)19.5% 11% 21% 39% 20.4% 95%
Vital Goals (weighted avg of divisional goals)48.75% N/AN/AN/AN/A136%
Gender Representation (US/global YoY change)2.5% >24.7%/>19% 24.8%/19.1% N/A24.9%/21.0% 200%
Total Variable Cash Payout vs Target91%
CEO Variable Cash Outcome (2024)Value
Target ($)$1,156,250
Payout (% of target)91%
Actual Payout ($)$1,052,188
CEO Profit Sharing (2024)H1H2Total
Pro rata % of model cash comp7.664% 9.520%
Profit sharing distribution ($)$159,507 $198,135 $357,642

2024 Equity Awards (granted Feb 1, 2024) – Mix, Terms, and Grant Values

Award TypeShares/OptionsVestingGrant Value ($)
Performance-based RSUs (target)58,3363-year cliff; 50% TSR vs NYSE Composite; 50% 3-year cumulative PBIT; 0–200% payout $5,711,969
Time-based RSUs29,1684-year ratable annual vesting $2,775,044
Stock Options24,6674-year ratable; 7-year term $925,013
Total$9,412,026

PSU Performance Realization (2012–2024 Cycle Determined Jan 2025)

MetricTarget StructureActual PerformancePayout
Relative TSR vs NYSE Composite50% of award; 0–200% scale-39.6% vs Index (underperformed) 0%
3-year cumulative PBIT50% of award; thresholds 10%/23%/34%23.0% 100%
Total PSU Payout50% of target
CEO shares earned4,014

Program Design Notes and Governance

  • 2024 changes reduced PBIT weighting (from 30% to 19.5%) and increased Vital Goals weighting (from 40% to 48.75%); thresholds for revenue and PBIT set at 10th/50th/90th percentile vs “VC Comparison Group” (S&P 500, peer group, and select semis) to maintain rigor .
  • Executive compensation practices include double-trigger CIC, clawback per SEC/Nasdaq, robust ownership guidelines, no options repricing/cash-outs, and no excise tax gross-ups .

Equity Ownership & Alignment

Ownership ItemDetail
Beneficial ownership (Mar 14, 2025)65,640 shares; <1% of outstanding (160,832,506 shares) .
Shares acquirable within 60 days28,167 (includes options/RSUs per footnote) .
Anti-hedging/anti-pledgingHedging and pledging prohibited for directors/executives; 10b5-1 trading plans required for insiders .
Executive stock ownership guidelinesCEO 3x base salary, increased to 6x starting 2025; 5-year compliance window; CEO has until Jan 2030 to meet updated level .
Compliance status (2024 year-end)NEOs were at/above guidelines except Kumar (until Aug 2028) and Driscoll (until Jan 2029) .
Tax withholding on vestingCompany withholds shares to satisfy minimum taxes on RSU vesting; mechanical supply impact vs open-market selling .

CEO Outstanding Equity at 12/31/2024 (selected items)

InstrumentStatusStrikeExpirationQty
Stock options (granted 2021)Exercisable$113.4801/29/282,459; 820 unexercisable
Stock options (granted 2022)50/50$112.1201/28/291,923 exerc.; 1,923 unexerc.
Stock options (granted 2023)Partially unexercisable$103.4401/27/304,584 exerc.; 13,754 unexerc.
Stock options (granted 2024)Unexercisable$95.1402/01/3124,667
Time-based RSUs (unvested)Ratable vest29,168 ($3,695,586 MV)
PSUs (2023 grant in progress)In progress43,504 ($5,511,957 MV)
PSUs (2024 grant in progress)In progress58,336 ($7,391,171 MV)

Note: Market values reflect proxy table presentation at FY-end and are not a recommendation to transact .

Employment Terms

ProvisionKey Terms
CEO Severance Agreement (non-CIC)2 years of model compensation (salary + target variable), 2 years continued vesting of time-based equity, 3 years continued vesting of PSUs, 2 years health coverage; subject to release and 3-year post-employment non-compete/non-solicit .
Change-in-Control AgreementsDouble-trigger; 2 years of model compensation, prorated target cash incentive for year, full accelerated vesting of equity (PSUs at target), 2 years health coverage; no excise tax gross-up .
Retirement Vesting PolicyIf ≥ age 60 and ≥10 years service, PSUs vest based on actual performance at determination; if ≥65 and ≥10 years service, continued vesting of unvested time-based RSUs/options per Executive Retirement Policy (Jan 2024), subject to post-employment obligations .
Clawback PolicyRecoupment of performance-based cash/equity upon financial restatement compliant with SEC/Nasdaq standards .
Insider Trading PolicyMandatory Rule 10b5-1 plans; blackout periods; prohibition of hedging/derivatives and pledging/margin accounts .

Board Governance and Service

  • Board service: Smith is an executive director since 2023; he is not on any Board committees; committee membership is entirely independent directors .
  • Dual-role implications: Teradyne separates Chair/CEO; Paul Tufano serves as independent Chair since May 2021, mitigating CEO-chair consolidation risks; independent directors hold executive sessions at each meeting .
  • Attendance: The Board met four times in 2024; directors averaged 100% attendance; all then-serving directors attended the 2024 Annual Meeting .
  • Director pay: Employee directors do not receive Board compensation; non-employee director pay includes cash retainers and annual RSUs with anti-hedging/pledging and 5x retainer ownership guidelines .

Performance & Track Record

  • Strategic initiatives: Smith emphasized AI-driven test demand and acquisitions to strengthen optical and silicon photonics test capabilities (Quantifi Photonics), and roadmap acceleration (e.g., power semiconductors via Infineon deal) .
  • Execution: Q3’25 revenue $769M (Semiconductor Test $606M) with AI-related demand expected to drive a 25% sequential sales increase in Q4’25; guidance implies continued EPS expansion .
  • Robotics: Repositioning toward logistics/pharma/semiconductor/electronics amid weak macro in Europe auto/metal machining; expects meaningful revenue contribution in 2027 .

Compensation Peer Group, Say-on-Pay, and Shareholder Feedback

  • Peer group: 17-peer benchmarking (e.g., Cadence, KLA, Keysight, Rockwell, Microchip, ON, Fortive, etc.); Teradyne was below median in revenue and market cap; awards targeted near the 50th percentile .
  • VC Comparison Group for variable cash: thresholds set vs broad comp set at 10th/50th/90th percentiles for revenue growth and PBIT goals to maintain rigor .
  • Say-on-Pay: ~89% approval at 2024 Annual Meeting; reflects shareholder support for program; Committee made targeted adjustments for 2024 (e.g., metric weighting) .

Equity Ownership & Alignment Details

TopicGovernance/Policy
Ownership guidelines (executives)CEO 6x base salary starting 2025; 5-year transition, 50% net shares retention until compliant; excludes unvested RSUs/PSUs and unexercised options; CEO has until Jan 2030 to comply .
Hedging/PledgingProhibited for all employees/directors; aligns risk and reduces misaligned liquidity actions .
RepricingProhibited without shareholder approval .

Employment & Contracts – Additional Notes

TopicDetails
401(k), ESPP, Supplemental SavingsBroad-based participation; ESPP at 15% discount; Supplemental Savings Plan for IRC limits .
No excise tax gross-upsShareholder-friendly CIC design .
Equity grant timing policyNo grants during filing windows; avoids timing around MNPI; annual grants in Q1 .

Investment Implications

  • Pay-for-performance alignment is strong: PSU results show zero payout on TSR underperformance and 100% payout on PBIT achievement, with net 50% payout; 2024 variable cash paid 91% of target, reflecting tougher revenue growth vs strong PBIT and vital goals .
  • Insider selling pressure appears contained: mandatory 10b5-1 plans, anti-pledging, and share withholding for taxes on vesting reduce discretionary selling; however, notable vesting and option expiry cadence through 2026–2031 warrants monitoring for routine settlement-related supply .
  • Retention and succession risk mitigated: rigorous severance/CIC terms with non-compete/non-solicit, retirement vesting policy for long-tenured executives, and independent Chair structure limit governance risk from dual roles .
  • Execution upside tied to AI cycle: CEO commentary and Q3’25 results suggest continued momentum in AI-related test demand (compute/memory/networking); watch PSU TSR modifier into 2026 and incremental design wins that could improve TSR-based outcomes .
  • Governance quality: strong policies (clawback, no repricing/gross-ups, independent committees, robust ownership guidelines) and shareholder support (~89% Say-on-Pay) lower compensation/governance overhangs .