TARGET CORP (TGT) Q1 2026 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q1 2026 printed mixed results: Net Sales $23.85B (-2.8% YoY), GAAP EPS $2.27 boosted by $0.97 interchange litigation benefit; Adjusted EPS $1.30, with comps down 3.8% on weaker traffic and higher markdowns .
- Versus S&P Global consensus, revenue missed ($23.85B vs $24.35B*) and Adjusted EPS missed ($1.30 vs $1.65*), while GAAP EPS superficially “beat” due to the one-time $0.97 credit; management emphasized the Adjusted view as the better measure of ongoing profitability .
- Guidance was lowered: from Q4 2025’s FY2025 EPS $8.80–$9.80 and ~1% sales growth to FY2025 GAAP EPS $8–$10, Adjusted $7–$9 and a low-single-digit sales decline; the “Enterprise Acceleration Office” was launched to speed execution amid tariff uncertainty and soft discretionary demand .
- Key near-term catalysts include the acceleration office, strong limited-time “kate spade for Target” collaboration, and Target Circle 360’s same-day delivery expansion with no price markups across Shipt’s marketplace; risks include tariffs, inventory rightsizing costs, and continued discretionary softness .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
-
What Went Well
- Same-day delivery surged ~36% YoY, with mid-single digit first-party digital growth and continued Drive Up strength; management highlighted benefits flowing to Roundel and Target Plus from rising digital engagement .
- Inventory shrink improved materially, contributing ~120 bps of gross margin favorability; management expects “vast majority” of prior shrink headwinds to be clawed back over the year .
- Designer collaboration performance: kate spade drove Target’s strongest limited-time partnership in a decade, evidencing consumer receptivity to style-forward value propositions (“Tar-zhay magic”) .
-
What Went Wrong
- Topline softness: comps -3.8% with traffic -2.4% and average ticket -1.4%, driven by discretionary weakness and higher markdowns to rightsize inventory; gross margin fell ~60 bps YoY .
- Stores underperformed (store-originated comps -5.7%), partially offset by digital comps +4.7%; SG&A rate ex-settlement deleveraged to 21.7% on lower sales and team investments .
- Tariff uncertainty and demand elasticity risks: management expects to offset the “vast majority” of tariffs via sourcing diversification and vendor negotiation, but still lowered FY2025 Adjusted EPS guidance to $7–$9 amid heightened macro/tariff headwinds .
Financial Results
Notes: Q1 2026 GAAP EPS includes $0.97 benefit from interchange fee settlements; Adjusted EPS excludes this item . SG&A and operating margin rates include settlement gains in Q1, with ex-settlement SG&A rate 21.7% .
Actual vs S&P Global Consensus
Values with asterisks retrieved from S&P Global.
Segment Breakdown – Q1 2026 (Net Sales by Category)
Key KPIs (Channel Mix, Fulfillment, ROIC)
Guidance Changes
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- Strategy and tone: “We’re not satisfied with current performance…we announced the establishment of a multi-year acceleration office…to drive long-term profitable growth” .
- Demand signals: “Mid-single-digit growth in our first-party digital business…36% growth in same-day delivery…continued healthy growth in Drive Up” .
- Tariff mitigation: “We feel that we can offset the vast majority of the tariff impact” through sourcing diversification and vendor partnerships; China exposure in own brands down from ~60% in 2017 to ~30%, targeting <25% by end of next year .
- Operating disciplines: “Average click to deliver speed was nearly 20% faster…we fulfilled more than 70% of all Q1 digital orders within a day” .
- Profit drivers and headwinds: Gross margin pressured by merchandising (markdowns) and digital fulfillment costs, partially offset by lower shrink; Adjusted EPS $1.30 vs $2.03 last year after removing $0.97 litigation benefit .
Q&A Highlights
- Comps and margin cadence: Management expects low-single-digit sales declines through the balance of FY2025, with inventory and receipt adjustment costs largely first-half weighted; shrink tailwinds should persist, recapturing most of prior headwinds .
- Tariffs and pricing: Guidance ($7–$9 Adjusted EPS) embeds tariff uncertainty and aims to mitigate most impacts without resorting to price hikes; pricing elasticity and markdown risk acknowledged .
- In-store traffic and value positioning: Focus on retail fundamentals (in-stocks, service), style-forward value, and seasonal moments to drive traffic; price gaps viewed as comfortable; expanding Target Circle 360 benefits (no markups across >100 Shipt retailers) to reinforce value .
- Guidance risk framing: Wider Adjusted EPS range reflects economic and tariff uncertainty; tailwinds from shrink/productivity provide “oxygen” to keep investing .
Estimates Context
- Q1 2026 vs consensus: Revenue $23.85B vs $24.35B* (miss), Adjusted EPS $1.30 vs $1.65* (miss), GAAP EPS $2.27 (beat due to $0.97 one-time benefit) .
- Prior quarters: Q3 2025 revenue $25.67B vs $25.90B*, EPS $1.85 vs $2.30* (miss); Q4 2025 revenue $30.92B vs $30.84B*, EPS $2.41 vs $2.25* (beat) .
Values with asterisks retrieved from S&P Global.
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Near-term setup: Expect continued topline pressure and inventory adjustment costs in H1, but shrink recovery and cost discipline are credible offsets; reduced FY2025 Adjusted EPS range ($7–$9) now reflects tariff scenarios and macro uncertainty .
- Read-through on quality of earnings: Focus on Adjusted EPS ($1.30) rather than GAAP ($2.27) given the $0.97 interchange settlement; margin headwinds centered on markdowns and digital fulfillment costs despite shrink relief .
- Execution catalyst: The Enterprise Acceleration Office and explicit technology/AI focus aim to improve speed, inventory processes, and fulfillment efficiency—watch for tangible KPIs (delivery speed, same-day mix, in-stock levels) in coming quarters .
- Digital-led monetization: Continued growth in Roundel and Target Plus supports margin mix; Circle 360’s no-markup expansion across Shipt’s marketplace may drive membership engagement and basket consolidation .
- Merchandising proof points: Limited-time collabs (kate spade) and seasonal events show demand can be activated in discretionary categories via style + value; monitor the summer “100 days” and back-to-school execution .
- Risk monitor: Tariff outcomes and discretionary elasticity remain the key swing factors; inventory rightsizing implies near-term markdown risk but should strengthen the back-half position .
- Medium-term thesis: If acceleration efforts translate to faster, leaner operations and digital monetization scales, Target’s cross-category model and stores-as-hubs fulfillment advantage can reflate comps/margins into FY2026 .