TB
Toll Brothers, Inc. (TOL)·Q2 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Record Q2 home sales revenue of $2.71B and diluted EPS of $3.50, beating Wall Street on both revenue ($2.49B est.) and EPS ($2.86 est.) as Toll delivered 2,899 homes and leveraged stronger-than-expected same-quarter sell-and-settle spec activity and cost control; adjusted home sales gross margin was 27.5% and SG&A 9.5% . Q2 2025 consensus: revenue $2.49B*, EPS $2.86*.
- Despite softer demand (net signed contracts down 13% units YoY), management reaffirmed full-year guidance, citing backlog strength ($6.84B; 6,063 homes) and a strategy prioritizing price/margin over pace; Q3 guide implies stable margins (27.25% adjusted) and 2,800–3,000 deliveries .
- Mix tailwinds (more luxury, Mid-Atlantic/Pacific), strict cost control, and higher-than-modeled spec sell-and-settle drove the beat; incentives averaged ~7% of ASP in Q2 as Toll calibrated pricing to conditions without sacrificing margin guidance .
- Capital returns stepped up: buyback target increased to $600M for FY25 (from $500M), and dividend was raised 9% to $0.25; liquidity stood at ~$2.8B and net debt-to-capital at 19.8% at quarter-end .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
-
What Went Well
- “We generated record second quarter home sales revenues of $2.71 billion, well above our guidance of $2.47 billion, and beat both our adjusted gross margin and SG&A guidance,” demonstrating execution in a softer demand backdrop .
- Adjusted home sales gross margin of 27.5% (+25 bps vs. guide) benefited from positive mix, cost control, and leverage; SG&A of 9.5% also beat, aided by higher revenue .
- Capital allocation: increased FY25 buyback plan to $600M and maintained strong balance sheet (cash $686M, net debt/cap 19.8%), reinforcing confidence and support for EPS .
-
What Went Wrong
- Demand softness: net signed contracts fell 13% units and 11% dollars YoY; management cited lower consumer confidence and macro volatility; trend persisted into early Q3 .
- ASP mix: delivered ASP (~$934K) was below guide low end due to more deliveries in Mountain and Mid-Atlantic; adjusted gross margin still held, but adj. home sales gross margin declined YoY (27.5% vs. 28.2%) as incentives ticked up .
- SG&A deleverage vs. prior year (9.5% vs. 9.0%) and lower “other income” vs. last year's land-sale-driven Q2 tough comp ($29M vs. $203.7M) pressured YoY operating metrics .
Financial Results
Q2 results vs prior year and prior quarter
Q2 actual vs Wall Street consensus (S&P Global)
- Values marked with * retrieved from S&P Global.
Geographic segment performance (home sales)
KPIs and order metrics
Guidance Changes
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- “We generated record second quarter home sales revenues of $2.71 billion, well above our guidance of $2.47 billion, and beat both our adjusted gross margin and SG&A guidance.” — CEO Douglas C. Yearley, Jr. .
- “In this environment, we believe prioritizing price and margin over pace makes the most strategic sense.” — CEO, on demand strategy .
- “Our second quarter adjusted gross margin was 27.5%, which was 25 basis points better than guidance... SG&A as a percentage of home sales revenue was 9.5%,... reflecting our focus on cost controls and leverage from higher-than-expected home sales revenue.” — CFO Martin Connor .
- “Given our strong financial position... we are increasing our projected share repurchases in fiscal ’25 from $500 million to $600 million.” — CEO .
Q&A Highlights
- Spec inventory and coverage: ~1,028 completed specs; ~2,400 in progress; permits for additional 1,000–2,000; ~1,900 homes needed from unsold specs to hit FY deliveries, with cost risk limited as builds are contracted; pricing risk budgeted conservatively .
- Margin cadence: Q3 ~27.25% adj GM; Q4 similar; mix tailwinds (more luxury, Pacific/Mid-Atlantic) offset higher spec incentives; strategy is price/margin over pace .
- Demand cadence: February weakest; March/April stable; May tracking similar; management not assuming a market improvement in guidance .
- SG&A leverage: Q4 leverage driven by higher revenue; variable sales costs modestly lower aided Q2 .
- Regional color: Strength in Northeast corridor, California, Las Vegas, Denver, Boise; softness in Pacific NW, most Florida, parts of Texas, Phoenix .
- Land spend and pipeline: ~$723M land spend in Q2 to purchase ~4,380 lots; tightening underwriting and expecting lower land spend for FY26 unless market improves; increased use of options/land banking .
Estimates Context
- Q2 2025 beat: Revenue $2.74B vs $2.49B consensus*; EPS $3.50 vs $2.86 consensus* .
- Street may refine near-term models for: (a) stronger sell-and-settle spec conversion in Q3, (b) mix shift to higher-margin luxury/Mid-Atlantic/Pacific, and (c) SG&A leverage into H2 given higher revenue cadence; management reaffirmed FY targets equating to roughly ~$14 EPS with book value per share ~$90 YE outlook .
- Values marked with * retrieved from S&P Global.
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Quality beat with reaffirmed FY guide: execution and operating leverage are offsetting softer orders; margin framework (~27.25–27.5% adj) looks durable in current conditions .
- Near-term catalysts: increased buyback to $600M and stable Q3 margin/delivery guide provide support; dividend increase adds yield underpinning .
- Spec monetization is a feature, not a bug: ample completed/in-progress specs underpin 2H delivery cadence while BTO margins remain several hundred bps above average .
- Demand softer but resilient in affluent cohorts: cancellation rates remain low; backlog ASP at a record $1.13M; regional strength (NE/Pacific) and luxury mix help protect margins .
- Balance sheet/liquidity strong: $2.8B liquidity, net debt-to-cap 19.8%, revolver extended/upsized to 2030; supports continued investment and returns .
- Watch list: Florida/Texas/Phoenix demand elasticity and incentive levels; Q3 sell-and-settle conversion vs assumptions; JV/other income timing (4Q weighted) .
- Medium-term: community count growth (8–10% in FY25 and similar in FY26) plus mix normalization supports steady margins and ROE focus, with upside if demand improves .
Citations
- Q2 2025 press release and financials:
- 8-K Item 2.02 and exhibit:
- Q2 2025 earnings call transcript:
- Q1 2025 press release and call: ;
- Q4 2024 call for trend context:
- Dividend increase press release: