TRI Q2 2025: Gen AI Products Now 22% of ACV, Driving Growth
- Innovative AI product suite: The company is aggressively integrating agentic AI into its offerings—with products like Westlaw Advantage (featuring deep research capabilities) and new CoCounsel solutions (Ready to Review and Ready to Advise)—which differentiates its product portfolio and positions it to capture additional market share.
- Strong capital metrics: With guidance on free cash flow of approximately $1.9B for 2025 and a capital capacity of $10B through 2027 alongside low net leverage (0.5x), the firm is well positioned for strategic acquisitions and potential share buybacks, supporting sustained growth and shareholder returns.
- Broad customer adoption of AI: The Q&A highlighted strong and pervasive demand across legal, tax, and accounting segments, with a significant portion of revenue (22% of ACV) already stemming from Gen AI–enabled products. This widespread client interest suggests an accelerating adoption curve that can drive future organic revenue and margin expansion.
- Margin Pressure Risk: Guidance indicates that after Q2’s favorable margin performance—boosted by timing of expenses and operating leverage—Q3 margins are expected to drop to around 36% due to seasonal factors, reversal of expense timing (including integration costs for acquisitions like SafeSend), and tougher comps in certain segments.
- Uncertain AI and Automation ROI: Management was not able to quantify the current percentage of internal workflows automated by GenAI, citing early-stage adoption and variability across functions. This lack of clear metrics on the benefits of investing in advanced AI offerings creates uncertainty regarding future operational efficiencies and margin improvements.
- Competitive and Integration Challenges: The Q&A highlighted an increasingly competitive landscape in AI-driven legal solutions, with competitors making new partnerships and product announcements. Additionally, the reversal of integration benefits for recent acquisitions could weigh on future performance if integration costs persist, potentially affecting profitability.
| Metric | Period | Previous Guidance | Current Guidance | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Organic Revenue Growth | FY 2025 | 7% to 7.5% with Big 3 at 9% | 7% to 7.5% with Big 3 at 9% | no change |
Adjusted EBITDA Margin | FY 2025 | ≈39% | ≈39% | no change |
Free Cash Flow | FY 2025 | $1.9 billion | $1.9 billion | no change |
Depreciation & Amortization of Computer Software | FY 2025 | no prior guidance | $625 million to $635 million | no prior guidance |
Net Interest Expense | FY 2025 | no prior guidance | $130 million | no prior guidance |
Organic Revenue Growth | Q3 2025 | no prior guidance | ≈7% | no prior guidance |
Adjusted EBITDA Margin | Q3 2025 | no prior guidance | ≈36% | no prior guidance |
Organic Revenue Growth (Legal Professionals) | FY 2026 | no prior guidance | 8% to 9% | no prior guidance |
Organic Revenue Growth (Corporates) | FY 2026 | no prior guidance | 9% to 11% | no prior guidance |
Organic Revenue Growth (Tax & Accounting Professionals) | FY 2026 | no prior guidance | 11% to 13% | no prior guidance |
Adjusted EBITDA Margin | FY 2026 | no prior guidance | Expand by at least 50 basis points | no prior guidance |
Free Cash Flow | FY 2026 | no prior guidance | $2 billion to $2.1 billion | no prior guidance |
| Topic | Previous Mentions | Current Period | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|
AI and GenAI | Q1 2025 emphasized integration of GenAI into products (e.g., Westlaw, CoCounsel) and new launches with metrics improving from 18% ACV in Q4 2024 | Q2 2025 highlighted Agentic AI offerings, internal AI tool pilots, increased GenAI ACV (22% vs 20% last quarter) with expanded legal and tax/adoption focus | Continued emphasis and deeper integration: sentiment changes to a more segmented and product‐specific approach with additional internal tool initiatives and encouraging early customer feedback. |
Margin and Expense Timing | Q4 2024 discussed lower margins (37.6% overall, 41.7% for Big 3) driven by investments and difficult comparisons; Q1 2025 noted margin declines due to expense timing shifts and recessionary comparisons | Q2 2025 reported a 37.8% adjusted EBITDA margin benefiting from operating leverage but flagged that timing benefits (e.g., delayed integration costs) will reverse later in the year | Increased focus on timing risks: while margins benefited in the current quarter, there is more forward‐looking caution about expense reversals in subsequent quarters. |
Acquisition Integration | Q1 2025 reviewed smooth integration of SafeSend and Pagero with product transition challenges (e.g., FindLaw divestiture) and Q4 2024 elaborated on acquisitions like SafeSend with detailed M&A strategy | Q2 2025 did not specifically address integration or transition challenges, instead emphasizing broader M&A strategy and product investments | Reduced emphasis on challenges: earlier detailed integration challenges have been managed successfully, with Q2 focusing more on broader acquisition strategy and innovation rather than integration difficulties. |
Capital Allocation and M&A Potential | Q1 2025 mentioned a dividend increase, debt paydown, strong net leverage (0.6x), and strategic acquisitions (SafeSend) and Q4 2024 detailed a balanced capital allocation, strong cash positions, and multiple acquisitions with robust dividend increases | Q2 2025 reaffirmed a capital capacity of $10B, low net leverage (0.5x), repayment of a bond, and an ongoing focus on strategic M&A in core segments | Consistently strong and opportunistic: overall sentiment remains positive with steady capital strength, and an increased focus on leveraging M&A opportunities while maintaining a balanced approach. |
Recurring Revenue and Organic Growth | Q1 2025 noted an 80% recurring revenue base and overall organic revenue growth of 6% with strong contributions from Legal, Corporates, and TAP ; Q4 2024 reported organic growth in key segments and recurring revenue growing 8% for Big 3 | Q2 2025 reported organic revenue growth of 7% overall and highlighted double-digit growth in several segments (e.g., 11% in Tax & Accounting) with detailed segment drivers | Consistent strength with slight acceleration: recurring revenues remain a key strength, with current segments showing improved organic growth metrics compared to previous periods. |
Operational Execution and Customer Success | Q1 2025 mentioned integration efforts (SafeSend) and a resilient, recurring revenue model, but without detailed challenges ; Q4 2024 provided an in‐depth focus on customer success, improved execution metrics, and internal accountability frameworks | Q2 2025 did not provide specific information on operational or customer success challenges [N/A] | Less emphasis in current period: while earlier calls (especially Q4 2024) detailed execution and customer success priorities, Q2 2025 did not highlight these aspects, possibly indicating stabilization or resolution. |
Currency Exposure and FX Risks | Q1 2025 detailed a 40 basis point FX tailwind and highlighted key currencies (British pound, Argentine peso, Brazilian real) ; Q4 2024 noted a minimal positive FX impact on EPS | Q2 2025 mentioned that revenue growth comparisons are made before currency adjustments and that currency had no impact on adjusted EPS | Stable and less discussed: while earlier periods provided more specifics on FX impacts, Q2 2025 minimizes the discussion, suggesting FX risks remain moderate and are well-managed. |
Competitive Landscape | Q4 2024 highlighted strong adoption of AI-driven products (e.g., Westlaw Precision >40% ACV penetration) and pricing power ; Q1 2025 did not explicitly discuss competition in AI legal solutions | Q2 2025 provided a detailed analysis of a “new era of competition” in AI legal solutions with emphasis on content depth, integrated solutions, and specialized research tools | Heightened competitive awareness: current period shows a sharper focus on differentiators and innovative AI features to stay ahead, indicating a market with increasing competitive pressures. |
Uncertain ROI for AI and Automation | Q4 2024 did not raise concerns on ROI while highlighting significant AI investments of over $200M ; Q1 2025 did not mention uncertainty, instead stressing value-based pricing and efficiency gains | Q2 2025 noted it is too early to quantify the ROI of internal AI tools even though early successes are observed | Emergence of caution: while prior periods were more optimistic about investment returns, Q2 2025 introduces a note of uncertainty on quantification of ROI, reflecting typical early-stage investment challenges. |
-
Capital Deployment
Q: How will excess capital be deployed?
A: Management highlighted a robust $10B capital capacity through 2027, focusing on strategic M&A and potential NCIB share buybacks in the $400–500M range for 2025, underscoring disciplined capital allocation. -
Margins Outlook
Q: What drove Q2 margins, unchanged guidance?
A: They noted strong operating leverage and favorable expense timing in Q2 boosted margins, even though a seasonal decline is expected in Q3; full-year guidance remains around 39%. -
Free Cash Flow Guidance
Q: How will FCF accelerate in H2?
A: With Q2 FCF at about $843M and H1 impacted by bonus payments, management expects easier comps and improved working capital in H2 to meet full-year guidance of roughly $1.9B. -
Agentic AI Automation
Q: What percent of workflows are automated?
A: While exact figures weren’t provided, management stressed that automation is modest in legal and more pronounced in tax for ancillary tasks, with anticipated TAM growth around 20% since Investor Day. -
Product Pricing
Q: How will upgrading to Advantage affect pricing?
A: They expect a clear pricing premium for Westlaw Advantage, with a higher initial sale premium and out-year increases reflecting the added value of its enhanced AI and integrated offerings. -
Product Integration
Q: Is Westlaw Advantage separate from Precision?
A: Management confirmed Westlaw Advantage is a separate, subscription-based tier that provides access to deep research and delivers a more integrated experience with co-counsel and Practical Law. -
Competitive Differentiation
Q: How do you compare against competitors?
A: They reaffirmed their competitive edge lies in a unique blend of proprietary content and integrated AI solutions, which differentiates them from rivals and drives innovation. -
AI Adoption Metrics
Q: How do enterprise and mid-market AI adoptions differ?
A: Management observed an even interest curve across all client sizes, with robust uptake tracked by monthly usage and continued focus on customer retention metrics. -
Tax EBITDA & Client Adoption
Q: Is Tax EBITDA growth due to timing or integration?
A: They explained that strong tax and accounting EBITDA growth is largely from timing shifts in SafeSend integration, with wide client interest across firm sizes supporting sustained margins. -
Gen AI ACV Breakdown
Q: How is Gen AI adoption segmented?
A: While the overall Gen AI enabled ACV stands at 22%, management noted that legal drives the majority, with further growth expected across corporates and tax offerings with upcoming product launches.
Research analysts covering THOMSON REUTERS CORP /CAN/.