Sign in

Jean-Francois Turgeon

Director at Tronox HoldingsTronox Holdings
Board

About Jean‑Francois Turgeon

Former Co‑CEO of Tronox (retired April 1, 2024), now a non‑employee director since 2021. Age 58 as of March 15, 2025, with a background in chemical engineering (B.Sc. Université Laval) and an M.S. in hydrometallurgy (McGill University); spent 24 years at Rio Tinto leading its iron & titanium business and chaired Richards Bay Minerals and Rio Tinto Fer et Titane .

Past Roles

OrganizationRoleTenureCommittees/Impact
Tronox Holdings plcCo‑CEOMar 18, 2021 – Apr 1, 2024Led transition to sole CEO model; retirement triggered equity treatment as described below
Tronox Holdings plcEVP & COOSep 2017 – Mar 2021Oversaw global operations
Tronox Holdings plcEVP & President, Titanium DioxideJan 2014 – Sep 2017Led TiO2 business
Rio Tinto GroupManaging Director, Iron & TitaniumPrior 24 yearsChaired Richards Bay Minerals (South Africa) and Rio Tinto Fer et Titane (Canada)

External Roles

OrganizationRoleTenureCommittees/Impact
Richards Bay Minerals (Rio Tinto affiliate)Chairman (prior)Not disclosedGovernance leadership in mining operations
Rio Tinto Fer et TitaneChairman (prior)Not disclosedGovernance leadership in titanium business

No current public company directorships are disclosed for Mr. Turgeon in the latest proxy .

Board Governance

  • Independence: Classified as non‑independent under NYSE standards (former executive) .
  • Committee assignments: None; he is not listed as a member of Audit, HRCC, or Corporate Governance & Sustainability committees .
  • Attendance and engagement: Board met 5 times in 2024; all directors attended 100% of board and applicable committee meetings .
  • Executive sessions: Board held 4 executive sessions in 2024 without management .
  • Years of service on this board: Director since 2021 .

Fixed Compensation

Tronox non‑employee director compensation structure (applies company‑wide):

ComponentAmount/TermsNotes
Annual cash retainer$100,000Payable quarterly in arrears
Annual equity grant (RSUs)$150,000 grant‑date valueGranted at AGM; vests at next AGM or May 31 following grant; 2024 grant was 8,324 RSUs for each non‑employee director at $150,000 ÷ $18.02, valued at $19.19 on grant date
Committee chair feesAudit: $50,000; HRCC: $20,000; CG&S: $20,000Additional to base retainer
Committee member fee$15,000 per committeeIf not serving as chair
Chair of the Board stipend$15,000 per monthIn addition to regular director pay (Mr. Kaufthal)
Tax equalization and UK tax filing supportProvidedTo mitigate incremental UK tax burden for non‑resident directors

Executive‑to‑Director transition payments (2024):

ItemAmountDetail
Salary (as Co‑CEO until retirement)$237,5012024 executive salary prior to retirement
All Other Compensation$1,108,148Includes accrued unused vacation/sick time and other items; see detail below
Pro‑rated AIP (Target)$239,400Pro‑rated 2024 target AIP payment as a retiree
Accrued unused vacation/sick$604,064Paid on retirement

Performance Compensation

Executive AIP framework (context for 2024 pro‑rated AIP on retirement):

MetricWeight2024 Target/Design2024 Actual/Outcome
Adjusted EBITDA – Capex50%Cash flow focusCompany achieved Adj. EBITDA $564M; AIP payout factor for overall Tronox component was 70.1% of target (context for NEOs)
Adjusted EBITDA Margin vs TiO2 peers30%Relative margin vs Chemours TT, Kronos, LB GroupRelative assessment used; payout included in overall 70.1% factor
Safety DIFR7.5%Target 0.15Actual 0.17 (miss)
Safety TRIFR7.5%Target 0.36Actual 0.33 (beat)
CO2 intensity (Scope 1+2)5%Target 1.386 tCO2e/t (−17% vs 2019)Actual 1.338 tCO2e/t (−20% vs 2019)

Equity awards (vesting/performance) continuing post‑retirement:

GrantTypeSharesVesting/PerformanceStatus
Feb 3, 2022Time‑based RSUs17,639Vest Mar 5, 2025Continues to vest as director
Feb 3, 2022Performance RSUs52,916Performance period ended Dec 31, 2024; vest Mar 5, 2025Forfeited; overall payout 0% (TSR/ROIC)
Feb 21, 2023Time‑based RSUs34,285 + 34,285Vest Mar 5, 2025 and Mar 5, 2026Continues to vest as director
Feb 21, 2023Performance RSUs51,427 TSR + 51,427 ROICEligible to vest Mar 5, 2026 subject to performanceContinues outstanding; subject to Company TSR/ROIC

ROIC performance metric and payout (2022 grant, measured through 2024):

MetricThreshold (25%)Target (100%)Maximum (200%)ActualPayout
3‑yr Avg Annual ROIC improvement vs 20211.6%3.2%≥4.8%−8.0%0.0%

Change‑in‑control/severance policy context (for executives; Mr. Turgeon retired, but equity treatment follows MEIP and award agreements):

  • Change‑in‑control equity vesting: all units vest at target for performance RSUs upon CIC termination; time‑based RSUs vest; policy tables use $10.07 stock price for valuation .
  • General severance multipliers and bonus treatment are detailed for NEOs; no excise tax gross‑ups are in change‑in‑control provisions .

Other Directorships & Interlocks

CompanyRoleCommittee RolesPotential Interlock/Conflict
None disclosed

Cristal/Tasnee designation rights (two directors) noted; Mr. Turgeon is not one of the Cristal‑designated directors .

Expertise & Qualifications

  • Deep titanium and mining operations expertise; prior leadership of Rio Tinto iron & titanium, and chair roles at RBM and RTFT .
  • Technical credentials in chemical engineering and hydrometallurgy .
  • Global operations and risk oversight experience aligning with Tronox’s mining/pigment footprint .

Equity Ownership

HolderShares Beneficially Owned% of OutstandingNotes
Jean‑Francois Turgeon685,074<1%Includes RSUs vesting within 60 days; share count as of March 10, 2025
RSUs vesting within 60 days (Mar 10, 2025 ref)9,156n/aScheduled vest per footnote; other non‑employee directors had 8,324 unvested RSUs from 2024 grant

Stock ownership guidelines: Directors must hold 500% of annual cash retainer; all current non‑executive directors meet guidelines except the two newest (Foufopoulos‑De Ridder and Beck); implies Mr. Turgeon is in compliance .

Anti‑hedging/pledging policy: Hedging, short sales, and derivative transactions are prohibited for directors and specified insiders .

Governance Assessment

  • Independence and committee service: Non‑independent status (former Co‑CEO) and no committee assignments reduce potential committee‑level conflicts but also limit formal oversight roles; independence classification is transparent .
  • Attendance and engagement: Strong signal—100% attendance at board meetings in 2024; board held routine executive sessions (4) without management .
  • Pay alignment and equity: Post‑retirement continuation of vesting on prior executive RSUs is allowed under MEIP and award agreements; 2022 performance RSUs paid out at 0% on combined TSR/ROIC result (ROIC −8.0%), reinforcing a pay‑for‑performance posture .
  • Ownership alignment: Significant beneficial ownership (685,074 shares) and compliance with director ownership guidelines support alignment with shareholders .
  • Potential conflicts and related‑party exposure: No specific related‑party transactions involving Mr. Turgeon disclosed; broader Tasnee/Cristal agreements exist at the company level and are governed by a Related Party Transactions Policy overseen by CG&S Committee . Non‑independent status as former executive is the primary inherent conflict signal.
  • Compensation practices: No excise tax gross‑ups in CIC; adoption of Dodd‑Frank clawback; anti‑hedging policy; director tax equalization for UK domicile is disclosed and applied across directors (standard for UK plc structure) .

RED FLAGS

  • Non‑independent director status (former Co‑CEO) may raise concerns about management influence, though mitigated by lack of committee assignments .
  • Continuation of vesting of significant prior executive equity while serving as director could blur pay distinctions; however, 2022 performance RSUs forfeited on results (0% payout), supporting performance discipline .
  • Director tax equalization and UK tax reimbursements are disclosed; while standard for UK domicile, investors may view such perquisites skeptically if not tightly controlled .

Say‑on‑pay & shareholder feedback context

  • 2024 say‑on‑pay approval ~97%; at least 96% approval for each of the last six years, indicating strong investor support for compensation governance .

Compensation peer group governance context

  • 2024 peer group (13 companies) and 2025 additions documented; use of independent consultants (FW Cook, FIT Remuneration) and annual review processes indicate robust compensation committee governance .

Overall, Turgeon brings deep operational and industry expertise and meaningful share ownership. Governance risks center on his non‑independent status and legacy equity vesting, mitigated by zero committee roles, full meeting attendance, and strong company‑level pay‑for‑performance features and policies .