Sign in

TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC (TXN) Q2 2025 Earnings Summary

Executive Summary

  • Q2 revenue $4.45B and EPS $1.41, both above consensus; revenue +9% q/q and +16% y/y, driven by a broad industrial recovery, while auto declined slightly q/q but grew y/y .
  • Gross margin expanded 110 bps q/q to ~58% and operating margin reached ~35%; management guided Q3 revenue to $4.45–$4.80B and EPS $1.36–$1.60, implying flattish GM% given higher depreciation .
  • Tone turned more cautious vs Q1 as management flagged tariff/geopolitical noise and potential Q2 “pull-ins,” especially in China; still sees cyclical recovery progressing with four of five end markets improving .
  • Cash generation remained strong: TTM CFO $6.44B and FCF $1.76B; TI returned $6.71B to owners over TTM; Q3 dividend maintained at $1.36 per share .
  • Strategic U.S. manufacturing build-out continues (Sherman, Richardson, Lehi), positioning TI for geopolitically dependable, low-cost 300mm capacity; management expects cash tax rates to be significantly lower for several years due to new U.S. tax law .

What Went Well and What Went Wrong

What Went Well

  • Industrial revenue “upper teens” y/y and “mid-teens” q/q with broad-based recovery across sectors; China industrial led growth, contributing to overall sequential strength .
  • Enterprise systems grew ~40% y/y (about 10% q/q), with data center demand strong; management highlighted >50% growth and new SiGe-based capabilities ramping in Sherman .
  • Gross margin increased 110 bps q/q to ~58%, aided by higher revenue and mix, despite rising depreciation; operating margin reached ~35% .

What Went Wrong

  • Automotive was down low single digits q/q and only mid-single digits y/y growth, with recovery described as “shallow,” consistent across U.S., Europe, and China .
  • Management described Q2 as “noisy,” attributing part of strength to tariff-related inventory “pull-ins” in early quarter, normalizing later; hence more conservative Q3 guide relative to Q2 beat .
  • Net of OI&E and interest expected to be ~$20M unfavorable in Q3 as cash levels declined and interest expense rose, tempering EPS fall-through despite revenue growth .

Financial Results

MetricQ4 2024Q1 2025Q2 2025
Revenue ($USD Billions)$4.01 $4.07 $4.45
Diluted EPS ($USD)$1.30 $1.28 $1.41
Gross Profit ($USD Billions)$2.31 $2.31 $2.58
Gross Margin (%)58% 57% 58%
Operating Profit ($USD Billions)$1.38 $1.32 $1.56
Operating Margin (%)34% 33% 35%
Q2 2025 vs EstimatesConsensus*ActualBeat/Miss
Revenue ($USD Billions)$4.315*$4.448 Beat
EPS ($USD)$1.366*$1.41 Beat

Values with asterisk (*) retrieved from S&P Global.

Segment performance

SegmentQ1 2025 Revenue ($USD Millions)Q2 2025 Revenue ($USD Millions)Q1 2025 Op Profit ($USD Millions)Q2 2025 Op Profit ($USD Millions)
Analog$3,210 $3,452 $1,206 $1,325
Embedded Processing$647 $679 $40 $85
Other$212 $317 $78 $153

Key performance indicators

KPIQ1 2025Q2 2025
Cash from Operations ($USD Millions)$849 $1,860
Capital Expenditures ($USD Millions)$1,123 $1,305
Free Cash Flow ($USD Millions)($14) $555
Inventory ($USD Billions)$4.69 $4.81
Inventory Days240 231
Dividends Paid (Quarter) ($USD Millions)$1,238 $1,235
Stock Repurchases (Quarter) ($USD Millions)$653 $302
Total Debt Outstanding ($USD Billions)$12.95 $14.15
Cash & ST Investments ($USD Billions)~$5.0 $5.36 (cash $3.04 + ST investments $2.32)

Guidance Changes

MetricPeriodPrevious GuidanceCurrent GuidanceChange
Revenue ($USD Billions)Q2 2025$4.17–$4.53 N/AN/A
EPS ($USD)Q2 2025$1.21–$1.47 N/AN/A
Revenue ($USD Billions)Q3 2025N/A$4.45–$4.80 New range
EPS ($USD)Q3 2025N/A$1.36–$1.60 New range
Gross Margin (%)Q3 2025N/AAbout flat vs Q2 Maintained
OpEx ($USD)Q3 2025N/AAbout flat vs Q2 Maintained
Net OI&E vs InterestQ3 2025N/AUnfavorable by ~$20M New headwind
Effective Tax RateQ2/Q3 202512–13% (Q2) ~12–13% (Q3 guide); GAAP tax rate to rise in Q3 due to new law, then decrease in 2026; cash tax significantly lower for several years Updated framework
Dividend per ShareQ3 2025N/A$1.36 declared payable Aug 12, 2025 Maintained

Earnings Call Themes & Trends

TopicPrevious Mentions (Q4 2024)Previous Mentions (Q1 2025)Current Period (Q2 2025)Trend
Industrial recoveryDown low-single digits q/q; bottoming in some sectors; energy infra/automation still weak “Upper single digits” q/q; broad recovery; low customer inventories “Upper teens” y/y and “mid-teens” q/q; broad across sectors; China led Accelerating
AutomotiveMid-single digit q/q decline; China stronger offsetting weakness elsewhere Low single-digit q/q growth; shallow cycle Down low single digits q/q; shallow recovery y/y; consignment/real-time ordering Lagging
Tariffs/geopoliticsCompetitive dynamics stable; China important; no investigation notification Preparing for evolving tariffs; dual flows/logistics flexibility Q2 “pull-ins” in early quarter; tariffs paused; cautious Q3 guide Noise moderating, still influential
AI/data centerEnterprise mixed; no specific AI detail Enterprise up mid-single digits; turns strengthening Data center growth >50% y/y; expanding app-specific positions; new SiGe tech in Sherman Structural tailwind
Inventory/turnsTurns drove Q4 beat; inventory 241 days Lead times short; turns high; inventory up to $4.69B Inventory $4.81B, days down to 231; turns continued acceleration Healthy replenishment
Capex/depreciationElevated Capex (~$4.8B ’24); GM pressured; LFAB underutilization impacts embedded Capex $5B ’25 target; Q2 loadings to increase slightly; GM up vs Q1 Capex $1.3B in Q2; GM about flat in Q3; depreciation rising; $20M OI&E headwind Investment phase persisting
Regional trends (China)China business grew mid-teens y/y; PE and auto strength China ~20% of rev; dual flow flexibility China up ~19% q/q, ~32% y/y; auto not a standout; industrial led Strong but “hot” normalization
Tax and policy2025 ETR ~12% Q2 ETR 12–13% New U.S. law: GAAP tax up in Q3, down in 2026; cash taxes significantly lower for several years Favorable cash tax outlook

Management Commentary

  • “Revenue increased 9% sequentially, led by continued broad recovery in industrial, and 16% from the same quarter a year ago.” – Haviv Ilan .
  • “Gross profit in the quarter was $2.6 billion, or 58% of revenue… Operating profit was $1.6 billion… Net income… $1.41 per share.” – Rafael Lizardi .
  • “Our customers are increasingly valuing our geopolitically dependable capacity… TI has a unique answer [with U.S. manufacturing footprint].” – Haviv Ilan .
  • “Data center… is behaving very well this year… growing nicely at a very high level, above that 50%… ramping new technology in Sherman, Texas.” – Haviv Ilan .
  • “We continue to invest in our competitive advantages… manufacturing and technology, broad product portfolio, reach of our channels, and diverse and long‑lived positions.” – Rafael Lizardi .

Q&A Highlights

  • Tone and guidance: Management acknowledged Q2 benefited from early-quarter tariff-related “pull-ins,” normalizing later; hence a prudent Q3 outlook despite cycle strength in four of five markets .
  • Gross margin mechanics: Q3 GM% guided about flat despite higher revenue due to rising depreciation; OpEx about flat; net OI&E/interest ~$20M unfavorable .
  • Utilization/inventory: Q3 loadings to run “about the same” as Q2; inventory expected to grow but at a slower rate; day levels down to 231 in Q2 .
  • Automotive: Recovery remains shallow; orders largely real-time (consignment) with low inventories across tiers; regionally consistent sequential performance .
  • Tax law: GAAP tax rate to rise in Q3; decline in 2026; materially lower cash taxes for several years; Capex plans unchanged ($5B in ’25; $2–$5B in ’26) .

Estimates Context

  • Q2 2025: TI delivered a clean beat versus consensus, with revenue $4.45B vs $4.32B* and EPS $1.41 vs $1.366*; beats driven by industrial strength and robust turns activity, with early-quarter tariff-related orders contributing . Values retrieved from S&P Global.
  • Q3 2025: Guidance revenue range $4.45–$4.80B brackets consensus ~$4.64B*; EPS range $1.36–$1.60 brackets consensus ~$1.486*; given net OI&E headwind and depreciation, Street may trim GM/EBIT fall-through assumptions while maintaining cautious auto trajectory . Values retrieved from S&P Global.

Key Takeaways for Investors

  • Industrial momentum is real and broad; Q3 guide prudently accounts for Q2 “pull-ins,” but the cycle is progressing across most end markets; auto remains the laggard .
  • Expect near-term gross margin plateauing as depreciation steps up; model lower net OI&E given rising interest expense and lower cash levels in Q3 .
  • China ran “hot” in Q2 (industrial-led); normalization likely in Q3, reducing risk of double-ordering while maintaining cycle improvement .
  • U.S. manufacturing build-out is a structural competitive advantage for geopolitically dependable capacity and cost, with data center and SiGe pipelines ramping for 2026+ .
  • New U.S. tax law is a medium-term FCF catalyst: GAAP tax up in Q3 ’25, down in ’26; cash taxes significantly lower for several years—supportive of dividend durability and opportunistic buybacks .
  • Embedded margins remain pressured by LFAB underutilization but should inflect as internal manufacturing ramps and mix improves; maintain longer-term embedded contribution in models .
  • Near-term trading: Stock likely reacts to beats vs Q2 consensus and cautious Q3 tone; watch for data center updates and industrial momentum vs tariff noise; medium-term thesis hinges on cycle normalization, U.S. fab ramp, and FCF leverage from tax law changes .
Notes: 
- Values marked with * are retrieved from S&P Global consensus data via GetEstimates.

Citations: Q2 press release and tables ; Q2 call ; 8‑K 2.02 ; Q1 press release/call ; Q4 press release/call ; Dividend PR ; Manufacturing PR .

Best AI for Equity Research

Performance on expert-authored financial analysis tasks

Fintool-v490%
Claude Sonnet 4.555.3%
o348.3%
GPT 546.9%
Grok 440.3%
Qwen 3 Max32.7%