Q1 2025 Earnings Summary
- Robust client engagement and lending momentum: Management highlighted an exceptional spike in client activity in early April – with trading volumes exceeding COVID-era peaks by around 30% – reflecting heightened demand and resilience in market sentiment during volatile periods.
- Strong capital return discipline: Executives confirmed their firm commitment to fully accrue the 2025 share buyback, demonstrating confidence in the strong balance sheet, integration progress, and overall financial strength that supports shareholder returns.
- Strategic growth initiatives in key markets: The bank’s proactive steps – such as enhancing its adviser platform and entering into a strategic partnership in India – signal considerable potential for expanding market share and boosting profitability in growing geographies.
- Regulatory Uncertainty: Executives repeatedly noted a "wait-and-see" stance regarding upcoming proposals and potential immediate, material changes in the regulatory framework. This uncertainty could disrupt planned capital returns and force adjustments to their capital strategy ( ).
- Margin and Income Pressures: Some Q&A responses highlighted a slight deterioration in net interest income—with GWM NII coming in lower than initially expected—and concerns over segmentation changes and volatile market conditions. These factors could exert downward pressure on pretax margins and overall profitability ( ).
- Capital Constraints from Leverage: Despite effective RWA optimization, discussions revealed that the bank is more constrained by its leverage ratio, with risk density lower than anticipated. This limited optimization flexibility might expose the bank to heightened vulnerability under adverse market conditions ( ).
| Metric | Period | Previous Guidance | Current Guidance | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Capital and CET1 Ratio | FY 2025 | 14.3% | Maintain around 14% | lowered |
Credit Loss Expense (CLE) | FY 2025 | around CHF 350 million | around $350 million | no change |
Net Interest Income (GWM) | FY 2025 | no prior guidance | Decrease by a low single-digit percentage compared to 2024 | no prior guidance |
Net Interest Income (P&C) | FY 2025 | no prior guidance | Decline by around 10% in Swiss francs | no prior guidance |
Tax Rate | FY 2025 | no prior guidance | Effective tax rate of around 20% | no prior guidance |
Gross Cost Saves | FY 2025 | no prior guidance | Additional $4.5 billion to reach $13 billion target | no prior guidance |
Equity Double Leverage Ratio | Q2 2025 | no prior guidance | Improve to around 110% by end of Q2 2025 | no prior guidance |
Net Interest Income (GWM) | Q2 2025 | no prior guidance | Decrease by a low single-digit percentage | no prior guidance |
Net Interest Income (P&C) | Q2 2025 | no prior guidance | Decrease by a low single-digit percentage in Swiss francs, translating to mid-single-digit percentage increase in U.S. dollar terms | no prior guidance |
Tax Rate | Q2 2025 | no prior guidance | Expected tax rate of around 0% | no prior guidance |
Net New Assets (NNA) | Q2 2025 | no prior guidance | Outflows in the high single-digit billion range | no prior guidance |
| Topic | Previous Mentions | Current Period | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|
Regulatory Uncertainty and Capital Requirements | Q4 2024 discussions emphasized Basel III, FRTB impacts and Swiss regulatory reviews ( ), while Q2 2024 focused on the anticipated day‑1 impact of final Basel III rules and early dialogue with supervisors ( ) | Q1 2025 provided a more nuanced discussion, detailing RWA optimization, explicit leverage constraints (with a US$42 billion denominator increase) and a “wait‑and‑see” approach toward upcoming proposals ( ) | Consistent focus on managing capital requirements, but with Q1 2025 showing a more detailed approach to optimizing risk and addressing tighter leverage constraints, reflecting evolving regulatory uncertainty ( ) |
Net Interest Income and Margin Pressures | Q4 2024 highlighted modest improvements in NII and pressures from reduced deposit margins ( ); Q2 2024 also noted sequential NII declines and margin pressures due to mix shifts and competitive dynamics ( ) | Q1 2025 described further declines in NII driven by lower rates and seasonal effects, with clear commentary on pressured margins in both GWM and P&C segments ( ) | Continued challenges are noted across periods with consistently declining NII and sustained margin pressures, with the current period intensifying the focus on rate‐driven headwinds ( ) |
Strategic Growth and Market Expansion Initiatives | Q4 2024 mentioned enhancements in technology infrastructure and adviser productivity improvements along with regional investments without explicit new partnerships ( ); Q2 2024 did not mention these initiatives explicitly | Q1 2025 introduced explicit adviser platform enhancements—with emphasis on aligning incentives—and unveiled new geographic partnerships (e.g. India via 360 ONE) and investments in generative AI ( ) | New and more explicit emphasis in the current period with detailed initiatives and fresh geographic partnerships emerging, marking a positive strategic expansion step ( ) |
Capital Return Strategy and Share Buybacks | Q4 2024 outlined a clear strategy with planned share repurchases (split between H1 and H2 2025) and targeted CET1 ratios ( ); Q2 2024 referenced commitment to capital returns without detailed buyback timing ( ) | Q1 2025 reaffirmed confidence in 2025 capital return objectives with detailed share buyback plans (including completed $500 million repurchases and scheduled additional payments) and maintaining a target CET1 ratio of around 14% ( ) | Consistent commitment to delivering shareholder returns, with Q1 2025 providing greater detail and clarity on share buyback execution and tighter regulatory contingency, reflecting enhanced confidence amid integration progress ( ) |
Credit Suisse Integration and Cost Efficiency Measures | Q4 2024 showed significant progress through achieving legal entity mergers, client migrations, and substantial gross cost savings (targeting $13 billion) with detailed cost breaks ( ); Q2 2024 focused on capturing nearly half of the targeted savings, reducing legacy exposures and planning future platform consolidations ( ) | Q1 2025 provided further updates on deep integration progress (migrating 1 million Swiss clients, decommissioning over one‑third of legacy technology, and reporting additional technology cost savings of over $700 million) as well as ongoing efficiency gains ( ) | Steadily improving integration with continued cost reductions and efficiency measures, with Q1 2025 reflecting further maturity in integration and more concrete cost-saving achievements ( ) |
Global Wealth Management Challenges | Q4 2024 cited high cost/income ratios (80%) and muted client risk appetite, alongside some recovery in net new asset inflows ( ); Q2 2024 discussed high ratios (above 90% in the Americas) and the aim to reduce them to less than 70% by 2026, with subdued client risk appetite also noted ( ) | Q1 2025 noted improvements in cost/income ratios in GWM (down to 75%) but continued caution in client risk appetite—with reduced NII and conservative portfolio repositioning amid market volatility ( ) | Persistent challenges remain with high cost/income ratios and cautious client behavior, though Q1 2025 shows modest improvements in efficiency alongside continued client conservatism ( ) |
Robust Client Engagement, Trading Volumes, and Lending Momentum | Q4 2024 detailed solid client engagement with net new assets ($18 billion), strong transaction revenues, and record markets revenue in trading, and consistent lending volumes ( ); Q2 2024 emphasized robust net new assets ($127 billion total inflows over several quarters), strong trading volumes (markets revenue up 18% YoY) and healthy lending momentum across regions ( ) | Q1 2025 reported record trading volumes (30% surge compared to COVID-era peaks), robust client engagement with high net new inflows (e.g. $32 billion in GWM) and moderate lending pick-up (with specific figures for new loans and Swiss lending) ( ) | Sustained and even record levels of engagement are noted across periods; Q1 2025 continues this trend with particularly strong trading volumes and clear lending momentum, reflecting a resilient client base despite market headwinds ( ) |
Emerging Concerns Over Capital Constraints from Leverage | Q4 2024 mentioned pressures related to normalizing equity double leverage levels due to repatriated capital ( ); Q2 2024 did not explicitly address these concerns but discussed capital management and reducing leverage exposures via de-risking of legacy operations ( ) | Q1 2025 laid out explicit concerns regarding leverage constraints – highlighting that leverage is more binding than RWA, detailing a $42 billion increase in the leverage ratio denominator, and reiterating the intent to maintain a 14% CET1 despite tighter constraints ( ) | Increasing focus is evident in Q1 2025 on leverage constraints, with more explicit discussion and quantification compared to earlier periods, signaling a heightened regulatory and operational scrutiny on leverage management ( ) |
-
Capital Return
Q: Why fully accrue the buyback?
A: Management explained that fully accruing the 2025 buyback reflects their strong Q1 performance and capital position, while remaining cautious if any material regulatory changes occur ( ). -
Buyback Strategy
Q: Is buyback accrual unconditional?
A: They clarified that the accrual isn’t a fixed commitment but is based on current performance and will adjust if significant changes in the regulatory regime emerge ( ). -
Capital Ratios
Q: Why did CET1 drop and remain low?
A: The parent bank’s CET1 ratio fell by about 60bps due primarily to a dividend accrual, while effective RWA optimization has kept risk density low, though leverage remains less flexible ( ). -
Capital Positioning
Q: How does your capital compare with peers?
A: Management stated they are comfortable with a robust capital position under strict Swiss regulation, emphasizing a focus on both competitive returns and prudent capital management ( ). -
GWM NII
Q: Why was GWM net interest income lower?
A: They noted that segmentation adjustments and deposit flow shifts contributed roughly 1 percentage point to the deviation, though overall guidance remains intact with expectations of a recovery in Q2 ( ). -
US Advisors
Q: What’s the impact of advisor changes on flows?
A: The firm highlighted robust recruiting and strategic repositioning of advisors, which is expected to sustain strong same‐store net new money and maintain a stable platform ( ). -
Sponsor Activity
Q: How are sponsor deals affecting revenue?
A: Management observed a decline in sponsor-related activity; however, they stressed that the pipeline remains healthy and revenue assumptions would only be adjusted if market conditions change materially ( ). -
Regulatory Risk
Q: What about risks from regulatory changes?
A: They acknowledged the uncertainty in potential regulatory shifts but emphasized that any immediate material change remains unpredictable, so current guidance stays on track ( ). -
India Strategy
Q: What is the India partnership approach?
A: UBS sees strong long‐term potential in India by partnering with a leading local asset gatherer to leverage both domestic growth and international best practices ( ). -
Cost/Income Target
Q: How will the Swiss cost/income target be met?
A: They plan to manage negative rate effects and adjust deposit pricing, alongside disciplined cost controls, to hit the targeted 50% cost/income ratio in the Swiss business ( ). -
Equity Leverage
Q: Why lower the equity double leverage?
A: Operating at pre‐acquisition leverage levels is viewed as more prudent, providing a stronger buffer and greater operational flexibility in stress markets ( ). -
PCB Volumes
Q: What’s the outlook for PCB volumes amid FX shifts?
A: The guidance indicates that PCB lending and deposit volumes should remain stable, supported by balance sheet optimization and modest market adjustments ( ). -
FRC Drivers
Q: What drove the 27% FRC revenue rise?
A: The strong performance was driven by a robust FX position and concentration in areas less affected by broader market downturns, helping to boost FRC revenues ( ). -
Subsidiary Repatriation
Q: Any update on subsidiary capital repatriations?
A: Additional capital from the UK and U.S. subsidiaries remains in the regulatory process, with progress expected over the coming quarters ( ). -
Asia Releveraging
Q: Is Asia’s releveraging sustained?
A: Management confirmed that, while recent global market pressures have moderated activity somewhat, strategic lending in Asia remains a core focus and is expected to persist ( ). -
Capital Proposal Timing
Q: When is the next capital proposal expected?
A: They indicated that an update on the regulatory proposal for capital is now anticipated in the first week of June, with details forthcoming ( ).