Michael D. Hill
About Michael D. Hill
Michael D. Hill is 56 and has served as Upland Software’s Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer since the company’s founding in July 2010; he previously served as Corporate Secretary (2015–2019) and Assistant Secretary (2010–2015). He began his career at Ernst & Young LLP (Assurance and Advisory Business Services, Austin) and later held finance leadership roles at Perficient, Inc. (CFO 2004–2006; VP Strategic Finance 2006–2007). He holds a B.B.A. in Accounting from the University of Texas at Austin . Company performance metrics tied to executive pay include 2024 Adjusted EBITDA of $55.6 million and Adjusted EBITDA margin of 20.3%, which modestly exceeded the plan thresholds; Upland’s cumulative TSR from 2020 to 2024 was −88%, far below its NASDAQ Computer Technology Index peer group (+201%) .
Past Roles
| Organization | Role | Years | Strategic impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Perficient, Inc. | Chief Financial Officer | 2004–2006 | Finance leadership at a public IT consulting firm |
| Perficient, Inc. | VP, Strategic Finance | 2006–2007 | Strategic finance responsibilities |
| Ernst & Young LLP (Austin) | Assurance & Advisory Business Services | 1991–1999 | Assurance/advisory practice experience |
External Roles
No external public company board roles or committee positions for Hill are disclosed in the proxy’s executive officer biographies .
Fixed Compensation
| Metric | FY 2022 | FY 2023 | FY 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base Salary ($) | $275,000 | $300,000 | $300,000 |
- Target annual bonus: 125% of base salary, under the Corporate Bonus Plan .
- Perquisites: Value < $1,000 for each NEO in 2024 (except CEO); 401(k) plan with no employer match; no deferred compensation plan .
Performance Compensation
2024 Corporate Bonus Plan – Metrics and Outcome
| Metric | Threshold | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Adjusted EBITDA ($mm) | $55.0 | $55.6 | Threshold met (bonus pool funded) |
| Adjusted EBITDA Margin (%) | 20.0% | 20.3% | Secondary threshold met |
| Company-wide Bonus Pool Generated ($mm) | — | — | ~$1.1 |
-
Hill’s 2024 Corporate Bonus target and actual payout: | Item | Target ($) | Actual ($) | |---|---|---| | Michael D. Hill – Corporate Bonus | $375,000 | $61,382 |
-
Bonus plan design: Objective, formulaic funding from “over-performance” vs Adjusted EBITDA threshold; payout follows audited financials issuance .
2024 Equity Awards – Grants and Vesting
| Award Type | Grant Date | Shares (#) | Grant Date Fair Value ($) | Vesting Schedule |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RSU | 1/29/2024 | 100,000 | $429,000 | 12 equal quarterly installments from 3/16/2024 to 12/16/2026, service-based |
- No PSUs were granted to Hill in 2024 (PSUs were granted to the CEO; Hill’s equity is time-vested RSUs) .
- No outstanding stock options for NEOs in FY 2024; Hill had none .
Equity Ownership & Alignment
| Item | Detail |
|---|---|
| Total beneficial ownership (common shares) | 363,259; includes 160,042 held by MDH Trust; excludes 159,165 unvested RSUs |
| Ownership % of common | 1.3% |
| Unvested RSUs at 12/31/2024 | 117,498 total: 17,499 (2022 grant), 33,332 (2023 grant), 66,667 (2024 grant) |
| RSU vesting schedules (remaining) | 12/16/2022–9/16/2025 (70k original); 3/16/2023–12/16/2025 (100k original); 3/16/2024–12/16/2026 (100k original) |
| 2024 RSU vesting activity | 112,501 shares vested; value realized $331,596 |
| Stock ownership guidelines | CEO 6× salary; other NEOs 4× salary; seven-year compliance window; all NEOs “targeted to be in compliance” by end of window as of 4/14/2025 |
| Hedging/pledging | Prohibited: short sales, margin accounts, pledging, and hedging (e.g., collars, forwards) |
| Insider trading policy | Pre-clearance required for officers/directors; predetermined closed windows; 10b5-1 plan oversight |
| Clawback policy | Adopted Oct 2023; recoup excess incentive comp for material restatements under Rule 10D‑1, lookback of 3 fiscal years |
Employment Terms
| Term | Key Provision |
|---|---|
| Employment agreement | Dated 3/28/2017; amended 3/13/2019 and 11/12/2020 |
| Employment status | At-will; base salary $300,000; benefits similar to other employees |
| Target bonus | 125% of base salary under Corporate Bonus Plan |
| Severance (without cause or for good reason) | Earned but unpaid bonus; 12 months base salary; 12 months COBRA premium reimbursement (ceases upon new employment offering coverage) |
| Equity acceleration (no CIC) | For NEOs other than CEO/President-COO: vesting catch-up up to ~2 months based on 36 monthly installments from Jan 1 of grant year; may be none to two months |
| Equity acceleration (CIC double trigger) | 100% acceleration for NEOs upon termination without cause or resignation for good reason “in connection with” a change in control |
| Definitions | Detailed “Cause,” “Good Reason,” and “Change in Control” definitions per agreements |
Estimated Payments if Terminated on 12/31/2024 (illustrative)
| Item | Amount ($) |
|---|---|
| Severance (without cause/for good reason) | $694,160 |
| Equity acceleration (termination in connection with CIC) | $509,941 |
| Equity acceleration (termination not in connection with CIC) | — (N/A) |
| Equity acceleration (death or disability) | $509,941 |
Compensation Structure – Multi-Year View
| Metric | FY 2022 | FY 2023 | FY 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Salary ($) | $275,000 | $300,000 | $300,000 |
| Bonus ($) | — | $75,000 | — |
| Stock Awards ($) | $1,918,425 | $852,000 | $429,000 |
| Non-Equity Incentive ($) | $98,438 | — | $61,382 |
| All Other Comp ($) | — | — | — |
| Total ($) | $2,291,863 | $1,227,000 | $790,382 |
Performance Compensation – Detailed Table (2024)
| Metric | Weighting | Target | Actual | Payout | Vesting |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Corporate Bonus – Adjusted EBITDA | 100% of bonus opportunity | $55.0mm threshold | $55.6mm | $61,382 (Hill) | Cash, after audited results |
| Corporate Bonus – Adjusted EBITDA Margin | Secondary threshold | 20.0% threshold | 20.3% | Included in pool | Cash, after audited results |
| RSUs (2024 grant) | — | 100,000 units | Service-based vesting | Grant date FV $429,000 | 12 equal quarterly installments (3/16/2024–12/16/2026) |
Notes: Hill’s incentive mix emphasizes Adjusted EBITDA-driven cash bonuses and time-vested RSUs; he did not receive PSUs tied to TSR in 2024 (unlike the CEO) .
Risk Indicators & Red Flags
- Hedging and pledging prohibited under the Insider Trading Policy—helps mitigate misalignment and forced selling risk .
- Clawback policy aligned with SEC Rule 10D-1 adopted Oct 2023—recaptures excess incentive pay on material restatements .
- Related-party transactions: none over $120,000 in 2024 involving executives; routine compensation arrangements only .
- No options repricing; options must be granted at FMV; no golden parachute tax gross-ups .
Compensation Peer Group (Benchmarking)
Upland’s 2024 peer group used by the independent consultant (Korn Ferry) includes BIGC, CRNC, CCSI, EGIO, KLTR, LPSN, MITK, MODN, ONTF, PRCH, RMNI, SNCR, YEXT; applied to base, bonus, and long-term equity mix benchmarking .
Investment Implications
- Alignment: Hill’s equity is primarily time-vested RSUs with multi-year quarterly vesting, creating predictable vesting cadence through 2026; hedging/pledging prohibitions and ownership guidelines (4× salary within seven years) support alignment, though compliance timing depends on stock price and accumulated holdings .
- Performance sensitivity: Hill’s cash bonus is strictly formulaic to Adjusted EBITDA and margin; 2024 payout was ~16% of target on threshold-level performance, indicating plan rigor and limited guaranteed cash .
- Retention and CIC economics: Standard 12-month severance plus COBRA reimbursement; partial vesting catch-up on ordinary termination, with full double-trigger vesting upon CIC-related termination—balanced retention without excessive guarantees; estimated severance and CIC equity acceleration for Hill were $694k and $510k respectively as of 12/31/2024 .
- Execution risk: Despite EBITDA threshold achievement, multi-year TSR underperforms peers substantially (−88% vs +201% peer group from 2020–2024), raising questions about capital allocation and growth vs profitability trade-offs under finance leadership; compensation design ties cash incentives to EBITDA, not revenue growth, which may limit top-line focus .