UPS Q2 2025: No Guidance as Macro Risks Rise, $3.5B Savings Intact
- Robust cost reduction efforts: Management is on track to achieve the $3.5 billion cost savings target, driven by disciplined actions across variable, semi-variable, and fixed cost buckets—with confidence that any shortfall in initial driver attrition will eventually catch up.
- Enhanced network efficiency through automation: UPS is increasing its automation penetration, with 64% of volume processed in automated facilities (up from 60% last year), positioning the company for better cost control and more flexible scale-up/down during peak season.
- Strategic repositioning of volume mix: The successful Amazon glide-down strategy and targeted efforts to shift to higher quality, revenue-enhancing volume are setting up a more favorable mix that should drive incremental revenue per piece improvements and margin expansion over time.
- High macro uncertainty: The company highlighted unpredictable macroeconomic factors, such as potential tariff changes and uncertain consumer demand, which prevent clear forward guidance and could negatively impact revenue and margins.
- Delayed cost savings from Amazon glide down: The attrition rates in the glide down were lower than expected, potentially delaying the achievement of the targeted $3.5 billion cost reduction.
- Increased Groundsaver delivery expenses: The planned cost model for Groundsaver did not hold, leading to approximately $85 million of unexpected additional expenses, which could pressure operating margins.
| Metric | YoY Change | Reason |
|---|---|---|
Total Revenue | -2.7% | Total revenue declined by 2.7% YoY, driven largely by a dramatic 20% drop in Supply Chain Solutions revenue, while U.S. Domestic Package remained flat and International Package gained modestly. This mirrors earlier trends where segment-specific pressures—such as lower fuel surcharges and strategic divestitures—continued to weigh on overall revenue. |
U.S. Domestic Package Revenue | -0.3% | U.S. Domestic Package revenue was essentially flat (down 0.3% YoY) as beneficial shifts like a 4.5% increase in revenue per piece and air cargo improvements (observed in Q1 2025) were offset by moderated volume growth and managed cuts from key clients (e.g., Amazon). This balance reflects an evolution from prior Q1 gains into a more stable Q2 performance. |
International Package Revenue | +2.6% | International Package revenue increased by 2.6% YoY, underpinned by sustained growth in average daily package volume across both domestic and export shipments. However, unfavorable currency effects and a shift toward economy services somewhat dampened revenue per piece, a pattern consistent with the drivers observed in previous periods. |
Supply Chain Solutions Revenue | -20.0% | Supply Chain Solutions revenue sharply dropped by 20% YoY, primarily driven by the ongoing impact of the Coyote divestiture—which had already cut revenue by $563 million in Q1 2025—and further declines in forwarding operations. Although logistics and digital segments provided some offset, the structural changes continued to dominate, aligning with previous period trends. |
| Metric | Period | Previous Guidance | Current Guidance | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Revenue | Q2 2025 | no prior guidance | $21 billion | no prior guidance |
Operating Margin | Q2 2025 | no prior guidance | 9.3% | no prior guidance |
Below‐the‐line Expense | Q2 2025 | no prior guidance | $160 million | no prior guidance |
Tax Rate | Q2 2025 | no prior guidance | between 23% and 23.5% | no prior guidance |
U.S. Domestic – ADV | Q2 2025 | no prior guidance | down approximately 9% | no prior guidance |
U.S. Domestic – Revenue | Q2 2025 | no prior guidance | down low single digits | no prior guidance |
U.S. Domestic – Operating Margin | Q2 2025 | no prior guidance | expand by approximately 30 basis points | no prior guidance |
International – Revenue | Q2 2025 | no prior guidance | down approximately 2% | no prior guidance |
International – Operating Margin | Q2 2025 | no prior guidance | in the mid-teens | no prior guidance |
Supply Chain Solutions – Revenue | Q2 2025 | no prior guidance | decline approximately $500 million | no prior guidance |
Supply Chain Solutions – Operating Margin | Q2 2025 | no prior guidance | high single digits | no prior guidance |
Capital Expenditures | full year 2025 | no prior guidance | $3.5 billion | no prior guidance |
Dividends | full year 2025 | no prior guidance | $5.5 billion | no prior guidance |
Share Repurchases | full year 2025 | no prior guidance | $1 billion | no prior guidance |
Tax Rate | full year 2025 | no prior guidance | approximately 23.5% | no prior guidance |
Cost Savings | full year 2025 | no prior guidance | $3.5 billion | no prior guidance |
Amazon Volume Decline | full year 2025 | no prior guidance | approximately 30% year-over-year in Q3 and Q4 2025 | no prior guidance |
| Metric | Period | Guidance | Actual | Performance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Revenue | Q2 2025 | 21.0 billion | 21,221 million | Beat |
| Topic | Previous Mentions | Current Period | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|
Cost Reduction Initiatives and Efficiency Gains | Earlier periods detailed a $3.5B savings target with a mix of variable, semi‐variable, and fixed cost reductions, including facility closures and automation initiatives in Q1 2025, Q4 2024, and Q3 2024 | Q2 2025 emphasized the largest network reconfiguration ever—with aggressive efficiency reimagined initiatives and targeted Amazon volume glide‐down contributing to the cost reduction effort | The focus remains consistent, though the current period shows a more aggressive execution and reconfiguration drive |
Network Reconfiguration and Automation Enhancements | Discussed as part of the “Network of the Future” with multiple facility closures and initial automation efforts in Q1 2025, Q4 2024, and Q3 2024 | Q2 2025 highlighted the historic scale of the reconfiguration and noted an increased automation rate with 64% of volume processed automatically | Consistent focus with an added emphasis on scaling automation and achieving higher efficiency |
Strategic Volume Mix Shift and Glide‐Down of Low‐Margin Customers | Addressed in earlier periods through planned reductions in Amazon volume and strategic shifts to improve revenue quality in Q1 2025, Q4 2024, and Q3 2024 | Q2 2025 provided detailed progress on accelerating the Amazon glide‐down—with a 13% decline so far and plans for approximately 30% YOY in later quarters—supporting efforts to improve revenue mix | The strategy remains central while the pace has accelerated, underscoring a heightened focus on margin improvement |
Macro‐Economic, Tariff, and Trade Policy Uncertainty | Noted in Q1 2025 with detailed tariff impacts and consumer sentiment adjustments, mentioned in Q4 2024, and less so in Q3 2024 | Q2 2025 offered an in‐depth discussion of global trade shifts, specific tariff impacts (such as a 34.8% drop on a key trade lane), and customer challenges arising from these factors | There is an increasing focus on external risk factors, with more detailed explanations in the current period indicating heightened uncertainty |
Operational Execution Risks and Delays in Cost Savings Implementation | Earlier discussions in Q1 2025 highlighted phased savings and chaos costs; Q3 2024 and Q4 2024 touched on the complexity of execution | Q2 2025 explicitly addressed lower-than-expected attrition, delayed cost savings, and issues like Groundsaber delivery expenses that are impacting the anticipated pace | Concerns have become more pronounced, with explicit mention of execution risks and delays affecting cost-saving timelines |
Peak Season Demand Forecasts and U.S. Domestic Volume Challenges | Previous calls (Q1 2025, Q3 2024, Q4 2024) provided detailed forecasts and volume breakdowns with early peak planning and operational excellence | Q2 2025 highlighted significant uncertainty in peak plan timing, volume declines driven by the Amazon glide‐down, and higher Groundsaver costs contributing to domestic challenges | While the topic remains a constant concern, the current period shows increased forecast unpredictability and pressure on domestic volumes |
Negotiations with USPS and Delivery Service Agreement Uncertainties | Earlier discussions in Q1 2025 (Mail Innovations), Q3 2024 (ongoing DSA negotiations), and Q4 2024 (insourcing SurePost) | Q2 2025 reengaged with USPS specifically regarding the cost pressures on the Groundsaver product, reflecting evolving negotiation challenges | Persistent and evolving, with current period nuances driven by cost pressures prompting renewed USPS discussions |
Unexpected Operational Cost Pressures (e.g., Groundsaver Delivery Expenses) | Mentioned only indirectly in Q1 2025 and not specifically highlighted in Q3 or Q4 2024 | Q2 2025 divulged a pronounced $85 million higher-than-expected cost due to algorithm issues in Groundsaver delivery, marking a clear new concern | Emerged as a significant new area of concern, drawing sharper focus as an operational cost risk in the current period |
Shift to High‐Margin Segments (Healthcare, SMB, B2B) and Revenue Quality Improvement | Previously discussed across Q1 2025, Q4 2024, and Q3 2024 through strategies like targeted acquisitions and adjustments in revenue mix to boost quality | Q2 2025 reinforced focus on high-margin segments with clear metrics showing enhanced healthcare, SMB, and B2B performance and revenue per piece improvements | A stable strategic pillar that continues to play a major role in driving improved revenue quality and profitability |
Evolving Revenue per Piece Trends and Pricing Strategy Effectiveness | Earlier periods, particularly Q1 2025, Q3 2024, and Q4 2024, highlighted steady improvements in RPP with disciplined pricing strategies and technological tools | In Q2 2025, UPS reported a 5.5% increase in revenue per piece supported by dynamic pricing actions and volume management, though it is partly offset by higher delivery costs | Consistent improvement in pricing outcomes with effective strategies, while emerging operational cost pressures are being closely monitored |
-
Guidance & Margins
Q: Guidance absent; margin prospects?
A: Management explained that due to high uncertainty from tariffs, demand, and inventory conditions, they chose not to provide guidance now. They are making solid progress on the $3.5B cost-cutting plan, though reaching consistent double-digit domestic margins remains uncertain until further clarity emerges by the end of Q3. -
Amazon Glide Down
Q: What’s not working with Amazon glide?
A: They noted that the main challenge is a lower-than-expected full-time driver attrition rate, delaying the planned cost benefits from reducing Amazon volume. Management expects this to catch up over time. -
Groundsaver Costs
Q: Are Groundsaver costs affecting margin goals?
A: Management acknowledged that the planned delivery density algorithm didn’t perform as expected, resulting in about $85M of extra costs. They are actively working with USPS to address these issues and improve margin outcomes. -
Driver Buyouts
Q: Are buyouts included in the savings plan?
A: They confirmed that the voluntary separation program for full-time drivers is a key lever to achieve the $3.5B cost reduction, and coupled with efficiency initiatives, similar savings are anticipated into next year. -
Intl Margins
Q: How are international margins trending?
A: Management reported pressures due to trade lane shifts—particularly the China‑to‑US decline—but expects adjustments and capacity fixes to stabilize margins into the mid-to-high teens over the long run. -
China Trade Lane
Q: How will trade shifts impact China-US lanes?
A: They noted a 34.8% drop in average daily volume on the China‑to‑US lane in May–June, offset by over 20% growth in China to the rest of world lanes. Their agile network makes reallocations without needing major new infrastructure investments in Southeast Asia. -
Facility Closures
Q: What’s the plan for closures and automation?
A: Management is reviewing additional facility closures as part of network reconfiguration. They highlighted that 64% of volume now flows through automated facilities, which is key to enhancing long-term cost structure and margins. -
SMB Performance
Q: Why are SMB results challenged?
A: They explained that flat SMB performance is driven by trade uncertainty, tighter credit conditions, and policy challenges. Despite this, UPS continues to support SMB customers through its strong supply chain mapping capabilities. -
Peak Season
Q: Could peak season provide a tailwind?
A: While final peak plans are pending, management expressed cautious optimism that if consumer demand remains resilient, the peak season could offer a boost, though uncertainties linger until more clarity is seen later in Q3.
Research analysts covering UNITED PARCEL SERVICE.