Viper Energy Partners - Earnings Call - Q4 2020

Transcript

Speaker 0

Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for standing by, and welcome to the Viper Energy Partners Fourth Quarter twenty twenty Earnings Call. At this time, all participants are in a listen only mode. After the speakers' presentation, there will be a question and answer session. Please be advised that today's call is being recorded. I would now like to hand the call over to Adam Lawless, Vice President, Investor Relations.

Please go ahead.

Speaker 1

Thank you, Michelle. Good morning, and welcome to Viper Energy Partners' fourth quarter twenty twenty conference call. During our call today, we

Speaker 2

will reference an updated investor presentation, which can be found on Viper's website. Representing Viper today are Travis Stice, CEO and Kay Stantoff, President. During this conference call, the participants may make certain forward looking statements relating to company's financial condition, results of operations, plans, objectives, future performance and businesses. We caution you that actual results could differ materially from those that are indicated in these forward looking statements due to a variety of factors. Information concerning these factors can be found in the company's filings with the SEC.

In addition,

Speaker 1

we will make reference to certain non GAAP measures.

Speaker 2

The reconciliations between appropriate GAAP measures can be found in our earnings release issued yesterday afternoon. And I'll turn the call over to Travis Platt.

Speaker 3

Thank you, Adam. Welcome, everyone, and thank you for listening to Viper Energy Partners' fourth quarter twenty twenty conference call. Viper's financial and operational performance rebounded strongly in the second half of last year after surviving the unprecedented volatility experienced through most of 2020. Commodity prices have increased, and associated activity on Viper's acreage has increased alongside the commodity. Even in a year where we experienced historically low commodity prices, Viper was able to generate almost $200,000,000 in operating cash flow, which was almost entirely converted to free cash flow due to our business having zero capital requirements.

This recovery again highlights both the advantaged nature of the royalty business model as well as the benefit of Viper's symbiotic relationship with our parent company Diamondback. Looking at the fourth quarter specifically, Viper's 10% quarter over quarter increase in oil production was driven primarily by Viper having an interest in 21 of Diamondback's 35 completions, with well performance exceeding internal expectations. Viper also benefited from third party operated well performance and timing of wells being turned to production outperforming our prior conservative expectations, which had been lowered due to the uncertainty presented by the volatile oil prices experienced early last year. Viper was once again able to generate significant free cash flow both organically as well as inorganically through noncore asset sales, which accelerated in the fourth quarter. The truly unique nature of Viper's business model is highlighted by the fact that during the fourth quarter alone, we were able to declare a $0.14 distribution, repurchase over 2,000,000 units and repay over $40,000,000 in debt.

Over the past nine months, we have now reduced total debt by $110,000,000 or roughly 16% over this period. Further, the units we have repurchased to date represent 1.6% of total units previously outstanding. Looking ahead to 2021, we have initiated production guidance for 2021 that incorporates our strong backlog of work in progress plus line of sight wells as well as the anticipated impact to our production from the recent winter storms in the Permian Basin. Biker is expected to have meaningful exposure to Diamondback's high graded, primarily Midland Basin focused development in 2021. Additionally, visibility into third party operators' anticipated activity levels continues to increase as commodity prices have improved and operators have returned to work.

However, in an effort to be conservative, we will continue to incorporate slower than normal timing assumptions in the guidance we have provided. Despite this conservatism, along with the production impact from the recent winter storms, Viper is still expected to generate roughly $250,000,000 of free cash flow this year assuming $55 WTI and production at the midpoint of our full year 2020 guide. This equates to greater than 8% free cash flow yield as a percentage of our enterprise value or roughly 10% based on our current market cap. Viper remains in strong financial shape with $515,000,000 of liquidity and will look to continue to decrease leverage while also increasing return of capital to our unitholders over the coming quarters. In conclusion, 2020 was truly historic for all the long reasons.

Despite these difficult conditions, Viper showcased its differentiated business model and best in class cost structure to emerge from this down cycle with a positive forward outlook. Operator, please open the line for questions.

Speaker 0

Our first question comes from Neal Dingmann with Truist Securities. Your line is open.

Speaker 1

Good morning, guys. I'm trying to figure out here with your guidance, maybe give me a little bit of help here. You mentioned about all the wells that are in process in 05/29 you put in there and then you talked about the five thirty eight wells that are in site. I'm just wondering, could you talk about kind of what's based in the guide? Is that just these wells or maybe the expectations for total wells around that?

Neil. Good question. I think we're assuming somewhere in the range of nine to 10 net Diamondback wells throughout the year. I think while we had a lot of high interest Diamondback wells come on in Q3 and Q4, We're taking a bit of a pause there based on the schedule today. So that number will come down a little bit here in Q1, but pick back up in Q2 of twenty twenty one.

And then we're assuming, you know, kind of somewhere around one net well a quarter on the non op. I think that probably is a little more back half weighted than the Diamondback plan. But I think we're pretty excited on the amount of net wealth we're seeing the non op side start to get permanent, drilled and eventually completed here as the commodities recover. Okay. No, that makes sense.

I knew it me back quite. And then just one follow-up. Should we think about kind of that 58% oil weighting? I think the NRI was around 6%. Is that going to be somewhere in that ballpark sort of going forward?

I think the oil weighting at 60% is a fair assessment, Austin, on the FANG operated 6% NRI. Yes, that's probably about right, 6% to 7%. We kind of talked about it as percent exposure to the stand alone Diamondback development plan, so probably 70% exposure or so to that plan. And then that will go down as QEP and Guide on are incorporated. But yes, I think 6% to 7% average NRI throughout the year will be fair.

Our

Speaker 0

next question comes from Derrick Whitfield with Stifel.

Speaker 1

Wanted to circle back to your comments on visibility at a high level, referencing your forward visibility slides on Pages seven and nine. Could you comment on how we should think about Diamondback's contribution to Viper post the QEP and Gannon transactions? Would it be safe to assume the combined value of work in progress in line of sight wells would remain around that 10 to 11 net well or in line with Q3 and Q4 levels? Yes. I think that's right, Derek.

I mean, I think we'll get into this probably later in the call, we do have a lot of opportunity to increase mineral ownership under QEP and Guidon. We didn't own a lot of minerals under those two entities prior to announcing these two deals, but our team is doing some work and trying to get more exposure under the couple pads that we have visibility to that might not have permits filed already to get a hop on a good deal there. So I don't think it changes the addition of QEP or guidance changes the amount of net wells under Diamondback for the year. But certainly, as the year progresses, think there will be opportunity to increase that number with selective purchasing of minerals underneath the pro form a Diamondback development plan. Okay.

That was, in fact, my follow-up, with the pending successful closure of those two transactions. You perhaps put some parameters or speak to the degree of A and D opportunity that presents to Viper? Yes. It's pretty significant, Derek, and people have been calling us. I think we've been still trying to work the pro form a development plan to make sure we're buying selectively.

We also need to make sure we're managing our balance sheet appropriately. And I think the capital allocation decision for us is going to be do we continue buying back shares or do we use some cash to buy minerals or trade minerals or continue to sell non op minerals like we did in the fourth quarter. Think that market continues to heal. Think you think about Viper, we no longer need to be the biggest mineral company out there. We just need to be the best.

To be the best means we have to have more visibility into, the other side of our business card, which we're trying to do here by by buying more minerals under Diamondback. Makes sense. Very helpful, guys.

Speaker 4

Thank you, Derek.

Speaker 0

Our next question comes from Gail Nicholson with Stephens. Your line is open.

Speaker 4

Good morning. When looking at that $250,000,000 of free cash flow generated at $55 oil, How do you bucket that in the standpoint of a cash distribution payment to shareholders versus debt reduction versus continuing the buyback and or future M and A events?

Speaker 1

Gail. I think we're pretty happy with the 50% of distributable cash flow going to investors in the form of the distribution right now. The Board did have a very active discussion on the buyback, and we're very happy that the buyback has worked to date. I think the buyback versus buying more minerals under Diamondback is really the fulcrum here because, you know, I think probably a quarter of our free cash flow still goes towards debt reduction. You know, I think we want our revolver to be at or as close to zero as possible by the end of this year.

We're well on our way to doing that. If we have visibility into a revolver at zero, our bonds are trading well, so I'm not concerned there And more free cash flow than the distribution percentage will probably likely increase over time.

Speaker 4

Great. And then looking at the over $40,000,000 in asset sales that were done this quarter, Were those, like, smaller packages? Was there a larger package? Can you just talk about kind of what that the M and A space looks like on the divestiture side for you guys?

Speaker 1

Yeah. You know, it's really four deals, two small, two of decent size. You know, the the two of decent size were in the one was in the 12 to $15,000,000 range, and one was close to $20,000,000. And those were all under third parties, you know, not operated by Diamondback without, you know, true visibility, you know, not not not a lot of permits, no existing production,

Speaker 2

you know, some vertical production, but no meaningful production.

Speaker 1

You know, we we were happy to, get that deal done, and I think it accelerated the deleveraging process and also allowed us to buy back a lot of stock in December and and January as the stock, you know, was weaker than it is today. And, also, we we ended the year at at under three times leverage. So I think that was a testament to the the team, you know, getting these deals done before the end of the year and not touching that three times number that we, you know, don't want to go above.

Speaker 4

Great. Thank you.

Speaker 1

Thank you.

Speaker 0

Our next question comes from Pearce Hammond with Simmons Energy.

Speaker 5

My first question, well, first,

Speaker 1

just a statement.

Speaker 5

Congrats on the success in fortifying the balance sheet. Just curious what leverage ratio are you targeting for the balance sheet? And when you reach that target, would you expect to increase the payout ratio? Or is the payout ratio a function of how much stock you expect to buy back?

Speaker 1

Yes. Good question, Pierce. I think it's more a gross debt reduction. Like to like I was saying earlier, I'd like the revolver down to zero. I think with the forward strip where it is, the forward free cash flow outlook looks strong enough that we'll be comfortably under 2x by the end of the year.

I think longer term, we prefer to be in the 1x to 1.5x ratio, but also paying down debt. So first step is under two. I think it's going to happen pretty quickly here with the strip where it is. But just like at Diamondback, I don't think that precludes us from continuing to increase the returns to shareholders in the form of the distribution.

Speaker 5

Thank you, Casey. And then as a follow-up to that, as the balance sheet is strengthened and as it continues to get better, would that mean that the desire to hedge would be going down as well?

Speaker 1

I think we've learned that maybe some a small amount of hedging at IPER to protect the downside or protect a minimum distribution and a maximum leverage it's probably going to be in the cards. I don't think it's going to be us hedging all of our production, but certainly protecting that downside and guaranteeing some returns to investors and simplifying this business is probably prudent over a longer period of time here.

Speaker 5

Okay. Thank you, Casey. As a comment, I love the prepared remarks where Travis said 2020 truly historic for all the wrong reasons. Well put.

Speaker 3

Yes. Thank you.

Speaker 1

We're on to 2021.

Speaker 0

There are no further questions. I'd to turn the call back over to Travis Stice, CEO, for any closing remarks.

Speaker 1

So before Travis speaks, there wasn't a question about the storm impact in Q1. I just want to give investors some guidelines around the year because, obviously, guidance has taken down a little bit of Viper. We're assuming four to five days of downtime on Diamondback operated properties, and we're assuming five to seven days of downtime on non op properties, just to be conservative and then getting their production back. I'd point people to kind of look at Q1 as very similar to what we produced in Q2 of twenty twenty, but then some pretty significant growth after that in Q2 through Q4, which kind of equals a similar oil production guide to where the Street was prior to the storm impact. While the storm impact is going to be meaningful in Q1, we do expect a pretty quick rebound in Q2, and we saw some positive things early in Q1 prior to the storm.

So, Travis, I'll let you close.

Speaker 3

I appreciate those comments, Case. Thank you again to everyone participating in today's call. If you've got any questions, please contact us using the contact information provided.

Speaker 0

Ladies and gentlemen, this does conclude the program. You may all disconnect. Everyone, have a great day.