VE
Viper Energy, Inc. (VNOM)·Q3 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q3 2025 delivered strong operational growth and cash returns despite a GAAP loss from a non-cash impairment; adjusted EPS was $0.40 with consolidated Adjusted EBITDA of $393M, and total capital returned equaled $0.83 per Class A share (85% of pro forma cash available for distribution) .
- Viper declared a base dividend of $0.33 and variable dividend of $0.25; repurchased 2.4M shares for ~$90M, and guided Q4 net oil production to 65–67 Mbo/d (up ~20% per-share YoY) .
- Announced definitive agreement to sell non‑Permian assets for $670M (expected close Q1 2026), supporting deleveraging toward the $1.5B net debt target and enabling nearly 100% cash return to shareholders post-close .
- Management emphasized leaning into buybacks given “market dislocation” and maintaining a robust base-plus-variable dividend, with visibility to mid-single-digit organic oil growth in 2026 from Diamondback-operated development .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
What Went Well
- Record activity on royalty acreage: 739 gross (15.2 net) wells turned to production in Q3; average daily oil volumes rose to 56,087 bo/d (108,859 boe/d) .
- Capital returns and discipline: 85% of pro forma cash available for distribution returned, $0.58 base+variable dividend, and $90M buybacks; CFO-level guidance indicated line of sight to returning nearly 100% post-divestiture .
- Clear growth outlook: Q4 oil guidance implies ~20% per-share YoY increase; management reiterated mid-single-digit organic oil growth in 2026 on Diamondback’s drillbit exposure (5–7% NRI on average) .
Quotation examples:
- “Our Q4 2025 oil production guidance implies a ~20% increase in oil production per share compared to Q4 2024.” — CEO Kaes Van’t Hof .
- “We felt it appropriate to lean into our return of capital commitment and return 85% of pro forma cash available for distribution in the third quarter to stockholders.” — CEO .
- “We will have line of sight to return nearly 100% of cash available for distribution to stockholders.” — CEO .
What Went Wrong
- GAAP net loss from impairment: Consolidated net loss of $197M, with a $360M non-cash impairment tied to properties recorded at Diamondback’s historical carrying value from the May 1 drop-down .
- Price/mix headwinds: Combined realized price fell to $39.24/boe, down from $45.83/boe YoY; natural gas price remained weak ($1.02/Mcf) while depletion per boe increased .
- Higher interest expense run-rate and transaction costs: Net interest expense per boe rose to $3.20 and transaction expenses were $15M; GAAP diluted EPS was -$0.52 due to non-cash items .
Financial Results
Quarterly Financials (GAAP and Adjusted)
Note: Values marked with * retrieved from S&P Global.
Operating Income Components (YoY and QoQ context)
KPIs and Unit Economics
Q3 2025 Actuals vs Wall Street Consensus (S&P Global)
Note: Values marked with * retrieved from S&P Global.
Guidance Changes
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- Capital allocation: “We felt it appropriate to… return 85% of pro forma cash available for distribution… As we move to close this divestiture… we will have line of sight to return nearly 100% of cash available for distribution.” — CEO .
- Non‑Permian divestiture use of proceeds: “Net proceeds would be about $610 million… pay down the revolver to zero… and almost pay our term loan down…” — CEO .
- Growth visibility: “Our Q4 2025 oil production guidance implies a ~20% increase in oil production per share compared to Q4 2024… anticipate mid‑single digit organic oil production growth in 2026.” — CEO .
- AI/automation synergy: “Tracking 35,000 wells every month should not be a manual process… biggest thing from the CTO team has been big data and automation.” — CEO .
Q&A Highlights
- Deleveraging and higher cash returns: Proceeds from the $670M asset sale expected to reduce revolver/term loan balances, positioning for sustained near-100% return of cash available for distribution when net debt target is met .
- Buybacks vs dividends: Management will remain a distribution vehicle but is “compelled to buy back shares” given valuation and market dislocation, with flexibility to lean further without compromising the balance sheet .
- Third‑party activity/backlog: Backlog growth is mixed between CTO contribution and legacy Viper assets; broad exposure to Permian operators supports confidence in 2026 .
- 2026 production framework: Mid-single-digit growth off Q4 pro forma base; asset sale volumes (~5 Mbo/d oil) to be stripped out with remaining assets growing by “a couple thousand barrels per day” .
- Hedge philosophy: Continue downside protection via deferred premium puts while retaining upside; hedge levels flex with leverage needs .
Estimates Context
- Q3 2025 EPS beat and EBITDA beat: Primary EPS $0.40 vs $0.3907 consensus (beat), consolidated Adjusted EBITDA $393M vs ~$361.5M consensus (beat). Revenue was essentially in-line/slightly below at $399.0M vs $400.3M consensus. Values retrieved from S&P Global.
- Implications: Street likely to adjust models for higher Q4 production (guidance 65–67 Mbo/d) and stronger EBITDA run-rate post-Sitio/notes refinancing, while incorporating higher interest expense per boe and removal of non‑Permian volumes post close .
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Production momentum: Q3 oil volumes up sharply; Q4 guidance implies ~20% per-share YoY growth; mid-single-digit organic oil growth expected in 2026 (ex non‑Permian) .
- Robust cash returns: 85% payout in Q3; base+variable dividends of $0.58 and $90M buybacks; visibility to near-100% returns as net debt approaches $1.5B target .
- Portfolio optimization: $670M non‑Permian sale re‑cores business to Permian royalties; proceeds to deleverage and increase capital return flexibility .
- Diamondback alignment: 5–7% average interest in Diamondback wells and broad third‑party exposure underpin durable growth and cash flow .
- Non‑cash impairment obscures GAAP optics: $360M impairment drove GAAP loss; adjusted metrics (EPS $0.40, Adj. EBITDA $393M) better reflect operating performance .
- Cost/price dynamics: Combined realized price per boe softened; depletion and interest per boe increased, but cash margins remain strong due to low operating costs .
- Tactical buybacks: Management prioritizes buybacks amid perceived dislocation while preserving base-plus-variable dividend, offering multiple levers for capital return .
Note: S&P Global consensus and actuals marked with * are sourced via S&P Global. All other figures and quotes are from company filings and the Q3 2025 earnings call.